Group sues to shut down power corridor

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer
Lawsuit could affect SDG&E's Sunrise Powerlink proposal | Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:38 PM PST

An environmental group sued Thursday to overturn the federal government's designation of Southern California and Arizona as an electricity corridor of "national interest," something with big implications for a power line proposed for San Diego County.

In October, the Department of Energy put seven Southern California counties ---- including San Diego, Riverside and Imperial ---- in the corridor, which spans nearly 70,000 square miles. The agency also designated a national corridor along the heavily populated East Coast.

Under energy legislation passed in 2005, proponents of power-line projects in national corridors have the option of asking the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to overrule state denials. And officials with San Diego Gas & Electric Co., which wants to string a 150-mile, high-voltage line between El Centro and Carmel Valley, have said they would consider invoking that option.

For now, utility officials are working with the California Public Utilities Commission, a regulatory body that is reviewing its $1.3 billion proposal and is expected to deliver a decision by August.

But the Arizona-based Center for Biological Diversity, which filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles federal court Thursday, asked that the Department of Energy be ordered to withdraw the California-Arizona corridor and prepare an environmental study before trying again.

Amy Atwood, a staff attorney for the group in Portland, Ore., said the National Environmental Policy Act requires agencies to study environmental impacts before making such sweeping decisions.

"That's the law that forces all federal agencies to look before they leap," Atwood said.

The Department of Energy contends such a study is not required for the corridor overall, but for individual projects proposed inside it.

In a statement, department spokeswoman Julie Ruggiero said: "Designation of corridors, as directed by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, in and of itself has no environmental impact, but instead identifies a problem and shines a spotlight on areas of the country that are experiencing or could experience interruptions in power supply."

Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Advertisement

2 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Who's kidding who ? wrote on Jan 11, 2008 6:54 AM:If "designation of the corridors...in and of itself has no environmental impact" then why would SDG&e think about invoking the Energy Rule to get around the refusal of the project by the PUC and BLM ? Why would they if the law has "no environmental ipact" - that is just too obvius ! Of course it does. It would set aside our California CEQA requirements and therefore the PUC and BLM rulings ! SDG&E should look at alternative sources of energy instead of running the Sunrise Powerlink, which will have a negative effect on all of us.

Rape back-country for shareholders wrote on Jan 11, 2008 7:42 AM:It is sad when citizens jump on the Sempra bandwagon just because Sempra declares that the Sunrise Powerlink is necessary and there is no alternative. Think about it people, has an electric utility ever really taken consumers best interests to heart, HELL NO, it is all about making money for shareholders.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos