Obama, Clinton eager to scoop up Edwards' supporters if he drops out of Democratic race
By: NANCY BENAC - Associated Press | ∞
WASHINGTON ---- Democrat John Edwards placed second in Iowa, third in New Hampshire and faces even longer odds of pulling off a win in upcoming states.
But he still attracts the support of as many as 20 percent of Democratic voters in national polls. And where those Edwardians turn next if their first choice for president exits the race could well be the determining factor in who claims the Democratic nomination.
"Every time somebody drops out of a race when it's close, where they go is important," says Jenny Backus, a Democratic consultant who is not working for any candidate. And Edwards' supporters, she says, "are even more priceless than your average jewel."
That's because this year's race is so competitive, and Edwards' supporters are viewed as loyal and dependable voters who will actually turn out on Election Day.
Barack Obama, with his outsider's message of change, looks like a logical second choice for those attracted to Edwards' pledge to fight special interests and corporate greed.
Indeed, Edwards voters in Iowa favored Obama over Clinton as their second choice by a nearly two-to-one margin in caucus-night surveys. And Edwards supporters in New Hampshire reported they had a far more favorable impression of Obama than of Clinton, according election-night surveys there.
Donald Wood, a 52-year-old one-time Edwards supporter from Merrill, Wis., fits that profile. Now that Edwards' presidential prospects look dim, he's leaning toward Obama.
"I think it's time for this country to have a change," Wood said in explaining his new interest in Obama. "With the troubles and everything that the Clintons had before, I don't think the country needs those problems any more."
Consultant Backus says that while Edwards voters are sure to find some of the same qualities that they like when they take a look at Obama, "there is definitely an opening for Hillary Clinton to exploit" as she pivots toward economic issues that hold appeal for populist-oriented Edwards supporters.
Democratic pollster Peter Hart said Obama has the easier sell to Edwards voters because of "a greater overlap of convergence" in the two candidates' messages, but he nonetheless views Edwards' voters as up for grabs if he drops out.
"People are supporting John Edwards for a lot of different reasons," Hart said. "It's not just based on an issue or a set of ideas. So I think it's a jump ball."
Unlike some past elections, where Democratic constituencies were sharply divided over candidates ---- Jimmy Carter vs. Teddy Kennedy for example ---- this time all the leading candidates are favorably viewed by a wide swath of the parties' voters, Hart said. That makes it easier for people to shift from one candidate to another.
On the Democratic side, he said, "there just isn't the rigid ideology that often shapes a race."
Imogene Ragan, a 61-year-old from Huntington Beach, Calif., showed it's more than message that will determine where voters' loyalties lie. She said she's backing Edwards because of "his presence" and because he seems to be honest. She said she might shift to Clinton if Edwards leaves the race, in part because Obama "seems more like a politician than a person."
A mid-December survey of voters nationally conducted for the AP and Yahoo News found that Edwards supporters split about evenly between Clinton and Obama when asked which candidate would be their second choice. Clinton and Obama each were the second choices of about 27 percent of Edwards supporters. Another 28 percent were unsure who would be their second choice, and the rest were thinly scattered among other candidates.
Edwards draws much of his support from people over 50 and those without a college education, the survey found. His voters are more likely to be men than women, and a third are evangelical Christians ---- a much larger share than among Clinton or Obama voters.
Steve Jarding, a lecturer at Harvard who ran Edwards' political action committee for a year, said Edwards voters won't automatically switch to Obama even if Obama's message is perceived to be more in synch with that of Edwards. The deciding factor instead may be which candidate is seen as more likely to prevail in November, he said.
"When you support a candidate and they don't win, there's just as much chance that then you say, 'I'll go with somebody who can win. I went with my heart, now I want to go with my head,"' Jarding said.
Two decades ago, Jarding said, voters rarely cast their ballots based on a strategic choice about who was most electable. Now, he says, particularly after chafing through eight years of the Bush administration and feeling burned by the loss of John Kerry in 2004, Democrats are saying, "We've got to win."
The allure of the Edwards voters will not be lost on Clinton or Obama. No doubt either would love to have Edwards' endorsement if the time comes, although it's not clear how much weight that carries with voters.
For now, the two must tread carefully to court the Edwardians without offending them while their candidate still is in the race.
"You don't want to start negotiations before the patient's taken off life support," said Jarding.
More Stories
Advertisement
Susan wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:26 PM:Wishful thinking by the author. Edwards is NOT dropping out.
The author's disdain for Edwards is showing.
Dalla wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:41 PM:The mainstream media would love for John to rollover and die, but he's not going to. He is in it to win it and he's far from done. He is a strong campaigner, and even though the ONLY PRESS HE'S GETTING BY THE MEDIA NOW IS ARTICLES ABOUT WHO GETS HIS SUPPORTERS, his supporters aren't going anywhere.
JOHN EDWARDS to the Democratic Convention!
Vista Resident wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:12 PM:Edwards says he's in it until the primaries. So, I doubt if he will let media speculation goad him into dropping out.
If the deciding factor for who to vote for will be which candidate is seen as more likely to prevail, then how can Clinton be that person if a majority are expected to vote against her in the general election. Republicans are pretty energized to vote against her. The polls have indicated that Edwards is slightly more electable than Obama since he does better against McCain and every other Republican except Giuliani.
If Edwards doesn't win the primary, then many of his supporters wouldn't even vote for Hillary in the general election. Edwards is running on fair trade and "power to the people". Bill Clinton gave us NAFTA.
I was dismayed that Obama made no fuss after the New Hampshire primary about the fact that the vote didn't match the polling. In fact, it was way, way off only for Obama/Clinton. Obama won the hand-count but lost the count on small town Diebold opscan voting machines. I don't hear Obama demanding a recount. This reminds me too much of Kerry at the last presidential election. Exit polls showed Kerry/Edwards winning in a huge sweep. The vote started to swing for Bush later in the polling day. Meanwhile, Rove was reported to have been busily on the phone during this time. Doing what? Kerry postponed conceding for only one day at the urging of Edwards. Edwards was ready to fight it. These folks are wasting their time running if they aren't willing to insist on a fair count of the vote. Plus, if Obama will wimp out already, then what will he wimp out on later?
George wrote on Jan 17, 2008 10:22 AM:John Edwards has many wonderful qualities, the right vision and yet I am optimistic that he will drop and open the door for Obama to positively change Amkerica. I cannot stomach the thought of 8 years of the soap opera that the Clintons will bring if Hillary is elected. If Hillary is the dem. candidate, I'm on to the Republican nominee which I hope will be John McCain.
Teresa wrote on Jan 23, 2008 3:18 PM:I agree with the above poster. It is obvious that the author of the above is not a Edward's supporter.
After seeing the debate the other night and the jabs made by both Clinton and Obama - I know that this is not what I want to hear from the next President of the United States. I also do not want to see a Republican take office. I truly feel, if Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama run against McCain - we will have a Republican President. I've spoken to many liberal Conservatives in my area, who actually don't have a big problem with John Edwards and after having eight years of President Bush, say they might think about voting for John Edwards, but would never vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.
John Edwards has the passion and the drive to make America a country to be proud of again. As for, Hillary Clinton - why do we want the same two families running this country for 20+ years, Bush- Clinton - Bush - then Clinton again. No way, I want change, which means getting rid of the Bush/Clinton dynasty. Then Barack Obama - I like him, but I don't feel the passion, and I don't like the rhetoric. When I listen to him, I hear - Hopes, Dreams, Change.....that's all great, now tell me what you want to do to make change. At least Hillary Clinton goes into detail and John Edwards does too. The American people need to start listening to the the debates. The one candidate who is consistent and does well every time is John Edwards. There's only been caucuses and primaries held in four states so far - hopefully people will start backing the one candidate who can win against the Republicans. That's John Edwards.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (18)
- TEMECULA: Parade, fireworks draw thousands on nation's birthday (11)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (10)
- CARLSBAD: Golf benefit raises $20,000 for Conner's Cause (9)
- SAN PASQUAL VALLEY: Animal park offering extended hours, extra shows and activities (7)
Advertisement





