Man accused of robbing day laborers faces trial

By: SCOTT MARSHALL - Staff Writer
Prosecutors may add kidnapping charges against Thomas Graham, 33 | Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:02 AM PST

VISTA -- An Escondido man accused of participating in a series of robberies of day laborers last summer throughout North San Diego County was ordered Tuesday to stand trial on multiple robbery charges and could face additional kidnapping counts that carry a potential life prison sentence.

Superior Court Judge Runston G. Maino ruled at the conclusion of a preliminary hearing Tuesday that the prosecution had presented enough evidence to create a "strong suspicion" that Thomas Graham, 33, committed the charged crimes. Responding to a request from the prosecution, Maino also said he believed the evidence presented at the hearing supported charging Graham with kidnapping for robbery.

Graham already faced between 40 and 60 years in state prison if convicted of the robberies, attorneys in the case said, but would face 15 years to life in prison for one kidnapping charge. Maino also increased Graham's bail to $1 million.

Graham's attorney, Herb Weston, argued that kidnapping requires that a defendant used force, fear or threats to move a victim, but that each of the alleged robbery victims said they got into the robbers' car voluntarily.

Deputy District Attorney Bryn Kirvin said she will review the judge's comments and the evidence from the hearing to decide whether to file the additional charges, but at least one kidnapping count is likely to be added by Graham's next court date, Feb. 26.

The charges stem from incidents that occurred in June, July and August in areas across North County in which day laborers said they were offered work and then were taken to remote locations and robbed.

Maino said in court Tuesday that the alleged victims in some incidents had testified that they had handed over wallets and money, including one man who said he gave the robbers $700. In many of the incidents, the alleged victims told of being taken from a public area to isolated locations, Maino said.

One witness, Ebner Escalante Lopez, testified last week that he and his brother-in-law accepted an offer of work from two women in Rancho Bernardo and were in their car about three minutes before a knife-wielding man in the back seat said "give me your money or your life."

Escalante identified Graham as that man.

Weston argued Tuesday that Maino should be concerned about the validity of the witness identifications of Graham in court. Every witness testified that a factor that helped them identify Graham was that he was the only person in custody in the courtroom, Weston argued.

Maino said most of the witnesses previously had identified Graham in photo lineups that appeared to have been fair and that he thought the identifications of Graham "were solid."

Two other defendants charged in connection with the robbery series already have pleaded guilty to two robbery counts each.

Prosecutors did not agree to any sentence as part of the guilty plea of Kevin William Anderson, 32, of Vista. He was sentenced Tuesday morning to two years in state prison, Kirvin said.

Nicole Dianne Crouch, 35, of Escondido pleaded guilty last week and will be sentenced Feb. 27 to five years in prison under the terms of her plea agreement.

A fourth suspect, April Marie Lewis, 25, of Escondido, has pleaded not guilty. The preliminary hearing for Graham also included Lewis, who was pregnant at the time, when it began a week ago. Attorneys in the case said they believe she had her baby while in jail, prompting a delay in her case.

Lewis' case is due back in court this morning for a status conference, Kirvin said.

-- Contact staff writer Scott Marshall at (760) 631-6623 or smarshall@nctimes.com.

Next
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Roberto1 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 3:25 PM:Don't forget those hate crime laws...there good for padding the charges.

Yeah.. wrote on Jan 22, 2008 4:12 PM:Because it [may have been] a hate crime. If you are going to rob someone.. why would you pick a day laborer? Im sure they must have been strolling around showing off their jewelry and iphones.

yeah2 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 4:34 PM:they carry Cash

mona wrote on Jan 22, 2008 6:05 PM:there was no hate crime it was strictly for the easy money. i should know i am related to one of the people being charged.

Roberto1 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 6:10 PM:Good to here Mona...I don't believe in hate crime laws and this is a good example of how they are used arbitrarily by the so-called justice system...There is no such thing as good crime and no victim is better than the other one. Hopefully your relative has learned his lesson.

heyroberto1 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 6:52 PM:What lesson should Mona's relative have learned by this? Did he do something wrong Archie Bunker ?

tubaroo wrote on Jan 22, 2008 7:35 PM:What exactly is the definition of a hate crime? Targeting people based on gender, race, class, or sexual orietation? Who knows? Do any of these apply?

whaaa?! wrote on Jan 22, 2008 7:48 PM:I heard it was some yuppy from Carlsbad or DelMar trying to pay their bills. Things are getting pretty desperate in ol SoCal.

pathetic wrote on Jan 22, 2008 7:49 PM:desperate.

Skip wrote on Jan 22, 2008 8:11 PM:I am still laughing........... someone called Roberto1, "Archie Bunker". That is hysterical! And to think I wasn't even going to look at this story.

Roberto1 wrote on Jan 22, 2008 8:44 PM:To Archie Bunker comment...Your racism is showing...

Gramps wrote on Jan 22, 2008 8:47 PM:I'm not sure about the legal definition, but to my way of thinking, a crime becomes a hate crime when it affects (targets or terrorizes) a specific group. In other words, if you are robbed, and other people of your group feel that they are targeted for similar crimes, it can be a hate crime. When a homosexual is beaten up, for example, then if it seems s/he was beaten BECAUSE s/he was homosexual, it strikes fear in the heart of other homosexuals. It's a hate crime because it is, in a way, a crime or threat against people other than the victim. IMHO

mona wrote on Jan 22, 2008 8:51 PM:again you have no idea. day laborers walk around with cash in pockets, easy money. but that does not make it right. it may have been a desperate crime but not a hate crime.

I say wrote on Jan 22, 2008 9:15 PM:community service would be enough. At least no more time than Marion Shepilov Barry, Jr.

To I say wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:01 AM:Community service would be enough?? Give me a break! If you commit the crime, do the time!

Walk around with $? wrote on Jan 23, 2008 7:21 AM:Heck when you get 10 of them living in apartment and they don't know each other, you should see the creative ways they have to hid their money! Not to bright, but creative. I am just suprised more of these apartments aren't broken into.

Ray wrote on Jan 23, 2008 8:30 AM:As you Puritans say it, "illegal is illegal" and "crime is a crime".

Yeah Right! wrote on Jan 23, 2008 1:56 PM:Think that I, Mr. White Bread Legal Citizen would get this kind of attention from law enforcement if I was robbed on the street?

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos