Consultant: As city, Wildomar could weather economic slowdown

By: AARON CLAVERIE - Staff Writer
Consultant says bad economy does not doom a city | Friday, January 25, 2008 1:00 PM PST

WILDOMAR ---- If there is a prolonged economic slump or a full-blown recession, there would be a tangible effect on early Wildomar city budgets if the community incorporates this year.

For instance, projected property tax receipts would be negatively affected by falling property values, building permit fees could dry up and the city's projected sales tax receipts would take a hit if proposed retail projects in the pipeline are delayed.

While acknowledging those possibilities, Gary Thompson, the consultant who wrote an analysis of Wildomar's projected finances, said the city council should be able to make sure costs are kept in line and keep the city running smoothly by managing within a leaner budget.

"Forming a city in bad economic times is not a disaster as people would have you believe," said the Rancho Santa Margarita councilman and head of GST Consulting, the firm that produced the comprehensive fiscal analysis that was referenced by the county when it approved putting Wildomar's incorporation on the ballot.

Area voters will decide Feb. 5 whether to incorporate. If approved by a majority of voters, Wildomar would become a city July 1.

In the first year, called the transition year, the county would continue to provide services to ensure a smooth handover. The city would have to pay the county back within five years for the cost of those services.

For some of the candidates, particularly those opposed to cityhood, the slumping economy has become a political football.

In community forums, campaign literature and stump speeches, cityhood critics are arguing that the economic climate isn't ideal for incorporation. Those critics contend they aren't against cityhood as much as they are against Wildomar becoming a city now. They are urging residents to oppose incorporation until the economy rebounds and the area's sales tax base grows larger.

Cityhood supporters, including the majority of the people running for the council, dismiss the economic concerns, saying the area is well-positioned to succeed as a city that will be able to provide the services that the county has been providing. They contend the city will be able to do that without tax increases.

Supporters point to the fiscal analysis produced by Thompson that shows numerous sources of general fund revenue, including, if Wildomar incorporates before June 20, 2009, millions annually in the form of vehicle license fees from the state. The legislation that provides license fees to newly incorporated cities expires July 1, 2009.

Fulfilling a state requirement, Wildomar's fiscal analysis compared the community to six existing cities: San Jacinto, Beaumont, Lake Elsinore, Goleta, Aliso Viejo and Rancho Santa Margarita.

Of those cities, only Lake Elsinore had a more diversified revenue stream, a measurement of the ability of a city to collect various types of revenue ---- property tax, sales tax and fees ---- from its businesses and residents.

In Thompson's city of Rancho Santa Margarita, half of the annual revenue is composed of sales tax receipts boosted by auto dealerships there. Sales tax makes up nearly half of Temecula's annual revenue. In Lake Elsinore, sales tax revenue makes up about one-fourth of total revenue.

In contrast, the fiscal analysis predicts sales tax revenue will form only about 10 percent to 20 percent of Wildomar's annual total revenue, which is expected to be $13 million in fiscal year 2009-10. The vehicle license fees Wildomar would receive will make up a little less than 25 percent of the budget in fiscal year 2009-10.

Property tax revenue, which Thompson said is generally a stable revenue stream because of the affect of Proposition 13, is projected to be about 25 percent of total revenue in fiscal year 2009-10. When calculating that number, Thompson assumed an average increase of 2.5 percent per year from the base year figures from 2005-06.

Prop. 13 caps annual property tax increases at 2 percent. Thompson added what he believes is a conservative half percentage point to account for the property tax money the state allows a city to capture once a home is resold.

This diversity should allow the city to more readily absorb a downturn in a specific revenue stream, Thompson said. Also, because the city isn't as dependent on sales tax, it shouldn't be as affected by economic downturns because sales tax is the most volatile component of a city's revenue stream, he said.

Richard Estes, president of the Wildomar Chamber of Commerce, said the city's sales tax base will be a source of potential growth for the city.

The staunch cityhood supporter said the retail base is in the process of catching up to the rapid increase in the housing stock since 2000. So, he maintains, even if housing construction grinds to a halt, he still expects businesses to flock to the area to serve the residents who have moved to the community in recent years.

Among the large plots of land in the city targeted for future retail development are 146 acres owned by retired doctor Robin Oxman, who has contributed to the campaigns of half the candidates, and land north of Cornerstone Church off Bundy Canyon. The Oxman land is west of Interstate 15, south of Clinton Keith Road. The Bundy Canyon property is tabbed for a Wal-Mart.

Yet, some remain skeptical that the city would be self-supporting given the economic climate and the area's limited shopping opportunities.

"Having land to build on is great but you have to have someone to build," said Joe McCabe, a member of the county's Wildomar Municipal Advisory Council. "You need a builder and the builder needs to know his buildings will be occupied."

McCabe, speaking as a private citizen not as a member of the council, said the majority of people in Wildomar shop in the "big box" stores in Lake Elsinore and Murrieta and those retailers likely won't set up shop here.

"We'll have little stores. And little stores don't produce a lot of money," he said.

In an economic downturn, the county would see declining revenues just as a new city would.

But, McCabe said, a recession would have a bigger affect on a small city with a small budget than it would on a large county with a larger budget.

"The county has more (fiscal) flexibility," he said.

State law requires preparation of a comprehensive fiscal analysis for any proposed new city, a study that spells out how the city will pay for services after incorporation.

When Rancho Santa Margarita incorporated in 2000, Thompson said, two major components of its fiscal analysis were flawed.

"Our (analysis) did not match up with our reality," he said.

Yet, Rancho Santa Margarita, a city that is smaller in area but more densely populated than Wildomar would be, made it work.

"Money will be tight no matter what you do," he said.

Regional economist John Husing, who titled his January economic report "Recession?", said in a recent interview that 2008 could be the first year in 43 years in which the Inland Empire shows negative job growth.

"The fundamentals (for growth) remain in place, but the short term news is not good," he wrote in the report.

Similar verbiage was included in Thompson's analysis last year.

"For purposes of developing a reasonable assessment of future development growth, several factors have been taken into consideration, including current market factors that have driven recent short term slowing in residential development," Thompson wrote.

Both of those statements presuppose that the current slump will be something affecting the area in the short term.

Husing's report states more information as to whether the slump could be long term and extend into a recession will become available in March when the state releases adjusted 2007 jobs data.

Thompson, based on his recent talks with Wildomar area developers, doesn't believe the Wildomar area will suffer from a prolonged slump or recession.

"Absolutely not. When you look at the long-term view, that whole area will take off a lot quicker in a lot of respects," he said.

Contact staff writer Aaron Claverie at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2624, or aclaverie@californian.com.

Next
14 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

JUAN wrote on Jan 25, 2008 7:49 AM:The recession may be a depression. With sales approaching zero, tax revenues will be smaller. The days of overpriced suburban land and homes are over. The American dream is unreachable to more and more. This will result in frustration and increasing hopelessness. The homeless will be living in the shadows of the wealthy. Incorporation for Wildomar should have occurred years ago.

remark wrote on Jan 25, 2008 8:21 AM:The article fails to state that Rancho Santa Margarita enjoys paying over 2% property tax to make their city viable. Wildomar only pays 1.0054% in property taxes. There is a huge distinction between the 2 cities in that the average house in RSM is over $600K compared to Wildomar average house is price $375K in Wildomar.

Gary Thompson’s Fiscal Analyst says that property valuations will increase $1 Billion over the next 2 years, never accounting for the recession we are in. Wildomar, according to Gary Thompson’s CFA is the ONLY place in America that you can buy property right now and it will increase in value over the next 2 years by 14%.

Puzzled wrote on Jan 25, 2008 8:46 AM:Is this a news article or a political ploy that should be labeled an editorial? Is seems that the Californian is trying to argue in favor of cityhood and yet appear to be unbiased. People are not stupid...basic math here folks. Less revenue from taxes means the city, if it becomes one, will have less money for basic services. This certainly will lead to higher taxes, which is the inevitable end to cityhood for Wildomar at this time. Imagine an additional $3000 to $5000 annually in your tax bill. How many more foreclosures will be caused by new city taxes? Talk about a bad idea at the worst time!

Not quite, Puzzled wrote on Jan 25, 2008 9:22 AM:The opinion was clearly that of Gary Thompson, not the author nor the newspaper. Claverie balanced the story with one of the more outspoken cityhood critics, Joe McCabe, and note the tense of the verb in the headline: "As city, Wildomar COULD weather economic slowdown."

Concerned-1 wrote on Jan 25, 2008 9:23 AM:I'm all for government close to the people. However, I'm also for common sense. Drive thruogh this proposed "city" and tell me how they propose to provide services for their residents. There's no "there" there!

To Puzzled wrote on Jan 25, 2008 9:28 AM:Please substantiate the $3,000 to $5,000 annual tax increase. Provide facts on how you came to that number. Also, how was it possible that the increase could happen without your input - and vote? Proposition 218 just will not allow that to happen in California without a vote of the people. Please visit the California Legislative Analysts Office web site to get the correct understanding of prop 218: www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/PubDetails.aspx?id=658 You'll have to copy and paste that address into your browser. It will benefit you, and the community, to know the facts of the matter at hand.

It serves no constructive purpose to continually propound the fears of cityhood. Especially unfounded ones.

To all wrote on Jan 25, 2008 9:35 AM:Gary Thompson has been well-paid for his positive spin on the incorporation of Wildomar, and that is evident in all his interviews. The fact is that we are in a very different economic condition. This is not a slow-down or minor recession, but something far more serious with longterm ramifications. This is not the time to start a new city, especially with a group of self-interested politicians who are already taking brides from the developers.

From Puzzled wrote on Jan 25, 2008 10:09 AM:Most cities in the Inland Valley are paying approximately 1.8% in taxes. We are currently paying around 1%. If the average home in Wildomar is valued at $375,000 assuming tax increases would reach the local average city tax you get a nice number...around $3000 to $5000. Also, I am well aware of Prop 218 and the necessity of voter approval for tax increases. As we have seen throughout the state (just look at L.A.'s "Measure S" currently on the ballot) city leaders often use scare tactics to push voters into approving local tax increases. Not to mention the hidden taxes known as fees (such as our local trash fees) that will be increased to add revenue to the city's coffers. It is most certainly constructive to shed light on the real fiscal issues facing the local taxpayers. People need to be informed of what a vote for cityhood really means.

Concerned-1 wrote on Jan 25, 2008 1:01 PM:Wow, the develpers are getting "brides" from the self-interested politicians? Man, times are changing!

Roberto1 wrote on Jan 25, 2008 5:23 PM:The funny thing is the front runner in the election is a real estate agent.

Wildomar investment broker wrote on Jan 25, 2008 6:52 PM:I have to laugh at the continued drone of the naysayers. Chicken Little would be proud. What is even more funny is that you people don't even know what you are talking about and don't know the first thing about how property taxes are distributed. Maybe you should get educated. All properties in the entire state pay 1% as their basic assessment, which is where the money for cities, schools, water districts, etc., comes from. Anything above that amount is a special assessment for a bond or some other purpose.

The person that compares Rancho Santa Margaritas's 2% rate is not taking into consideration that everything over the 1% basic rate is either Mello Roos bonds or other bonds that were issued by the county long ago to build the roads and other facilities. The city doesn't get that money, and never will. It only gets a share of the 1% basic rate.

You naysayers really should get your facts straight before spewing you BS because you make yourselves look pretty uneducated when you speak without knowledge.

newtechie wrote on Jan 25, 2008 7:37 PM:I thought brides given away was too much too!!, Almost Freudian! As a resident for 15 years and skeptical about city hood now, it is just fuels my skepticism. Especially studying who the main proponents are. I would like to start a business here in the next 6-18 months and I am not sure city hood would help!!

To newtechie wrote on Jan 25, 2008 7:57 PM:So, some of the main proponents are, what? Evil business owners or independent agents - like you state you hope to become? And at this point in time they are somehow the bad guys? What happens if your business gets going and you become successful? You become a bad guy, too? If that's the case, if you are willing to put forth the effort necessary, I hope you become a really bad guy, too!

to the Broke-er wrote on Jan 26, 2008 1:46 PM:Call it a bond, Mello Roos, fees, or an orange for all I care. If I'm forced to pay it by any government official in order to live in my house it's a TAX!

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos