Power-line debate on the horizon

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer
Visual impact of Sunrise is a hot topic | Saturday, January 26, 2008 10:34 PM PST

Picture driving out to Julian along Highway 78 through the bucolic Santa Ysabel Valley with ranches and rolling grasslands stretching into oak- and pine-covered mountains.

Now imagine coming around a bend and seeing high-voltage wires, draped from metal poles more than 100 feet tall, marching across the road.

That is a snapshot of the potential visual impact of the Sunrise Powerlink, a $1.3 billion, 150-mile transmission line a local utility wants to string between Carmel Valley and El Centro.

That effect, and many others, figure to be among the hottest topics at a series of public hearings set for this week across the region.

"The visual impact (in the Santa Ysabel area) will be huge," said Katy Moretti, a Julian resident whose family owns a large ranch in the valley in the path of the wires. "They are just going to destroy the valley."

The wires would also spoil weekend sight-seeing for people driving up the hill from North County cities, she said.

"The drive is not going to be as pretty," she said. "You're going to have a torn-up side of a mountain."

San Diego Gas & Electric Co. officials say they would work to soften their project's visual and other impacts. In some areas, the utility plans to put their wires underground.

A utility spokeswoman also noted that if the transmission line isn't built, the region would still have to rely on local power generation, which has impacts of its own.

Securing the future

Jennifer Briscoe, a spokeswoman for the utility, said the region's demand for electricity is growing continually.

"Something has to be done to secure our region's energy future. We're facing a real energy shortfall in 2010," Briscoe said. "And if it is not Sunrise Powerlink, then something else is going to have to step in and fill that void."

And that something else, whether it be a new power plant on the coast or a different power line, would affect people's lives, she said.

"If it is not a visual impact, it is an air quality impact," said Briscoe. "Each of the alternatives has a construction phase. There is going to be an impact no matter what the solution is."

Several hearings are planned this week in San Diego, Riverside and Imperial counties to discuss the Sunrise line's potential impacts.

State and federal regulatory agencies examined the impact in detail in a 7,000-page environmental impact report early this month.

The agencies -- the California Public Utilities Commission and U.S. Bureau of Land Management -- are expected to decide by late summer whether to give San Diego Gas & Electric permission to build.

A new character

The utility intends to string 91 miles of 500-kilovolt wires between El Centro and the Warner Springs area, crossing Anza-Borrego Desert State Park in the process.

The project also calls for 59 miles of 230-kilovolt wires between Warner Springs and Carmel Valley, passing through Santa Ysabel, Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos.

The wires would hang from towers reaching as high as 160 feet. About 10 miles would be underground.

Project opponents -- people who live in the line's path and environmentalists -- have been saying all along that the wires would transform the backcountry's scenic, pastoral setting.

Opponents also have said the wires could ruin property values in Rancho Penasquitos.

The environmental report underscores opponents' fears in the backcountry, concluding that the line would "introduce substantial industrial character into a predominantly rural-appearing landscape."

The report terms that impact "significant and unavoidable."

At the same time, the report suggests the visual impact in Rancho Penasquitos would be "less than significant" because the project would add a 230-kilovolt line to an urban skyline already marred by similar wires and poles.

The 7,000-page volume also says there would be opportunities for old and new wires to be strung along the same poles.

The underground option

In the backcountry, however, the report suggests it would be difficult, if not impossible, to soften the visual impact for the simple reason that it's hard to hide something that rises more than 100 feet above the ground in areas with few and mostly low-lying structures.

About the only way to preserve treasured views would be to hide wires in the ground, the report said.

San Diego Gas & Electric proposed doing just that in parts of Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos.

The utility did not propose doing that in the Santa Ysabel Valley, but the team studying impacts came up with an alternative of laying about six miles of the line in the ground there to ease concerns about views.

"We're wiling to consider underground alternatives as long as they reduce the environmental impacts," said Briscoe, the utility spokeswoman. But she said digging presents problems, too, because there are many sensitive cultural sites that could be disturbed.

Briscoe said it wasn't favoritism that drove the utility not to propose underground cables there, and to plan to lay wires below the surface in Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos.

Rather, Briscoe said, both areas were selected because of their relatively dense populations. And she said the utility's right of way through Ramona was so narrow that building an overhead line would have required condemning homes.

10 times the cost

For much of the project's 150-mile distance, the utility is trying to follow easements it already possesses, in places where smaller poles and wires already exist.

San Diego Gas & Electric has easements through Rancho Penasquitos, too, but the one the utility chose to follow there currently has no wires, Briscoe said.

And she said utility officials felt that they should not introduce a 230-kilovolt line.

Briscoe said the utility tries to limit use of underground transmission lines because their cost -- $20 million a mile -- is 10 times that of overhead lines.

Even if the underground option were used in the Santa Ysabel Valley, that would be little consolation for Moretti, the woman whose family owns a large ranch on the east side of Highway 79 in the Santa Ysabel Valley. That's because the wires still would be above ground there.

According to the report, the presence of the Elsinore fault would require pulling the line out of the ground a few miles north of the town of Santa Ysabel.

For the Moretti family, that means no matter what, the impact would be severe for the ranch where her 84-year-old father has lived for 76 years, Katy Moretti said.

Moretti said that when utility officials approached the family about the project two years ago, utility officials said they needed a 100-foot easement.

"Now it is 300 feet, the length of a football field," she said. "And they're putting in miles of access roads where there has never been a road before, where a vehicle has never been driven."

That would be a shame, said Denis Trafecanty, who has lived on 50 acres in the valley since 2001.

"A lot of (the valley) doesn't seem like it belongs in California because it is so different, with its meadows and all," Trafecanty said. "It's just such a lovely place."

Where people ride horses

In Ramona, at the end of an underground section, a prominent new tower would rise up out of the ground along San Vicente Road, just west of Chuck Wagon Road near Wildcat Canyon Road.

The tower is depicted in a simulated photograph in the report as a single straight metal pole with a half dozen lines strung from candlelike arms on each side.

Donna Murdoch, president of the 251-home Rancho San Vicente Homeowners Association in Ramona, said that would be a shame, too.

"That's a pretty rustic area, with nice oak trees," Murdoch said. "It's a beautiful area to drive through -- and a beautiful area to live in, too."

And while wires would go underground where she lives, Murdoch isn't thrilled at the thought of a construction staging area going in her neighborhood.

For as long as two years, the report stated, the utility would operate a materials and equipment storage yard at the north end of Gunn Stage Road, at the entrance to the county's Mount Gower Open Space Preserve.

"That's an open-space place where people like to ride their horses," Murdoch said. "There's a horse staging (area) up there. It gets a lot of use."

Joining other wires

The open spaces in the Rancho Penasquitos area would be affected, too, but not as much as the more rural areas to the east, according to the report.

That, the report says, is because the suburban San Diego community is already home to power lines, including a 230-kilovolt line that is similar to the one proposed for the area as part of Sunrise Powerlink.

The report suggested that the impact at the new, upscale Preserve development on Del Mar Mesa was a good case in point.

While poles would be clearly visible from the area's scenic ridge tops, they would be similar to existing poles. And in places wires would be paired up with already existing wires.

"The new structures would be taller but less structurally complex than the H-frame structures they would replace," the report concluded.

The report can be viewed at www.cpuc.ca.gov/Environment/info/aspen/sunrise/sunrise.htm.

The public has until April 11 to make written comments about the report. Those may be sent by e-mail to sunrise@aspeneg.com, or by regular mail to: CPUC/BLM, c/o Aspen Environmental Group, 235 Montgomery St., Suite 935, San Francisco, CA 94104.

Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.

This week's Sunrise Powerlink workshops:

-- El Centro: Monday, Jan. 28, from 12:30 to 2:30 p.m., CalWorks, Meeting rooms B

and C, 2995 S. Fourth St., El Centro 92243.

-- Alpine: Monday, Jan. 28, from 7 to 9 p.m., Alpine Community Center, Sage Room,

1830 Alpine Blvd., Alpine 91901.

-- Temecula: Tuesday, Jan. 29, from 1 to 3 p.m., Community Recreation Center,

Multipurpose Room, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula 92592.

-- Rancho Penasquitos: Tuesday, Jan. 29, from 7 to 9 p.m., Hilltop Recreation

Center, 9711 Oviedo Way, San Diego 92129.

-- Ramona: Wednesday, Jan. 30, from 2 to 4 p.m., Ramona Community Center, 434

Aqua Lane, Ramona 92065

-- Warner Springs: Wednesday, Jan. 30, from 7 to 9 p.m., Warner School cafeteria,

30951 Highway 79, Warner Springs 92086.

-- Pine Valley: Thursday, Jan. 31, from 3:30 to 5:30 p.m. and from 7 to 9 p.m.,

Mountain Empire High School gymnasium, 3305 Buckman Springs Road, Pine Valley

91962.

-- Borrego Springs: Friday, Feb. 1, from 1 to 4 p.m., Borrego Springs High School community room, 2281 Diegueno Road, Borrego Springs, 92004.

12 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Think wrote on Jan 27, 2008 6:17 AM:Spend the extra money and simply run the lines east/west along the Mexican border area.

Dave wrote on Jan 27, 2008 9:05 AM:I still believe that importing electricity puts our state into a bad position. We shoould NOT be looking to buy electricity and subject ourselves to potential blackouts, brownouts, spikes, peak shut off periods, price gouging and the like. We should be building our own generation plants, create jobs for the contractors during construction and then jobs for those that operate and maintain the systems and be independent of outside sources. Look at what is happening to our water supply!

Dave

Sunny wrote on Jan 27, 2008 9:53 AM:I am not willing to let an SDG&E spokesperson define the debate for me, thank you. The alternatives are not confined to either the Power Link or more coastal generating plants. Nanosolar, Inc. has come up with a manufacturing process that delivers wafer-thin flexible panels to home roofs for one third the cost of previous panels.

Rape of Nature for Shareholder Profit wrote on Jan 27, 2008 10:22 AM:That is the justification for raping Borrego Springs State Park

Carter: wrote on Jan 27, 2008 10:26 AM: It is simple a question of doing something other than the line to provide the needed electrical power. One and three tenths billion is a lot of money, and we know that there is that much we can spend. Would it pay to build a plant closer and near by that would produce the power we need? Of course we are trying to improve our breathing air, and how would that effect our area? And how many millions are we willing to pay so the people at Santa Ysabel Valley can have a nice view. Perhaps they can come up with the money for something that will allow them a to maintain their nice view like putting it under ground. How many people in North County do you think have ever been to that particular valley and care about having a nice view there. Looks like there will have be a better arguement than that or they might as well whistle up their sleeve.

burt wrote on Jan 27, 2008 12:14 PM:San Diego has sunshine like other places have oil. Let's capture the local sunshine using our ample roof surface area, and skip the transmission line altogether! That's my kind of progress.

Realist wrote on Jan 27, 2008 1:00 PM:We have growing needs for electricity, even if our population doesn't grow. Solar is very costly (to all of those suggesting it, do you have solar on your roof? I've been looking into it for years, and it's just not cost-effective yet for our family. I love the idea of "green" technology and all that, but the costs are still too high.). We either have to import the electricity, or have local power plants. Those plants need to go somewhere here in San Diego county. Are you willing to have one next to your home or your child's school? Neighbors are fighting the upgrade of the facility in Carlsbad; that's gonna happen with every single power plant put in place locally. I think that we need to have power from a variety of sources, both here in San Diego and from outside of our area. That being said, I absolutely deplore the suggestion that we run cables and power poles through Anza Borrego. Borrego is a jewel belonging to all Californians (present and future), and should be protected from this sort of thing. Surely there are other options; relocation of the powere lines or undergrounding. SDGE hasn't made a good case for stringing power lines through a state park with one of the few unobstructed views of the sky in our county.

In the meantime, we all need to conserve. Switch out those old light bulbs, turn off the unused computer and turn down the thermostat!

burt wrote on Jan 27, 2008 1:52 PM:Well, Realist, yes I do have solar on my roof. I believe that we vote the loudest with our dollars, and that not every purchase is about spending the least amount of money. I buy organic produce because it is better for me and the world, not because it's the cheapest. When I’m shopping for products, I consider where they are manufactured and if I like supporting their economy more than my local one. When I buy solar equipment, I support the creation of jobs and products that use solar energy because I know that over time increasing demand will cause better, more efficient and less expensive products and services to appear, while supporting our local contractors to do something other than build concrete and steel power lines to haul sun from the desert to here, where we already have all the sun we need. By the way, my 12 panel roof top solar provides 100% of the power requirements for my 22 cubic foot fridge, all CF lights and computer, coffee maker, blender, toaster, LCD projector and stereo, central heating fan, and even air compressor. It will be a long time before I make money back from my system, but I know that I am doing what I can to make our little corner of the world a little better.

Karl wrote on Jan 27, 2008 4:31 PM:burt, any tips on shopping for solar? I am in the market now and will purchase sometime this year. Any help would be appreciated. I got a few tips from Double D's earlier, nothing speaks louder than the voice of experience.

Backcountry wrote on Jan 27, 2008 6:31 PM:Hey Carter get a clue and read the EIR, it is not just the visual impact of Santa Ysabel. It is destroying the ranchers ability to make a living, it is destroying animal and bird habitat. It is destroying 100 year old oak trees and cultural sites. Quite frankly a million dollors to save Santa Ysabel is a BARGAIN !!

to Karl wrote on Jan 27, 2008 8:34 PM:Buy your equipment in AZ, it is worth the trip to save on sales tax, they do not tax solar equipment in AZ. Install it yourself, the installers will rip you off coming and going. It is easy to do. My out of pocket for a 3kw system was 11,000 dollars

burt wrote on Jan 27, 2008 10:07 PM:Outback power systems makes a great mppt charge controller/grid interface package; AZ has sun too and they know their business; if you are handy it is possible to do most of the installation yourself except for the grid connection. Read the rules and check out the rebates, too.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos