Threats to imported water supplies make clouds welcome sight

By: GIG CONAUGHTON - North County Times | Monday, January 28, 2008 10:06 PM PST

SAN DIEGO COUNTY - Local water officials and farmers looked out their windows Monday and said recent rains here and snow to the north could actually boost San Diego County's water supplies.

That prediction is obvious but more complicated than it appears.

In most years, pouring rains would have little direct effect on local water supplies.

Even in the wettest years, eight out of every 10 glasses of water in San Diego County has to be imported from the Colorado River and Northern California. Rains collected in the region's meager reservoirs provide only a small portion of local supplies.

This year, however, the region could lose up to 30 percent of its supplies from Northern California because of a court ruling to protect an endangered fish.

Because of that, water officials are hoping that rains will keep local residents from watering lawns and gardens for weeks. That will help keep backup stores filled and ready to be tapped when hotter weather arrives.

Local farmers already have suffered mandatory 30 percent cutbacks. They signed deals to buy water at discounted rates in return for taking the first supply cuts in emergencies.

But the recent rains are helping them. If farmers don't use all the water they're allowed now, they'll be allowed to use it later this year - in hot months when there will be little rain.

"For us, this is like pennies from heaven," Escondido avocado grower Mike Hillebrecht said of the rains Monday. He said his farm hadn't had to use any water from the system since Jan. 1.

Gary Arant, general manager of the Valley Center Municipal Water District, which serves hundreds of farmers, said the district had sold a lot less water this year than a year ago because of the rains.

"In December of 2006, we delivered just over 2,000 acre feet," Arant said. "This year it was about 860 acre feet. That's a significant drop, and I'm sure it's connected to farmers taking advantage of the rain."

An acre foot of water is 325,900 gallons, enough to sustain two households for a year.

Officials from the San Diego County Water Authority said the rains also could help local residents by protecting backup stores of water in huge reservoirs like Temecula's Diamond Valley Lake - but only if they heeded calls and turned off sprinklers and watering systems.

Water Authority officials said that, so far this month, 3.26 inches of rain had fallen at Lindbergh Field. That was 60 percent more than the average January total of 2.05 inches.

Even so, the recent rains have brought the county's overall rain totals to roughly their average.

"Don't put any water on your lawn," said Ken Weinberg, the Water Authority's water resource manager. "Because of that federal (court) ruling, we're not going to be able to bring as much water down as we used to (from Northern California). That means being efficient with water supplies and maintaining storage is really important."

Weinberg and others said all of Southern California faces big water supply questions for the foreseeable future.

They revolve around how much water can be shipped through the State Water Project - the 600 mile series of reservoirs, dams, pipelines and pumping stations that deliver Northern California water south to the rest of the state.

That supply comprised two-thirds of Southern California's imported water supplies in 2007.

But in August, a federal court ruled that the pumps in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta - the heart of the State Water Project - must be cut back in 2008 to protect the endangered delta smelt, a tiny fish.

Because of that, supplies could be cut to Southern California by as much as 30 percent - depending on many factors, including how much water is actually in the State Water Project to start with.

State water officials said Monday that just as rains have been falling in Southern California, snow has been falling in the Sierra mountains. That should boost Northern California supplies in the delta.

Maury Roos, a hydrologist with California's Department of Water Resources, said Monday that electronic sensors estimate the Sierra snowpack as slightly better this year than in 2007, about 110 percent of average for January. The resources agency runs the State Water Project.

"Things look good for the first of the month," Roos said. "We've more than doubled the snowpack."

Roos said resources officials will take new field measurements Thursday, and could increase the paltry supply estimates the agency released in November.

At that time, resources officials predicted that Northern California supplies would cover just 25 percent of demand in 2008 - far less than the 60 percent the region got in 2007.

Roos said the recent snows were good news for the system.

But he and other officials said the court ruling still hangs like a cloud over the water-supply picture.

No one will know until later this spring how much the federal court ruling will cut into the State Water Project's supplies.

"That's a limit we haven't had before," Roos said.

Contact staff writer Gig Conaughton at (760) 739-6696 or gconaughton@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
11 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

MJ wrote on Jan 29, 2008 4:21 AM:Delta Smelt 1
SoCal 0

Pathetic

Ira: wrote on Jan 29, 2008 4:36 AM: Tell me again Sam!

Joseph wrote on Jan 29, 2008 5:37 AM:I do not want to hurt anyones feelings , but San Diego conty has no aquifier( huge underground natural reservoir). The water must be imported or processed from seawater.

Oh Oh wrote on Jan 29, 2008 7:38 AM:Less water being sold means higher rates soon so they can continue to pay the salaries of incompetent managers that can't get us water. They have known this was coming for years yet they chose to do nothing.

O Goody wrote on Jan 29, 2008 7:46 AM:More water for more development.

Concerned-1 wrote on Jan 29, 2008 8:14 AM:The rains have definitely helped in the short term as the story reflects. We have been experiencing extended years of drought in California and in the Colorado River Basin. The consensus among water experts is that one wet year can not make up for eight dry years.

Boy to think wrote on Jan 29, 2008 9:31 AM:one judge and a bunch of fishes can make all of southern california suffer.

Herb wrote on Jan 29, 2008 10:06 AM:I really don't get it. If a 30% cut back is mandatory for farmers why are you paying them for it with discount rates? Furthermore, If they can work with 30% less water why don't they stop wasting and do it all the time? In addition, how does the snow pack relate to the snow pack of ten years ago? Is it improving or disappearing? You are telling me about this year and maybe next year, but what about five years from now while the population is still allowed to increase? How about some answers out beyond our nose.

Concerned-1 wrote on Jan 29, 2008 12:49 PM:It's true that the environmental lobby has run amuck. The judge's decision is being challenged. According to MWD, there is no consensus on why the Delta Smelt is dwindling. It could be from the non-native mussels in the delta, as well as the pumps. Hopefully, rational thinking will prevail.

Alf wrote on Jan 29, 2008 5:25 PM:Well, "Herb" at 10:06AM, a question. If you get all your irrigation "maxed-out" in terms of efficiency, if you have cut back to the "bare-bones" minimum that you can do and still have a profit on your harvest (or if you are a "mere" homeowner and you are also "maxed-out" in terms of conservation) you have cut your own throat when any across-the-board mandatory cut-back occurs, because you have nothing left to cut except your crop or your throat, is that a just or wise thing? While there is always some way to reduce the use of water, this idea of strict percentage cutbacks without regard for or consideration to previous reduction and conservation measures is wrong. A point to ponder. Regards, Alf.

Herb: wrote on Jan 29, 2008 8:14 PM: Well Alf, being an efficient and professional farmer involves using just the water you need not only when our water supply is low but all the time. Waste is waste regardless of what the water availability is. If you can do it during our drought periods you can do it all the time. And don't talk the politics of dodging cut backs. Tell me what you are going to do about it. If what you say is the case, you are wasting water during the good times so you will have 30% to let them cut. You are telling me that you and the water authority do not know how much water is required for a crop of apples in Julian during dry periods, And you are intentionally bumping up your waste during the good times and padding the books preparing for for the bad times. That don't make no sense! Come on board, get involved and watch that waste.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos