Iraqis to be questioned in Haditha killings

By: MARK WALKER - Staff Writer
CBS resisting prosecution effort to obtain '60 Minutes' tapes | Monday, February 4, 2008 10:31 AM PST

Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich
BILL WECHTER North County Times File Photo
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery


CAMP PENDLETON ---- A military judge on Friday upheld an order directing prosecutors in the case against Marine Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich to travel to Iraq to interview witnesses in the 2005 slaying of 24 civilians.

The judge, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Meeks, turned aside an argument from Wuterich's attorneys, who said that motion hearings and preparing for the scheduled March 3 start of their client's court-martial make an Iraq trip problematic.

It was also disclosed during a hearing at the base that the government is seeking outtakes from a CBS "60 Minutes" interview of Wuterich broadcast last year. CBS is resisting a subpoena for those film clips and its attorneys may have to argue the issue in a Camp Pendleton courtroom.

During the interview, Wuterich gave his account of a roadside bombing that killed a Marine and injured two others and the subsequent search for the attackers by him and his squad that resulted in the civilian deaths in Haditha.

While expressing regret over the civilian deaths, Wuterich maintained throughout the interview that he and his men from Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment followed their training and did nothing wrong.

Those killed included several women and children. At least two children who survived or witnessed part of the incident are among the Iraqis who prosecutors want to interview.

Wuterich's attorneys want the Iraqis to be brought to the United States or be required to tell their story during the trial by video hookup.

"We want to be able to confront the witnesses in person and allow the jurors to ask questions," one of Wuterich's military attorneys, Lt. Col. Colby Vokey, said after the hearing. Unlike civilian courts, the military justice system permits jurors to question witnesses.

Prosecutors have said that the Iraqis refuse to come to the U.S., but have agreed to speak with attorneys if they traveled to Iraq.

It was not immediately clear Friday if any of Wuterich's five attorneys ---- three military and two civilian ---- will travel to Iraq. His lead attorney, Neal Puckett, said he could not comment because of security reasons.

Three other Marines face courts-martial this year in connection with the incident. Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum is scheduled to stand trial March 28 for two counts of involuntary manslaughter in the deaths of two children. Tatum also faces charges of reckless endangerment and aggravated assault.

The battalion commander at Haditha, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, faces trial for dereliction of duty for failing to order an investigation into the deaths.

Also facing court-martial is 1st Lt. Andrew Grayson, an intelligence officer who is accused of obstruction of justice for ordering the destruction of photos of the victims. He also is accused of making a false official statement.

Like Wuterich, all of the accused maintain their innocence.

Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.

3 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

Mom of Marine wrote on Feb 2, 2008 1:02 AM:Is this article saying that Prosecutors still need to "interview witnesses?" I would have thought that would have been what they (NCIS/Prosecutors) were supposed to be doing in the initial investigation back when this happened. The Iraqi's "refuse" to come here where they can also be questioned by the DEFENSE and the jury (go figure) and all of this interviewing needs to be translated. Not to mention that these children have had YEARS now to be coached for any interviews. Is the judge also "directing" the DEFENSE ATTYS. to go to Iraq and be part of this investigation, with their own translators? That would only be fair! More of the same bulloney as with the other cases. The defense is not allowed to defend. These Marines were under attack and defended themselves! Let's see...how many civilians were killed today when the enemy strapped bombs on two women with Downe's Syndrome, sent them to market places and detinated them? 73 was it? I'm sure these two women had no clue what was about to happen to them...becasue this enemy cares so much about their women and children...yeah right! Accidental civilian casualties have ALWAYS been part of war.And we need to stop paying them for it...My gosh EVERY insurgent now has a family member or two killed by our Marines.(that's their story...and thier sticking to it...no matter how big of a lie it is.) The enemy DOES IT ON PURPOSE...with intention of killing as many they can. Let these men go...and start letting the Marines DO THEIR JOBS! And their job is...eliminating the enemy...even whey the enemy hides behind women and children. When Zarkowi was killed I didn't hear anything about any civilians that were killed...it was "we got him"...and cheering!

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Feb 2, 2008 8:35 PM:Seems that the prosecution has forgotten that the little girl (Safa Younis?) said she knew there was going to be an explosion, RE: IED! She also said she didn't see the faces of the ones firing weapons; she only saw the guns. Then she asked an Iraqi why he was killing her people. The "Iraqi" "told her" it was the Americans. The Washington Post' (Iraqi stringers) and Time's (Iraqi stringers) had these interviews. The prosecution gets its ammunition to persecute from NCIS. So! Where was NCIS? How did we get from her story to an entirely different version for courts-martial?

And this too wrote on Feb 3, 2008 11:41 AM:Lt.Col. Jeffery Meeks was also a judge for one of the CP8. He didn't order any prosecutors (or anyone else to go to Iraq and interview any so called "witnesses." Why is that? Geeez. I guess no need to ask. Because there may have been something to DEFEND the CP8 with.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos