Hearing kicks off week of power-line talk

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer
Supporters, opponents square off over Sunrise Powerlink's impact on global warming | Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:40 AM PST

Ruben Barrales co-chair of the Community Alliance for the Sunrise Powerlink and president of the San Diego Chamber of Commerce, talks at a rally for the Sunrise Powerlink before the Public Utilities Commission hearing at the San Diego County building on Monday. In the background, opponents of SDG&E's proposed power line have their say.
JAMIE SCOTT LYTLE Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery

SAN DIEGO -- More than 200 people jammed county offices in downtown San Diego and close to half of them spoke Monday as the California Public Utilities Commission convened three days of public hearings on the Sunrise Powerlink, a 150-mile power line that would run through the North County backcountry.

Opponents of San Diego Gas & Electric Co.'s proposed $1.3 billion project outnumbered supporters two to one. And two prominent county officials -- Supervisors Ron Roberts and Dianne Jacob -- were on opposite ends of the issue.

"There are cleaner and cheaper ways to keep the lights on in our county," Jacob said.

But Roberts said the line is the best way to bring in affordable, clean power.

The hearing was the first of five this week that followed the January release of a 7,000-page report examining the project's potential environmental impacts. The commission is expected to decide by late summer whether to grant SDG&E permission to build the line.

Supporters, many of them business leaders, held a rally on the steps of the county administration building, with the waters of San Diego Bay providing a blue backdrop for their green T-shirts that read: "Reduce global warming, support the Sunrise Powerlink."

The red-hot global warming issue was a central theme, as was California's state mandate for utilities such as SDG&E to secure 20 percent of their supplies from clean, nonfossil-fuel power by 2010.

Supporters such as San Marcos Mayor Jim Desmond argued before the commission that the power line, which would run from El Centro to Carmel Valley and pass the Salton Sea, represents the best chance to meet the state mandate and do something locally about global warming. Energy experts have said the Salton Sea area has the potential to supply a huge amount of power from the sun and underground geysers.

"The renewable energy is out in the desert and we all want to live here on the coast," Desmond said.

Supporters emphasized that wires through the mountains and desert would be preferable to natural-gas-fired power plants on the coast.

"We reject an alternative that would require fossil-fuel-burning power plants to be built or to remain in San Diego County," said Ruben Barrales, president and chief executive officer for the San Diego Chamber of Commerce, during the rally.

Inside the building, opponents said a better way to meet the state's 2010 green-energy deadline would be to install solar panels on rooftops of San Diego County's largest businesses.

Besides, they said, the October wildfires showed power brought in on wires isn't as secure as electricity generated locally.

During the fires, both of the region's major transmission lines -- one that runs along the coast and the one that runs east along Interstate 8 to Arizona -- were knocked out by wind-fanned flames.

According to utility officials, the lines were moments away from being out at the same time.

"We've had two catastrophic fires in the last four years," said Denis Trafecanty, a distance runner who owns a ranch in Santa Ysabel and strongly opposes the proposed transmission line. "You can put all the power lines you want in the backcountry and they'll all be down during a fire."

Laura Copic, a member of the Carmel Valley Community Planning Board, said the bottom line is "local generation is what kept the lights on during the October wildfires."

But Reed Vickerman, vice president of corporate operations for Amylin Pharmaceuticals in San Diego, said local green projects, by themselves, can't generate enough electricity to either meet the region's growing needs or comply with the state mandate.

Vickerman said his company, as much as anyone, believes in rooftop solar and has installed 6,000 square feet of panels on one of its buildings. But, he said, those panels provide less than 30 percent of that building's energy needs.

Based on his firm's experience, Vickerman said, San Diego County needs more than panels -- it needs a power line.

SDG&E's plan to run that line through Anza-Borrego, the nation's largest state park outside Alaska, was once again a lightning rod.

"It's everybody's backyard," said Joe Raffetto, owner of California Overland Desert Excursions, a concessionaire that provides park tours.

But Steve Kildoo, a kitchen-cabinet designer from San Marcos who lives across the street from a large power line, suggested most opponents don't want the project simply because they would have to look at it.

"Opposing it because it will go in your backyard is not good enough, because the rest of us who have lived here a while already have this in our backyards," Kildoo said.

-- Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Remaining public hearings on the Sunrise Powerlink:

  • Borrego Springs: 1 p.m. today at Borrego Springs Resort, De Anza Room, 1112 Tilting Drive

  • Ramona: 7 p.m. today at Charles Nunn Performing Arts Center, 1520 Hanson Lane

  • Julian: 10:30 a.m. Wednesday at Julian Town Hall, 2129 Main St.

    Next Previous
  • Bookmark and Share

    Advertisement

    Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

    Mark Stiefel wrote on Feb 26, 2008 4:13 AM:I've read about the threat of wildfires, but has anyone at SDG&E or Sempra addressed the potential exposure and threat of the lines becoming terrorist targets? What do they propose to do to keep the lines secure? What will the cost be to do so? Will the maintenance crews be armed and on watch 24/7? What does the DEIR say about it? Disrupting power from thousands of small targets would be much more difficult than one large one.

    Power corrupts ! wrote on Feb 26, 2008 6:40 AM:It is too bad that the proponents of the "Sunrise Powerlink, many of whom are ardent in their views, are members of the Sempra Fan Club. We have people speaking for the proposal that have a hidden agenda. Those who oppose the Sunrise Powerlink are not just a bunch of wackos, but are really deeply concerned and see that the SDG&E monopoly has gotten out of control. Try to insist that you do not deserve a demand meter on ONE machine ! Try to request an audit that makes sense ! For those who do not believe that solar can help, take a really good look at all of the users of solar. Many have lots of excess power to sell back to the utility, but they have that figured out too. They will NEVER cut a check to anyone REGARDLESS of how much power they create. What is sad, from an objective point of view, is the blending of Sunrise Powerlink and reducing greenhouse gasses. If SDG&E/SEMPRA were really concerned, they would not be importing their "hot gas" and refusing to "scrub" it to make it less dangerous. They say they don't have to because the gas is imported. So much for reducing greenhouse gasses. So much for the health of the citizens. Too bad. " Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely" And with Sunrise Powerlink, it sure does !

    DD Wiz wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:17 AM:We do not need more power lines destroying sensitive environmental habitats and setting off fires when the wind blows. The article states that this boondoggle will cost 1.3 BILLION dollars! Most residences could install solar covering their entire electric bill, as mine did, for less than $30,000 after existing credits. This 1.5 BILLION could completely pay for more than 40,000 homes to install rooftop solar, or 80,000 to add additional credits covering half the out-of-pocket expense for those just needing a little more incentive. Rooftop solar provides the most additional energy, locally generated, when the sun is shining and people are turning on their air conditioners. The energy companies are terrified of losing control of long-distance transmission.

    michael a. wrote on Feb 26, 2008 9:40 AM:SUNRISE POWER LINK IS A GREAT THING.

    I am an environmentalist. BIG TIME. And I support the Sunrise Power Link. (The media routinely simplifies debates like this one). The power line will connect San Diego to massive Geothermal and Solar Thermal power plants being built in the Imperial Valley.

    Sunrise Power Link would be a huge step forward in our battle against Global Warming. And, it would strengthen our economy because renewable power NEVER goes away.

    San Diego would become one of the largest cities in the world getting a huge portion of its power from clean safe affordable and reliable renewable energy.

    If we don't act NOW to slow global warming, many of the rare plant and animal species that make San Diego County so special will go extinct.

    The benefits of the Sunrise Power Link far outweigh the environmental and aesthetic costs of a carefully planed power line.

    Kelly wrote on Feb 26, 2008 6:02 PM:Actually, when the California Public Utilties Commission analyzed the environmental impacts of the Sunrise Powerlink project, it found that the Powerlink would increase global warming, not decrease it, because of greenhouse gas emissions during construction and a potent greenhouse gas leaking out of the equipment over the life of the trnasmission line. This information is in the Environmental Impact Report, which has been available since early January. It makes those who call themselves environmentalists look very uninformed when they claim the Powerlink will slow global warming.

    Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

    Advertisement

    Videos