State law could mean more P.E. for high-schoolers
By: NOELLE IBRAHIM - Staff Writer
SMUSD preparing for change | ∞
SAN MARCOS ---- Some San Marcos students may have to take up to four years of physical education if they fail a state fitness test in high school, under a new law that aims to help California students develop healthy habits.
"I think we're realizing in California that it's even more important for your mental health to be physically healthy," said Nancy Peterson, San Marcos Unified School District's director of secondary curriculum.
More than 9 million children and adolescents nationwide are overweight or obese ---- about four times as many as in 1965 ---- and 23 percent get no exercise, according to the American Heart Association.
Most obese children have at least one major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, such as high blood cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin or blood pressure. And, for the first time in history, children's life spans are predicted to be less than their parents' life spans because of inactivity and obesity-related illnesses, according to the association.
"This generation is so oriented toward video games, watching TV and other sedentary activities," said San Marcos Middle School physical education teacher Tom Schwartz. "If (the law) motivates students to become healthier at a younger age, it makes a lot of sense."
Focus on fitness
Prompted by those statistics, the new law, which goes into effect with this year's freshmen class, is geared toward students who have room for improvement on the statewide physical fitness test ---- the so-called Fitnessgram.
The test is designed to measure categories such as muscle strength, endurance, flexibility and aerobic capacity, the body's ability to generate energy with the use of oxygen.
Results of the test are reported each year in grades five, seven and nine, and are based on students' performance in six tasks: curl-ups, trunk lifts, push-ups or pull-ups, shoulder stretches, body composition and a 1-mile run.
While students are required to take two years of physical education to graduate high school, the new law requires students who do not pass at least five of the six tasks on the test in ninth grade to continue to enroll in physical education until they pass, Peterson said. Physical education is not required after the sophomore year, but students can still take it as an elective.
"You get one shot at this a year," said Peterson, adding that the test must be administered between now and May. "It could very well mean students have to stay in P.E. all four years."
For the 2006-07 school year, 43.4 percent of 447,676 ninth-graders tested in the state did not pass at least five of the six tasks, meaning they did not score within or above what is deemed the healthy fitness zone ---- the level of fitness thought to offer protection against diseases that result from sedentary living, according the state department of education's Web site.
In comparison, 36.6 percent of the 1,209 San Marcos ninth-graders tested last year did not achieve at least five of the six standards and 7.1 percent achieved none of the standards.
Effects on students
Overall, Peterson said she expects the number of ninth-graders passing the standards to rise with the implementation of the new rule. Many students weren't taking the test seriously before, she said.
"It wasn't really a high-stakes test because there were no repercussions if they didn't pass," she said. "Now they're paying more attention to it."
Peterson said she expects students to be more motivated to pass the fitness test so they can take elective classes such as art, drama, band and technology in place of physical education.
"You want to kids to be connected to school," she said. "Elective classes many times are what keep kids interested."
Gary Munn, San Marcos Middle School's athletic director and physical education department chair, said he thinks some students will respond to the change. For other families who don't understand why physical education is a part of the school day, the change will not be an easy sell, Munn said.
"They're concentrating on getting their kids into college and they see this as an obstacle," he said. "But (students) need to be healthy. It's a double-edged sword."
Peterson said schools have always taken on the physical well-being of students as part of their responsibility to help students be well-rounded. A lot of skills are taught on the field, such as teamwork and self-esteem, she said.
Preparing for change
Students and parents have been notified of the new requirement by letter, and physical education teachers have talked to their students about the importance of taking the test seriously, Peterson said.
"It isn't just a high school issue," she said. "Students build the skills they need to pass."
To help students succeed, the district has been analyzing results and identifying components of the test that kids tend to struggle with, such as the 1-mile run, which tests aerobic capacity, and the shoulder touch, which measures flexibility. Teachers can target those problem areas in their lesson plans and activities, she said.
Also, in January, San Marcos Middle opened a new grant-funded fitness facility with training bikes, stationary elliptical machines ---- used to simulate walking or running ---- and workout-tracking technology.
The two-room facility is being used by students who fail four assessment activities based on the Fitnessgram ---- the mile run, flexed arm hang, shoulder touch and body composition.
About 12 to 15 students each period are using the facility in place of a regular physical education class, said Munn. The targeted instruction will help students build their cardiovascular strength and give them a better chance of passing the test by the time they are freshmen, he said.
Though the district is sharpening its focus on the health and wellness of its students, budget difficulties are making that tough.
This week officials recommended laying off 10 elementary physical education teachers and 21 aides ---- classroom teachers would take on the responsibility of teaching physical education ---- and canceling after-school middle school athletics in an effort to reduce a $9 million budget deficit in the upcoming school year. That shortfall would be caused in part by across-the-board cuts to education funding proposed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
"It flies in the face of everything we're doing in trying to get kids more fit," Munn said.
Peterson said it is unfortunate to include athletics in a long list of proposed budget cuts, but principals are looking for ways to continue those opportunities.
Contact staff writer Noelle Ibrahim at (760) 740-3517 or nibrahim@nctimes.com.
Floyd wrote on Mar 2, 2008 12:07 AM:Several years ago, PE was cut drastically due to budget cuts. Now the schools are suddenly discovering that decision is causing unhealthy students. Instead of placing the onus on video games and television, they need to be honest and admit it's a problem they created themselves.
? wrote on Mar 2, 2008 6:06 AM:But they are cutting PE at lower levels?
Catch-22 wrote on Mar 2, 2008 8:27 AM:I have seen evidence that students who exercise do better in school, however, as a teacher in a "low-performing" school, the insane focus on standardized testing has all but eliminated P.E.
Our district and school is so fearful of being "punished" under NCLB that all we do is teach only the two subjects on the tests (Language Arts & Math) and teach "test-taking skills" (read: teaching to the test).
So what do we choose: more PE and healthier kids or better test scores?-
jessie wrote on Mar 31, 2008 8:05 AM:School is a big part of why we have so much obesity. They need to have more p.e. classes not just every other day. They also need to take fitness every year and not just the freshman year(pepperell that i know of). They also need to have snack machines that sell protein bars or any kind of snack that is healthy. Oh and one more thing they need to get a course at the technical high school on personal training and nutrition.
PinnLion wrote on Apr 4, 2008 6:11 PM:I think that pressuring students to do better in p.e. is ridiculus. Students need to be taught how to preform better in class without having to be stressed to either pass p.e. or not. Just because someone can't pass the mile run or the push ups doesn't mean they're are not physically active. I do not like this rule and do not believe in it at all. :(
Desiree wrote on Apr 17, 2008 12:48 PM:As an 11th grader i think it is really dumb that they are pestering us with this fitness bull. We have others things to worry about...like passing the TAKS Test so we can graduate and won't have to worry about the new dumb laws...
Phillip wrote on Apr 21, 2008 5:04 PM:wow. about time someone pulls there head out. worry about exams blah i remember when they pushed for 3 years and we griped. sad thing is they still don't do what pe should be doing. instead they let people sit around and do nothing. anyway pe should be mandatory. so should healthy education. teach the kids on how to eat. maybe then we can concentrate on whats really needed which is a healthy body also leads to a healthy mind. instead we put so much pressure on the kid they fail to remember they are kids and need to have fun. and instead of cutting programs cut the BS. band, football, basketball, field hockey, cut the clubs from the school. forget if vista still does year round schooling but that should still be in effect.
if the parents want thier kids in sports then let them pay for it. i shouldnt have to.
sherry wrote on Jun 8, 2008 9:04 AM:Children are sitting on the floor in classrooms of north county high schools, and we are worried about PE?
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement

