Navy, environmentalists fighting over war-game restrictions

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | Saturday, March 1, 2008 10:03 PM PST

Military officials now know how far they must go to protect whales and dolphins from the ear-splitting sonar that the Navy employs in offshore war games.

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday to uphold a January district court judge's ruling that limits the sonar's use off California's coast. The limits came after President Bush had intervened in an attempt to shield the Navy from any judicial restrictions.

The Navy's next anti-submarine exercise is scheduled for the middle of this month off the San Diego County coast.

The Navy contends that the integrity of its anti-submarine warfare training was placed in jeopardy by limits imposed by the district court's decision. But the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, maintains it simply forces the military to train in a way that doesn't harm the ocean or its inhabitants.

At places such as Spain, Greece, the Bahamas, Hawaii and Washington state in recent years, dozens of whales have become stranded on beaches and died following sonar exercises.

A federal judge in Hawaii approved similar sonar limits for that state Friday.

So far, no such beachings of marine mammals have been linked to sonar in Southern California.

But federal officials are investigating whether the death of a Northern Pacific right whale dolphin that beached itself on San Nicholas Island in late January was connected to the Navy's last major exercise in the area.

Part of the Channel Islands, San Nicholas is west of Santa Catalina Island.

"The Navy clearly does not want to be told what to do," said Joel Reynolds, senior attorney for the council in Los Angeles and director of its Marine Mammal Protection Project, in a telephone interview Thursday. "They want to decide what to do, and they want the court to stay out of the way. But that is not how the court system works in this country. The president is bound by the law and so is the Navy."

Navy officials at the San Diego headquarters of its 3rd Fleet, which will be conducting the exercise this month, declined to comment on the case last week other than to say they were waiting to see what the appeals court would decide.

As realistic as possible
Earlier this year, in an interview at the headquarters, an official stressed that the Navy has no intention of harming wildlife and is simply trying to provide the type of training that will prepare sailors for the situations they could encounter in Asia and the Middle East.

"You want your training to be as realistic as possible," said Navy Capt. Neil May. "You train like you fight."

May also said that the rules the judge imposed appear to be unnecessarily restrictive, given the Navy's track record in Southern California.

"There hasn't been one single incident attributed to us using midfrequency sonar in 40 years of using it here," he said.

But that doesn't mean California is immune to the threat that has been blamed for deaths all around the world, environmentalists and scientists said.

"It's a big ocean out there, and in most cases if something is going wrong, we won't see it," Reynolds said.

Ken Balcomb, a scientist with the Center for Whale Research in Friday Harbor, Wash., and member of a former committee that advised the federal government on marine mammals' response to sound, said that there have been beachings in Southern California. It's just that none of them have been connected to sonar, he said.

And the dolphin death could prove to be the first, Balcomb said.

For now, said Jim Milbury, spokesman for the National Marine Fisheries Service in Long Beach, "It's still inconclusive as to what the cause was."

Friday's sonar ruling was triggered by the latest in a long string of lawsuits that the Natural Resources Defense Council has filed against the Navy over the matter over the last decade and a half.

It was the first time that any of those suits has reached an appeals court. And the most recent case may go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Hiding in shallow water
In January, the case was marked by the highly unusual move by President Bush to excuse the Navy from having to follow some federal environmental laws, in a bid to overturn restrictions.

But U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper in Los Angeles left the restrictions in place.

Consequently, the Navy is barred from using sonar in a 12-mile band along the Southern California coast and in an underwater canyon stretching from Santa Catalina Island off Orange County to the Navy-owned San Clemente Island west of San Diego. The canyon is a densely populated haven for marine mammals.

In addition, in areas where the Navy is allowed to practice with sonar, it will have to power down when whales or dolphins are spotted swimming a little more than a mile away and turn the sonar off if they get as close as two football fields.

The power-down requirement "really hamstrings us," the Navy's May said.

And he said the prohibition against training within 12 miles of the shore makes it difficult for sailors to train in coastal waters, where they learn how to distinguish the sound signature of enemy submarines from the numerous echoing noises in shallow seas.

"Diesel subs love to hide in that stuff," May said.

He suggested that listening for submarines in shallow waters is "like going to a rock concert and trying to hear an asp that's sneaking up on you to bite you."

However, finding those enemy submarines entails shooting powerful sound waves through the water that approaches 235 decibels initially and remains above 160 decibels a mile away, scientists say.

Causing a stampede
"It's phenomenally loud, louder than the sounds than you would associate with a rocket lifting off," said Balcomb, of the Center for Whale Research.

When whales or dolphins are nearby, their instinct is to try to get away from the sound, he said. And if the deep-diving animals race to the surface in a frantic rush, they can harm themselves.

"We're basically causing a stampede," Balcomb said of sonar's effect. "They throw caution to the wind. They feel like they have to get up to the surface, so they get up to the surface as fast as they can and they get the bends."

Just as a scuba diver gets the bends if he or she surfaces too fast, gas bubbles in marine mammals' blood vessels enlarge as they come up and sometimes rupture the delicate vessels in the brain and ears, Balcomb said.

"And they black out and die," he said.

That's what happened when 17 beaked whales stranded themselves on the beach in the Bahamas during a sonar exercise in March 2000, said Balcomb, who had been tracking the mammals. He said that at least 11 whales died.

While some have suggested it is the beaching that triggers death in such situations, Balcomb said that the 2000 incident argues otherwise. He said three of the 11 whales that died were still in the water, indicating that the injuries brought on by expanding gas bubbles were the cause.

Similar injuries may have been to blame for the dolphin's death in January, he said, as blood and other fluid had been found in its ears.

Still, federal officials say there are other possible explanations. For the example, the fluid could be the result of parasites, Milbury said.

Turning up the volume
Scientists' explanation for the sonar impact is largely the result of the beachings that have occurred during military exercises, said Brandon Southall, fisheries biologist and director of the acoustics program for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Silver Spring, Md.

"The problem with that is, you don't know where the animals were when they heard the sound initially," Southall said, in a telephone interview Thursday.

With that in mind, the federal government launched a first-of-its-kind study in August to monitor the reactions of 21 species of deep-diving beak whales to varying levels of sonar sound in a controlled setting, at an underwater military range in the Bahamas, he said. Scientists from all over the country are teaming up on the experiment that is taking advantage of 82 microphones attached to the bottom of the ocean, under a mile or more of water, in a 600-square-mile area.

Southall said that scientists, who are working primarily in summer, are turning up the volume slowly on purpose to avoid harming whales and can't exceed 170 decibels under their research permit. The last thing they want, he said, is to trigger a beaching.

At the same time, he said, they want to get a handle on what levels of sound are harmful.

"It's a difficult balance to try and test something that you know in certain circumstances can trigger strong reactions. So you want to go slow," Southall said. "But you don't want to go too slow. ... We're trying to get answers as quickly as possible, but as carefully as possible."

Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Next
13 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

MJ wrote on Mar 2, 2008 1:59 AM:Prediction. The reversal rate for the 9th Circuit at the Supreme Court is about 70%. The Supremes are likely at grant Cert, stay the 9th's ruling and reverse. Done. In the meantime, a bunch of lawyers will make a ton of cash at the expense of the taxpayers. Get a life guys, and get a real job.

Vista Granny wrote on Mar 2, 2008 7:29 AM:Do we know of another country which is capable of submarine warfare at this time? Are submarines really necessary, except to launch nuclear weapons? The navy is very popular in San Diego, after all that was their only source of real revenue for years and years, but -- war is a crumby way to run the world, right?
Maybe we should take a good, long look at all our military. How much of the spending is money down a rat hole?

To Vista Granny wrote on Mar 2, 2008 8:59 AM:There are many countries capable of submarine warfare. China, Iran, Russia as well as a number of other countries. The real threat is from diesel submarines that are extremely quiet. Detecting submarines is important in protecting vital shipping lanes as well as military and economic targets worldwide. As for the Navy being popular in San Diego, you are right. There is a reason for it. A strong Navy allows us protect U.S. and global interests. We do need to take a long look at our military. There is always going to be waste in all of our government's operations. Just look at our social welfare programs. We are dumping trillions of dollars into welfare programs without ever having a return on investment. All we do with those is just teach the next generation to rely on the government and provide the bare minimum amount of contribution back to the society.

Mike wrote on Mar 2, 2008 9:30 AM:Who exactly is it that is going to attack us?

Reardon wrote on Mar 2, 2008 9:36 AM:Does the 9th Court also tie the training hands of the Chinese and Russian Navies as well? Both have large and sophisticated submarine fleets -- (see Jane's Fighting Ships) --and the price for not training for war is losing a war! Totalitarian states can afford to lose every war because the democratic states rebuild them, but democratic states can lose but once. If we lose once, all of the money spent in education, health care, infrastructure, and welfare will be useless. We already spend A LOT more on social services than we do on defense. We don’t even break single digit on defense spending, Vista Granny.

To Editor wrote on Mar 2, 2008 10:51 AM:It appears you have messed with this new format until you finally made it a pain to read. If one has nothing to do but point and click all day(city, home, city, home county, home , city) then I guess its fine. You don't print your paper copy that way so why do it here? The Peter principal prevails!

To Mike wrote on Mar 2, 2008 10:58 AM:No one, AS LONG AS WE KEEP A STRONG MILITARY. Duh, Many others if we don't.

American Mike wrote on Mar 2, 2008 11:08 AM:And some of you are allowed to actually vote? You’re kidding, right? Please take the time to research topics such as this before worrying about the goldfish. Eco's would have you believe that the planet would be a better place without (wo)man, and tug on your heart felt feelings about such issues to "lure" you in to support their causes. Green Peace, Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Earth First just to name a few. Be very leery of those organizations. A Country doesn't have to be big to cause grave danger to the United States. One 1960's vessel and a couple of conventional weapons could cause buildings in San Diego to topple just as easily as they did in New York. The real question is, when one of those countries rogue vessels does launch an offensive, and while our military is more than capable of handling most any situation, how will the next elected Commander in Chief handle that situation? Will they tell your family and friends when your gone that, “we must let bygones be bygones”, or “thank god, the whales are at least safe”, or will they order retaliation to prevent further conflicts and saving the children you left behind? A President must do more than stir cake batter or have the desire to collect reparations from all Americans with incomes over 75 thousand a year. I don't like the choices either, but unless everyone in the United States on Election Day votes "none of the above", then we must be careful about which of the lesser evils is elected next year.
It’s all on your vote.+

It's about Iran in the gulf, granny wrote on Mar 2, 2008 11:15 AM:Iran has diesel electric subs, and the Persian Gulf is very similar, in terms of bathymetry, and nautical traffic, to the Catalina basin. If we want to train our sailors to detect Iranian subs in the gulf, this is the best place to do it.

NRDC, of course, don't care, because they are opposed to the military completely. If they had their way, we'd be forced to have 10% of the population we now have, and live off the land. They're from the far extreme branch of the Enviro movement that wants "Ecoptopia".

As for District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper, an ultra-liberal Clinton appointee, she has demonstrated consistent lack of understanding of all manner of technology, including computers, in a case where she insisted that losing data in RAM that was never written to disk was deliberate destruction of logs (you do that every time you reboot).

Visa Resident wrote on Mar 2, 2008 6:09 PM:I don't think the Supreme Court decision will be reversed in this case because this is a case of declaring war on all underwater life. If we destroy ocean life, then we're ultimately destroying ourselves.

On Jan 17, 2008, Proud Officer posted on the NC Times that "It is possible to use detection methods other than this frequency of sonar in ways that do not cause horrific and fatal brain hemmorhaging in whales due to sudden surfacing. That our Navy would prefer not to do so when practicing is because of habit and not national need or security."

SURTASS LFA (Surveillance Towed Array Sensor System (SURTASS) Low Frequency Active (LFA)) primarily benefitted the Carlyle Group. The Carlyle Group is the same group that the Bin Ladens and the Bush family had significant investment in prior to 911. The Carlyle Group is connected to members of the current Bush Administration.

NRDC -- and most of the legal residents of the US -- would be quite happy to have zero population growth. All population growth in the US is currently coming from immigration. This results in more competition for jobs which drives down wages. The US came up with 7 million jobs less than population growth between Jan 2001 and Jan 2006 - according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Population growth also puts mounting stress on our infrastructure like schools, roads, airports, energy, water, air pollution, and even results in homes built out into our last undeveloped areas. Development of homes in wild fire country tends to endanger us all during fire season.

The US Census Bureau estimates that the US population will grow from today's 300 million to 400 million by 2043, and 420 million by midcentury. US citizens have done their best to limit their reproduction to sustainable levels. We have achieved zero population growth. Our government's rewards for these efforts is zip as they allow outsourcing of our jobs via NAFTA and allow mass immigration. "If you took every single job in the U.S. today and shipped it to China... it still would have a labor surplus." -- according to "Shift Happens" by Karl Fisch.

Skip wrote on Mar 2, 2008 8:46 PM:In less then two weeks I will leave for my seventh deployment. I hope no one shoots torpedos at us.

Happy supporter wrote on Mar 3, 2008 12:50 AM:I'm so glad that science, reason and a pinch of appreciation for the natural worl has prevailed. I've never been a prouder supporter of the NRDC - one of the recipients of my Bush tax cut dollars...-

dave from oceanside wrote on Mar 3, 2008 12:52 PM:Good luck Skip, looks like Happy supporter, and Visa Resident don't care about your position.
They would rather have you go into harms way hindered by their regulations protecting the whales.
By the way whales use low frequency sound waves to subdue their prey.
Maybe there should be a law against that.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos