Rainbow water district may halt sewer hookups

By: TOM PFINGSTEN - Staff Writer
Number sold has exceeded capacity in contract with Oceanside | Saturday, March 15, 2008 10:33 PM PDT

Leobardo Mora stands on his hilltop property where he wants to build a seven bedroom home for his family in Bonsall on Thursday. Mora has been told he cannot purchase a sewer connection from the Rainbow Municipal Water District and his property is too rocky to build a septic tank.
HAYNE PALMOUR IV Staff Photographer
Order a copy of this photo
Visit our Photo Gallery

FALLBROOK ---- Rainbow Municipal Water District officials said last week they were considering a moratorium on new sewer connections because they have sold more hookups than the district has the capacity to serve.

The proposed moratorium, if approved, would affect primarily individual landowners planning to build whose property won't support septic systems.

It is not expected to affect large projects within the district such as Passerelle's proposed housing development or the Palomar extension campus, both of which have sewer hookups on reserve.

But already the proposal is making it difficult for potential customers such as Leobardo Mora to build on their land.

Mora said last week he knows exactly where he wants to build his dream home: On a hilltop in Bonsall with 360-degree views and a cool coastal breeze blowing up the San Luis Rey River valley.

Of all the things that could have delayed his plans for an 8,000-square-foot estate, Mora has been denied a sewer connection, bringing his project to a halt.

"My plan is to build, but right now, I can't do anything because I don't have a sewer connection," he said Thursday, standing atop the picturesque site where he wants to build his mansion. "I don't want to sell."

With 10 acres, it should be a simple fix ---- there's ample room for a septic tank and leach lines ---- but Mora said that a soil engineer recently confirmed that the hillside is too rocky to install a septic system.

The site has everything else, including a water connection and approved building plans, but without the sewer connection, the project is on hold.

The district's board of directors is set to discuss the proposed moratorium, and possibly take action on it, at a meeting in early April. The item was originally on the agenda for a March 25 meeting, but had to be delayed because the discussion is expected to take several hours, said the district's general manager, Dave Seymour.

If approved, it will forbid the issuing of any more sewer connections until about 200 are turned back in to the district by developers who don't need them and don't want to pay the monthly fee to keep them on reserve.

Officials said the moratorium does not necessarily equate to a "no-growth" policy, because about 2,200 hookups have been reserved but not activated ---- meaning more than 2,000 homes could still be built with the sewer connections that exist.

But for property owners who waited too long to buy a hookup or who are just starting to build a home, the only solution is to wait until the district has more connections to sell ---- which might be years away.

By the numbers

At issue is how many sewer connections can be sold and used in the district, which does not have its own treatment plant but sends sewage from its customers to Oceanside to be treated.

According to its contract with Oceanside, the district can send 1,425,000 gallons of sewage per day to be treated ---- a number that equals 5,700 households generating an average of 250 gallons of sewage per day.

To date, the district has issued permits for about 5,800 households, although only 3,600 are currently in use.

The other 2,200 have been reserved by developers and private landowners with plans to build in the near future. Each unused connection costs about $42 per month to reserve, Seymour said.

By far the largest holder of sewer hookups is Passerelle, a housing developer with plans for hundreds of homes at the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Highway 76.

Seymour said Passerelle has reserved 850 sewer hookups.

The second-largest chunk of future sewer connections has been reserved by Palomar College, which is paying to hold 100 hookups for the extension campus it has planned on 83 acres near Passerelle's proposed neighborhood.

"The rest are kind of divvied up amongst smaller owners who have maybe a 10-acre lot they want to build on eventually," Seymour said.

Mora said he was originally told 62 hookups were available when he applied for one last year, and that when his application was denied he felt that he had been dealt with unfairly.

But Seymour said no one who approaches the district for a new sewer connection at this point is getting one.

No good solutions

The only two ways to increase sewer capacity would be for the district to buy permission to export more sewage to Oceanside or to build its own treatment plant, an idea that's expensive and unpopular with many ratepayers, Seymour said.

"First, politically, where are you going to site it?" he said. "Nobody wants a sewage treatment plant in their backyard. And all the unused land around here seems to be environmentally sensitive."

Then there's the issue of building a pipeline carrying the treated water to the Pacific Ocean.

"It would probably cost somewhere from $20 (million) to $50 million, just to build a small plant and the pipelines that would be necessary," he said.

On the other hand, the option of purchasing more capacity from Oceanside would not be much easier, he said.

To begin with, Oceanside would have to agree to the deal, and then the pipeline that carries sewage between the Rainbow district and the Oceanside treatment plant would have to be expanded.

"The system was only built for 1.5 million gallons per day, so we'd have to expand the pipelines all the way down to Oceanside, and that gets very expensive," he said.

Waiting game

About a half-dozen people have been trying to get sewer hookups in recent weeks, but have been turned away, Seymour said.

Now that the district is set to impose a moratorium, he said, he expects more pleas but his hands are tied.

"I think what will happen is now we'll get a lot more requests ---- people wanting to know what they have to do to reserve capacity, or how they can go about getting it," he said.

The short answer: Wait.

The only way more connections could be sold is if developers turn in unneeded hookups and the number falls below the 5,640 threshold the board is expected to establish when it approves the moratorium, Seymour said.

But for landowners like Mora, patience does not come easily when there's no clear idea of how long it will take for sewer connections to become available.

Taking in the view from where Mora envisions his front porch, it's understandable why he would be in a hurry to start building the house where he, his wife and their five children would live.

"Right now, I can't use the property ---- only for planting avocado trees," he said.

What will he do?

Maybe wait for a sewer connection, or "maybe sell. I'm not sure yet."

Contact staff writer Tom Pfingsten at (760) 740-3516 or tpfingsten@nctimes.com.

10 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

JSten wrote on Mar 16, 2008 8:09 AM:This is hardly news. Rainbow has had this cap on sewer connections for years, and the capacity issue is also well known. I'm sorry but for a person who is obviously smart and successful as Mr. Mora is, he should have seen this one coming.

Don wrote on Mar 16, 2008 8:17 AM:What happened to the plant that Pardee was going to build, free of cost to Rainbow. The lack of vision of the directors has placed the residients in a no win position. What a shame that petty politics can do so much damage to a small district. Who will pay for the expansion that must come just to handle the existing sewage? We need a leader with a vision for the future, not one living in the past.

Developers? wrote on Mar 16, 2008 10:43 AM:With people like this, building 8,000 sq-ft homes for a single family, why are Fallbrook residents so worried about developers? This selfish desire to build temples to ourselves will destroy this area faster than any developer could. I hope Rainbow Water continues acting like the local planning control board. A home like this has no place in our rural area!

AL wrote on Mar 16, 2008 11:13 AM:Stop the development of every picturesque hilltop. Enough.

Politics and Planning Ahead are like Oil and Water wrote on Mar 16, 2008 12:41 PM:SD COUNTY LAFCO quote "Discourage premature conversion of prime agricultural and open space lands to urban uses"

In ag areas 1 or several dream homes built by the different owner-builders on a mountain top area sounds fine.

In ag areas where developers want to put 1000 or more tract homes sounds horrible because the ag area will become an urban area. Which means problems: water availability, traffic, etc.

This would impact the quality of life of those now living in an ag area.

San Diego County LAFCO website QUOTE:

"Commission Goals:

Encourage orderly growth

Promote logical and efficient public services for cities and special districts

Streamline governmental structure

Discourage premature conversion of prime agricultural and open space lands to urban uses" END QUOTE

to AL wrote on Mar 16, 2008 12:48 PM:AL writes "Stop the development of every picturesque hilltop. Enough."

AL, it is a good idea because of the fantastic natural beauty.

However, you will need to buy the hilltop to stop growth.

Notice that the negative water situation does not stop the 'big' developers.
Let's leave individual landowners alone.

Bernard wrote on Mar 16, 2008 1:00 PM:Hope Mr. Leobardo Mora is allowed to blast and create his own septic area(s).

There are good blasters working in SD north county.

Septics really work nicely if installed by a worker with pride and knowledge.

While building his house, he will have to make sure only workers with pride and knowledge are involved.

The best workers will tell you 'they do not know' rather than pretend what they are doing is correct.

Curtis wrote on Mar 16, 2008 5:02 PM:Why is it that we can give this guy water but not a sewer hook-up. I thought we were in a water crisis?

burned wrote on Mar 17, 2008 11:12 AM:Why can't land owners build what they want and have a government that supports an individual’s lands right?

Dave wrote on Apr 2, 2008 3:07 PM:If the demand is sufficient, on site gray-water reclamation and solid waste handling will eventually become affordable to individuals. Our ancestors developed land by collecting their water upstream and dumping their waste downstream. Now that we prefer not to drink our neighbor's excrement, we could throw a little technology at a real solution.

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos