REGIONAL: Guejito owners reject Horn's preservation overtures
By: DARRYN BENNETT - Staff Writer
Supervisor plans Washington trip to lobby for cash
This story has been corrected since its original posting. | ∞
RANCHO GUEJITO -- The owners of a sprawling 23,000-acre ranch on the eastern outskirts of Escondido have rejected San Diego County Supervisor Bill Horn's latest proposal to buy and preserve the ranch amid speculation that it might soon be developed.
Hank Rupp, a Temecula-based attorney who represents the owners of the ranch, criticized Horn's plans to lobby federal leaders in April for funds to buy Rancho Guejito, the largest piece of privately owned, undeveloped land in the county and the last intact Mexican land grant in the state. Horn hopes to raise nearly $200 million in state, federal and county funds for the purchase.
"It's absolutely outrageous," said Rupp. "At 100 times that price (the ranch) is not for sale."
The response came after Horn announced last week that he plans to keep pressuring the owners to sell the property so that it can be preserved.
"I want to keep the ball rolling and keep it a front-burner issue when I go to Washington," Horn said in an interview Monday.
Horn said he has no plans to use the county's eminent domain powers to acquire the property if the owners are unwilling to sell it, but he said he is willing to go to great lengths to keep the land pristine and undeveloped.
The supervisor's comments may have intensified a struggle that has been brewing between the private owner of the ranch and a growing group of people determined to preserve it. And there is plenty of distrust between disputing parties involved.
Rupp has accused the county of exaggerating environmental concerns to wrest control of the ranch away from its owner. He maintains that officials, such as Horn, want to devalue the property so the county can purchase it at a depressed price in the future.
Furthermore, Rupp said, the family that owns Guejito has kept it nearly pristine for more than 30 years and has no intention of selling or developing the land in the "immediate future."
But Horn and others have said recent activity at the ranch has aroused suspicions that the owners are planning to build large housing tracts or commercial projects on the historic property.
In 2005, neighbors noticed helicopters flying over the property and began worrying that it was being surveyed for construction.
A few months later Rupp approached Escondido city officials about annexing the land, a move that would nearly double the size of Escondido and subject the property to less-stringent zoning regulations than if it remained in the unincorporated part of county.
Also stoking concerns from preservationists was the most recent addition to the ranch, a 100-acre parcel named Rockwood Ranch purchased by the Rodney Co. -- which directly oversees Guejito -- for $3.37 million last year. The property connects the ranch to Highway 78 and could serve as the site of a future road.
In addition, Guejito's owners have hired a prominent public relations firm and a development consultant. Such moves could mean the owners are preparing to move forward with developing the property, or are attempting to drive up the value of the property before putting it on the market.
Horn has suggested that a 2005 agreement involving the 82,000-acre Hearst Ranch could serve as a model for preserving Rancho Guejito. The deal set aside nearly 130 square miles of pristine rangeland along the Big Sur coastline in Northern California.
The property had been appraised at $230 million. But after more than six years of negotiations, the state paid the Hearst family $80 million in cash and $15 million in tax credits, while the family donated the remaining $135 million.
But Rupp said the future of the ranch isn't up to Horn or environmentalists.
"This is private property we're talking about," he said. "Anyone who owns private property in the county should be outraged at the county's attempt to steal (Guejito) from a private owner."
He said the Rodney Co. will "take stock of the ranch's resources" to determine its value.
"Whatever action we need to take to protect it, we will," he said.
Environmentalists often call Rancho Guejito the "conservation jewel of San Diego County." The rugged expanse stretches from the San Pasqual Valley north to the 4,221-foot peak of Pine Mountain near the La Jolla Indian Reservation. Meadows and mesas dot the landscape. Herds of deer and packs of coyotes roam the working cattle ranch.
Historians say American Indian archaeological sites, an adobe from the 1800s and a once-busy winery are landmarks on the untamed ranch that is a "time capsule" from the 1800s.
Benjamin Coates, a wealthy businessman, bought the property in 1974 for $10 million. Since his death in 2004, his daughter Theodate, a New York artist Rupp represents, has been managing the estate.
-- Contact staff writer Darryn Bennett at (760) 740-5420 or dmbennett@nctimes.com.
Correction: Hearst Ranch acreage misreported
This story originally misreported the size of Hearst Ranch. Hearst Ranch is 82,000 acres.
We apologize.
More Stories
Please wrote on Mar 25, 2008 6:34 AM:Buying Rockwood Ranch last year was significant: the Rodney Co was willing to plunk down $3 million for gateway property.
But what have the owners done recently to lead anyone to think that they're *really* going to develop?
This is just posturing by Horn.
Jim wrote on Mar 25, 2008 7:46 AM:Why must the government own so much raw land in the West? The worst case is when environmentalists buy this stuff and then turn it over for government care after imposing onerous restrictions. Most of us have no opportunity to enjoy the property but must pay for its care and upkeep. Look at Daley ranch in Escondido. I hope that this private group sticks to its guns.
Vista Granny wrote on Mar 25, 2008 7:59 AM:It would seem to me that the county can just say "no" to any building on the ranch. Don't the owners need permits of some kind? If the owner were destitute, or just needed the money badly, it mightbe different, but then, why not take the state or federal dollars? However, there seems to be no need to sell the property, so any plan to develop it is driven by greed alone, or perhaps a need to show power over others.
oh brother wrote on Mar 25, 2008 9:42 AM:this is private land.. if they want to put a road through it.. or build houses how great would that be! if not and they want to keep it how it is.. thats cool too! its theirs!
Wake up, Jim wrote on Mar 25, 2008 9:55 AM:Yeah, look at Daley Ranch. Have you actually been there? Almost all of it is available for hiking and exploration. It is OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. (Look at this map if you don't believe me: http://www.ci.escondido.ca.us/glance/uniquely/daley/map.pdf)
And the reason that the government needs to own so much raw land in the West is to prevent unchecked development (like the Rodney Co is obviously planning) that outstrips resources like WATER. Ever hear of urban sprawl? Setting aside the need to keep places like this pristine for wild flora and fauna, we simply do not NEED to double the size of Escondido at this time...having trouble finding a cheap house right now? I didn't think so. And I'm no fan of Horn but he's clearly on the right track here, and he's the reddest Republican in local politics. If he can look beyond the tired cries of "private property rights!" for the greater good of preserving historic open space, then you should too, Jim.
Privateland wrote on Mar 25, 2008 12:58 PM:Enough of the environmentalist. Because of them, we have higher water cost due to the extra dirt in Lake Hodges. Because of them, we have new construction being burned. Because of them, we are responsible for financing costs that they have put on us for their land purchases. Since when did private property become political fodder. Let Supervisor Horn and the environmental first agree to allow their front yards, their private property to be treated in the same callous manner as they do to others in the name of good, then perhaps they may gain some measure of credibility.
Umm.. wrote on Mar 25, 2008 2:10 PM:Quit horning in on everyones business.
Bernard wrote on Mar 25, 2008 5:09 PM:Horn wants more land for more housing developments. For more money for the County war chest (Supervisors gas, Supes retirement plans, etc.). He is not interested in our quality of life.
He changes the General Plan to meet developers needs. He, other Supes, and DPLU have no thought of the human factor when they decided to approve and use SIP for new developments. SIP takes the place of the correct number of ingress egress roads in case of emergencies (fire, quake, etc.) in new developments. This is not helping County residents.
He does not plan ahead - no infrastructure until after a development is finished. Probably Horn wants money from the developers for his next election campaign.
Horn has not stopped the developers from using agricultural land. He is making noise and pretending and lusting; bet he wants Rancho Guejito for himself.
Horn does not believe in govt by the people, for the people, of the people.
He does not practice the SD LAFCO Commission Goals:
*Encourage orderly growth.
*Promote logical and efficient public services for cities and special districts.
*Streamline governmental structure.
*Discourage premature conversion of prime agricultural and open space lands to urban uses.
Janet wrote on Mar 25, 2008 11:01 PM:Dirt in Lake Hodges causes higher water cost? Huh? It has never provided drinking water and has severe water problems because so many clowns have grass and have to load it up with fertilizer which washes into the lake. Despite urban legend, the dead trees have almost nothing to do with it. It's fertilizer, leaky septic systems, agriculture, runoff from roads. Anyway, the lake would be drained dry in no time if it were used to provide for local needs.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement



