SAN MARCOS: School board hears retirement plan
Bond measures proposed to cover shortages
By SHAYNA CHABNER - Staff Writer | ∞
SAN MARCOS ---- About $175 million in unfunded health benefits for retirees from the San Marcos Unified School District could be covered by selling, investing and collecting the interest on bonds, a financial consultant told trustees Wednesday.
Trustees at a special board meeting were told they could meet their liability for retiree health benefits for the next 75 years by selling about $48.9 million in 35-year bond measures.
Proceeds from the "other post-employment bonds" would be placed in a trust, and interest earnings from the bonds could be used to satisfy the district's annual "pay-as-you-go" obligations for retirees' health benefits.
Depending on the interest the district collects on the bonds and the management of the funds, the district also could use surplus funds to pay off current retiree benefits or the principal of the bond, Benjamin Dolinka, president of the Dolinka Group financial consulting firm, told the board.
"We are talking about saving some funds out of the general fund and maybe offsetting some of those cuts," Dolinka said.
The practice of selling bonds to cover future health retirement costs would be similar to the financial trusts many government agencies run to fund pensions, he said.
It is, however, a new idea for school districts and San Marcos would be among only a handful of districts to do so if the board agrees to follow through with the proposal.
Districts have only begun to look at their long-term health benefit liabilities, following a new federal accounting law that requires them to report and create a plan for paying the debt.
Superintendent Kevin Holt said he supports the plan, noting that with it, the district could begin saving immediately.
The district's projected retiree health benefits obligation is expected to climb from the $2.2 million it owes in the 2008-09 school year to as much as $5.8 million in 2022, financial reports show.
By selling bond measures, though, it could reduce that drain from the general fund by at least $1 million a year, officials said.
While no board action was taken during the information-only meeting, many board members expressed an interest in proceeding with the plan.
Trustee Mary Borevitz was the one person to express reservations, saying on several occasions that the proposal's savings and earnings seemed too good to be true.
Dolinka presented the board with two separate proposals: one where they earned an average of 7.75 percent and another where the reinvestment rate was 10 percent.
"I am nervous about being out in the front of this," Borevitz said. "I just can't believe it's going to be as great as it looks."
The proposals were presented to the board Wednesday night as a follow up to an August board meeting, at which the district hired the Dolinka Group to develop a funding program to meet the district's retiree benefits shortfall.
At that time, the district was projecting that the 75-year liability was as high as $360 million. That shortfall has since been reduced significantly through contract negotiations with the two unions.
Those reductions, reflected in the $175 million shortfall, included new rules stating that employees hired after July 1 are not eligible for retiree health benefits and the district has a maximum contribution cap of $11,265.
Contact staff writer Shayna Chabner at (760) 740-5416 or schabner@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Beth wrote on Apr 3, 2008 9:20 AM:I have a novel idea! Why doesn't the district require the employees to contribute towards their health care and dental benefits. Yikes, that is what the private sector has had to do to stay in business!
20-40 wrote on Apr 3, 2008 9:20 AM:I don't know how these types of retirement benefit plans exist. How can someone expect to put a small percentage of money into this for 20 years and then expect to get full benefits for the 30-40 years they live after they retire. Bonkers! What makes public employees so special?
Who will pay the bill ? wrote on Apr 4, 2008 6:21 AM:I guess if the School District is in the red and so underfunded, how are they going to sell bonds, and how are they going to sign that statement that they are fiscally sound ? Who will pay for this mismanagement - you guessed it - we will. Doesn't something as huge as this go before a vote of the people - since they are going to be the ones responsible. What will the State of California say about this process, if anything. Too many questions. It sounds like one of those sub-prime loans we have all heard so much about.
More charter schools wrote on Apr 4, 2008 6:28 AM:Why don't they just charge MORE money for schools, make each person pay for schooling (which is actually what they will be doing). It is time for MORE charter schools, because all of this money is for Retirement Funding (which has been seriously underfunded in past years, otherwise we wouldn't have such a huge deficit. Isn't that what the former superintendent was so concerned about, the one the district "eliminated" ?
JustMe wrote on Apr 4, 2008 12:57 PM:A lot of these retire benefit plans came into being when the cost of benefits was pretty inexpensive. It was a trade-off employers in both the private and public sector offered to employees in lieu of raises. The employer didn't have to lay out ready cash in lean times and could defer the cost by offering something they wouldn't have to pay for unitl some distant future date. What the employers didn't realize is that the Insurance industry decided they were entitled to make obscene profits and started charging much higher rates. Having worked in the beneifts field it was not suprising at times to see the annual premiums they charged rise by 150% in one year. Why punish the employee that bargained in good faith deferring salary increases for benefits later?
Community tax payer wrote on Apr 5, 2008 10:10 AM:Not only has the employee of the district been free health insurance premiums, but so is the employee's entire family!!! Whether they need it or not!!!! All paid for at the expense of the taxpayer. Cutting off these benefits now is a bit too late. I will never vote for another education bond measure again. EVER!!!!!
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (10602)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6597)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (5389)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (5312)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4975)
- HOUSING: Local median price up for third straight month (45)
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (44)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (29)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (29)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (27)
Advertisement
Videos
Advertisement





