REGION: Senator amends Coastal Commission bill
By DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
In response to heavy opposition from environmentalists, a San Diego state senator has amended a bill curbing the California Coastal Commission's power to appeal local decisions on shoreline hotels, condos and home remodelings.
The 12-member state commission oversees land-use decisions of coastal cities and counties under a mandate to make sure projects don't harm the ocean or restrict public access to the beach.
And if the commission staff doesn't like a particular decision, it can appeal that decision by persuading two commissioners to authorize a review. Then those two participate in a full commission vote on whether the local vote complies with state law.
That's a process some developers and North County officials see as unfair.
Responding those concerns, Sen. Denise Moreno Ducheny, D-San Diego, introduced a bill to strip the commission's ability to launch appeals.
Ducheny said earlier it didn't seem right for the people who decide appeals to initiate them, suggesting instead the commission rely on the public for any appeals.
Commission staffers, however, complained the change would result in many bad decisions going undetected and unchallenged because the public can't track everything. And environmental groups, who side with the commission, have vowed to kill the legislation.
In an attempt to salvage Senate Bill 1295, Ducheny has amended it. The bill maintains the two-commissioner appeal procedure but now would require the commission provide written comments to the entity whose decision is being appealed.
A persistent problem, said Ducheny, has been that cities and counties often don't know what is expected until after the fact. With the latest change, they would, said John Ferrera, Ducheny's chief of staff, in a telephone interview Friday.
"The amendment was raised to address concerns that have been raised by the environmental community," Ferrera said. "What we're trying to do is strike a balance between the need to protect the coastal environment and coastal access, and the need to improve a local planning process that can take years."
The commission staff remains opposed.
"It's not feasible to require the Coastal Commission or its staff to be involved in or to provide written comments on every coastal permit that is filed with a local government along the entire coast, in order to establish the right to appeal later on," said Peter Douglas, agency executive director. "We just don't have the staff to do that. It would be impossible."
Douglas said the agency reviews 1,500 to 2,000 local decisions handed down each year by city and county governments along California's coastline.
It is crucial, for the public's sake, that the agency maintain its ability to appeal developments that have escaped their notice, Douglas said. The environment and the public's rights often hang in the balance, he said.
"The coast is really the only place that a lot of people have left to go to for free recreation," Douglas said.
The bill is scheduled for a hearing before the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday.
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.
Advertisement
JuanGrande wrote on Apr 5, 2008 6:40 AM:The Coastal Commission is the ONLY reason the coast of California has not been turned into the disaster that Florida has become. If it works don't fix it.
Be fair wrote on Apr 5, 2008 8:34 AM:If there is a 12 member commission it seems it should be more then 2 to file an appeal. What if a vote was 10 to 2 on a project, quess what is going to happen, the 2 file an appeal. It should take more to file an appeal to be fair to the system.
Hobojoe wrote on Apr 5, 2008 11:00 AM:Florida is a disaster with the big buildings along the coast, and California is a breath of fresh air and preservation of our environment. Big business, graft and corruption could care less about our natural resources our beautiful coastal communities. I have many many relatives that come to California from Florida each year to get away from the high density building of Florida. Thank's Coastal Commission for saving our coastal cities, and making California a great place to live. Any one who wants to do away with the coastal commission certainly has greed and kick back money coming to them, and they do not care about Californias beautiful coast, only the money they can get!
Kerns Gal wrote on Apr 5, 2008 8:41 PM:Jerome, now what will you do with that letter? Hope you didn't mail it yet! You know we women change our minds about everything after we make fools out of our supporters!
Cillian wrote on Apr 7, 2008 4:16 PM:This bill is ill-conceived and is opposed by nearly every major coastal environmental group in California.
Only a tiny fraction of all permits are ever appealed to the Coastal Commission and an even tinier fraction of those permits are ever denied on appeal. Ducheny's bill is an attempted gift to wealthy developers, (as if they need more).
The Coastal Commission is a regulatory agency. We shouldn't be dismantling coastal regulation any more than we should be dismantling Wall Street regulation. The public deserves more regulation of these areas, not less.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, email addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
- REAL ESTATE: SoCal bloggers fight housing 'bailout' (3192)
- REGION: Just two police departments say they will offer a grace period on cell phone law (2652)
- ESCONDIDO: Police investigating Escondido teen's homicide (2621)
- ESCONDIDO: Teen slaying fits gang profile (2583)
- ESCONDIDO: Police: Freeway stop nets suspect in fatal shooting (2504)
Advertisement

