WILDOMAR: Trustees plan to discuss school closure Tuesday
Parents, teachers oppose shutting Jean Hayman
By RANI GUPTA - Staff Writer | ∞
Principal Nori Chandler reads to second-graders at Jean Hayman Elementary School on Friday. Lake Elsinore Unified School District administrators will meet Tuesday to discuss the possible closure of the Wildomar campus. (STEVE THORNTON / Staff photographer) WILDOMAR ---- School trustees are scheduled to vote Tuesday on whether to close Jean Hayman Elementary in the fall to bridge an expected budget gap.
Late Thursday, Lake Elsinore Unified School District trustees said they must consider temporarily closing the school because of the money it would save, regardless of the pleas of parents and school staff members to keep the school open.
"It's too large of a number not to take advantage of," board President Kim Cousins said.
Despite cutting almost $9 million from the current year's budget and the 2008-09 budget, the district still expects a $1.7 million gap next school year, said Darrin Watters, the district's assistant superintendent of business services. The school district has a budget of about $170 million this year.
Many of the remaining budget-cutting proposals ---- including salary freezes or work-year reductions ---- would require approval from the teachers union or the nonteaching union. After Superintendent Frank Passarella said he doubted either union would agree to the cuts, trustees said they saw no alternative but to move ahead on closing the Wildomar campus.
During Thursday's meeting, parents and teachers spoke out against shutting Hayman, saying it would destroy a close-knit culture where many families walk their children to school.
"It will be a travesty if you decide to close that school," teacher James Castagneto said.
However, trustees didn't discuss the budget until late that night. The public meeting started almost an hour late and included lengthy presentations, including high school students' performances of songs from the musical "Oklahoma!" By the time the budget presentation rolled around about 11 p.m., all but a handful of the Hayman supporters had left.
That angered Wibert Melton, who missed work to attend Thursday's meeting and was one of the few people still around for the Hayman talk.
"I think they've already made the decision and don't want the public to see," said Melton, who has two sons and a niece at the school. "I think it's wrong what they're doing. Just wrong."
Trustee Jon Gray said Friday that trustees haven't yet decided whether to close Hayman. But he said trustees keep returning to the idea because a school closure is "a big-ticket item" that would save more money than other measures on the table. Closing Hayman makes sense, he said, because the school could be renovated while it is not in use.
"I don't like the idea we might have to close Hayman," Gray said. "I don't like it at all. But I don't see any other way to solve the budget problem."
It's not clear how much the district would save by closing Hayman. Watters said it costs $815,000 to operate the school, not including the teachers who would follow the students to other campuses. The exact savings couldn't be determined, Watters said, until district trustees decide on issues such as how Hayman students would be reassigned.
The only option trustees took off the table Thursday was eliminating the district's busing program. However, trustees did vote to increase the price of a regular yearlong bus pass by $20 to $300 next school year. Students who qualify for reduced-price passes because of their family's income level would pay $200 for an annual pass, $60 more than they pay now.
District officials said Thursday they were concerned about the cost of providing substitutes for teachers and nonteaching employees, which has increased by almost $600,000 over the same time last year. Trustee Tom Thomas said employees are clearly abusing the use of sick days and personal days and urged district officials to investigate further.
Even if trustees decide to close Hayman, Cousins said the district won't balance its budget without talking to the unions about concessions. Cousins and Thomas didn't return calls for comment Friday afternoon.
Teachers union President Karl Stuck said agreeing to salary cuts would be premature "without further information as to what's going to actually happen with the state budget cuts."
Jeanette Collins, president of the local chapter of the California School Employees Association, said trustees are unfairly blaming the unions and treating them like "bad children."
Collins said her union, which represents nonteaching employees such as bus drivers and clerical staff, won't agree to reductions because union employees haven't yet received raises for the school year that started in August. The school board declared an impasse in negotiations in February.
"We understand the budget cuts and what the governor has done," Collins said, "but it seems like our district started pre-emptively slashing and seems to be getting further and further into debt every meeting they have."
Indeed, district officials now expect a larger shortfall than previously stated. District spokesman Jose Carvajal said expenses such as teacher salaries and benefits for retirees are higher than expected. At the same time, the district is expecting less money from the state because of declining enrollment, Carvajal said.
School officials expect state legislators to loosen restrictions on how districts can spend money now earmarked for specific expenses. But Passarella said legislators are unlikely to act before June 30, when the districts are required to adopt a balanced budget based on the information that's available at the time.
"Darrin (Watters) can't put a line item in that says, 'We hear it's looking good,'" Passarella said.
Temecula school officials cited the expected flexibility in spending earmarked money when they informally decided against closing an elementary school for the 2008-09 school year. Superintendent Carol Leighty has said announcing a school closure that wasn't needed would cause too much disruption and wouldn't save enough money to bridge the budget shortfall.
However, Rollin Edmunds, the Riverside County Office of Education's director of district fiscal and administrative services, said school districts should not assume legislators will loosen regulations when building their budgets.
"Unless there's some action taken, they can't really use those alternatives as far as we're concerned," Edmunds said.
The meeting on closing Hayman will start at 6 p.m. Tuesday at Ortega High School, 520 Chaney St.
Contact staff writer Rani Gupta at (951) 676-4315, Ext. 2625, or rgupta@californian.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Roberto1 wrote on Apr 18, 2008 7:24 PM:In my opinion, closing the school won't save money in the long run. It's time to get funds earmarked for boondoggles and other appropiations that cannot be spent elswhere and put a cash infusion into keeping the all schools open. Cut the administration first not last including the free medical for trustees.
Heres Your Sign wrote on Apr 19, 2008 7:58 AM:Cut the free medical? So that will save lets say $40,000 a year, heck lets just say $50,000 a year. Good start!. Now you only have another $2 to $3 million to go!
your a genious roberto wrote on Apr 19, 2008 2:56 PM:Trustees make a whole 450 bucks a month plus medical for all the hours of work and heartache from wonderful people like you! You would think the board members actually benefitted from all this the way people comment and the unions fight and complain. The board has been tasked with an awful responsibility, none of which any of the naysayers are willing to step up andcdo themselves. I for one support the board and wish them good luck through this turmoil.
fact check wrote on Apr 19, 2008 7:13 PM:the district has alreay cut administration ... something like administrative positions were cut, admin salaries were frozen, district office budgets were cut by $1 million and all administrators will be required to subsitute seven days over the next two years. administration can't be cut anymore. and since the unions, particularly the teachers union, aren't willing to offer anything up, the board is left with some difficult decisions.
LEUSD employee wrote on Apr 21, 2008 2:53 PM:To Fact Check: these 11 (not 15) posistions were NOT cut. These 11 people are retiring at the district and their posistion is not going to be filled for the following year. So yeah, NO ONE at the district is LOSING their job...just the teachers and staff. Such a shame to see POLITICS in Education!
Roberto1 wrote on Apr 21, 2008 5:01 PM:Cuts should start with the Trustees (all 5 of them) and work its way down....All the weasel words about the stipend only 450 a month, medical only 1000 a month, business trips only $$$$ a month etc. etc. being small money doesn't bode well.
Retire or Reduce? wrote on Apr 21, 2008 11:23 PM:To LEUSD Employee: 15 administrators in LEUSD either retired or were reduced by the Board of Education. Either way the district eliminated 15 administrative positions. What other school district in Riverside county cut administrators like LEUSD? Answer = NONE! Tell your school that a retiring secretary, teacher or custodian will not be replaced and see if the staff views these as cuts or merely retirements. Cuts are cuts regardless of the way they are imposed. Let's get real LEUSD employee. Fewer employees equates to personnel cuts! Do the math.
LEUSD Employee wrote on Apr 22, 2008 7:54 AM:To Retire or Reduce...if what you say is true, then we should be having this problem EVERY YEAR when someone retires. There are PLENTY of people that retire and the opening is not renewed the following year. It has nothing to do with "cuts"...simply no longer a need for that posistion or enrollment numbers are down or one person "staying" takes over both assignments. So, again...these 15 District positions were not "eliminated"... these people CHOSE to retire and the district saves money by not finding replacements. Why hire 5 to do the job when 1 can do it? If you do the math, you'll see LEUSD is saving money and not hurting ANY of the 15 that are retiring.
Lottery My A.. wrote on Apr 22, 2008 1:49 PM:Where is all the Lottery money? We need to make Arnie and the rest of the State officials accountable as well. What the .... lets make our future leaders (students) suffer because the Gov. spends more than it takes in. Stupid. Cut in other areas until we can balance things. Some road projects could have been put on hold and shift the money to the schools. They seem to shift the schools money to other areas so why not. I repeat some projects that really are not important ie. w.91 @ Serfas Club, Green River, just to name a couple. I'm sure we could all think of some!!!!
Roberto wrote on Apr 22, 2008 5:32 PM:To Lottery My A...,
Leave my gasoline tax dollars alone, they are already used for many other unfunded mandates. The stae is required by law to fully fund public education and they should be held accontable for it. They (the state)have reneged on building schools forcing self inflicted tax increases, cut funding after lottery windfalls and now just refuse to fund public education which IMHO is illegal.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (19)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (12)
- TEMECULA: Parade, fireworks draw thousands on nation's birthday (11)
- CARLSBAD: Golf benefit raises $20,000 for Conner's Cause (9)
- SAN PASQUAL VALLEY: Animal park offering extended hours, extra shows and activities (7)
Advertisement




