Valley Center avocado farmer Craig Bingham stands among the more than 200 trees that he recently stumped in order to meet a required 30 percent reduction in water use for agricultural customers. (HAYNE PALMOUR IV/Staff Photographer) AGRICULTURE: Farmers struggle with water price, cuts
'A tree is a wonderful thing to take care of'
By BRADLEY J. FIKES - Staff Writer | ∞
Valley Center avocado farmer Craig Bingham stands among the more than 200 trees that he recently stumped in order to meet a required 30 percent reduction in water use for agricultural customers. (HAYNE PALMOUR IV/Staff Photographer)
Nursery worker Florentino Tinoco hand waters potted plants -- one way nursery owners are saving water -- at the Pacific Paradise Nursery in Valley Center on Friday. (HAYNE PALMOUR IV/Staff Photographer) VALLEY CENTER ---- Before imported water irrigated North County farmlands, the desert here was anything but fertile.
Watch the video
Instead of groves of citrus and avocado trees and other crops, rocks and scrub vegetation dominated the landscape.
That desert could be returning. Faced with rising water costs and a water shortage, farmers in the breadbasket communities of Valley Center and Fallbrook are cutting back their operations -- and cutting down their trees.
Dead citrus trees and the white-painted stumps of avocado trees ---- avocados are one of the county's biggest cash crops ---- can be found in groves throughout Valley Center, Fallbrook, and other agricultural centers of North County.
"I think eventually there'll be no agriculture in Southern California," said Bob Polito, a Valley Center grower with Polito Family Farms. "There may be little pockets here and there, using local water, but for the most part agriculture in Southern California is going to disappear."
Polito said he's already removed about 1,000 citrus trees from among his roughly 6,000 citrus and avocado trees, cutting them down and turning them into mulch. Stumped avocado trees can regrow, but stumped citrus trees die.
Once trees come down, they're usually not going to be replaced, said Gary Arant, general manager of the Valley Center Municipal Water District. Because agriculture is increasingly marginal in Southern California, growers aren't going to make the investment and take the time to plant and water new trees and wait for them to become productive.
Citrus trees are the first to go because citrus isn't as profitable a crop as avocados, Arant said. But as water prices inexorably rise, growers say avocado trees will also come down in increasing numbers.
About 10 to 15 percent of the 24,000 acres of tree crops in Valley Center have been taken out of production since 2005, Arant said.
If agriculture does mostly vanish from San Diego County, it will involve substantial economic loss. San Diego County's agricultural output is estimated at $5 billion a year. The loss will also be aesthetic, said Eric Larson, executive director of the San Diego County Farm Bureau.
"We have pictures of Valley Center in the mid-50s when the water facility was formed," Larson said. "It was parched and brown. Agriculture in North County has made it green."
Pushed out
Growers say they have been able to cope with water prices until recently --- in large part owing to a program that provides discounted water from the Metropolitan Water District, the water wholesaler for Southern California.
In exchange for a 30 percent discount, growers agree to be first in line to get reductions of up to 30 percent or more if there's a severe enough water shortage. About 80 percent of the agricultural water in Valley Center is purchased under the program, Arant said.
Last year, for the first time in the program's two-decade history, that cutback clause was invoked. So growers with thirsty trees have "stumped" some trees to keep the others in production.
In Fallbrook, growers are stumping about a third of their avocado trees, said Bob Lucy, partner in the Del Rey Avocado Company Inc. Lucy said his company's growers have between 4,500 and 5,000 acres of avocado trees.
Some growers are removing the trees for good, Lucy said. Others are hoping that they'll be able to resuscitate their trees next year, if a 30 percent cut in their water supply is restored.
White-painted stumps are those avocado-tree growers are trying to preserve, Lucy said. These trees need a minimal amount of water while dormant but must be allowed to grow again in a year or two or they die.
Growers are frustrated, Lucy said, because they are not given the option of buying more water at full price. Some growers think they can survive even without discounted water, but aren't being given the chance.
The willingness of local governments to allow continued residential development in the face of a shortage also rankles, Lucy said.
Metropolitan isn't allowing growers to leave the discount program until the current water shortage is ended. The problem is, nobody can tell when that will be.
Environmental balance
The immediate cause of the cut is a court decision requiring a reduction in water exports from Northern California to Southern California, to protect an endangered fish, the Delta smelt. That, coupled with below-average precipitation in the state for the last few years, has already made water supplies precarious.
So with 30 percent less water, growers must cut production by 30 percent, said Keith Lewinger, general manager of the Fallbrook Public Utility District. In Fallbrook, the main crops are avocados, flowers and nursery-grown plants, Lewinger said.
Flower growers and nurseries have large overhead to cover, Lewinger said, "and now you chop off 30 percent of revenue."
He added: "I'm not sure how long they can go producing only 70 percent of their products. That's a business-by-business decision."
Lucy said growers also provide an environmental benefit, and trees should be considered in the equation along with endangered fish.
"Doesn't an avocado tree, as a living organism, have a right?" Lucy said. "It produces food, it gives off oxygen. A tree is a wonderful thing to take care of."
Contact staff writer Bradley J. Fikes at (760) 739-6641 or bfikes@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
anotherview wrote on May 2, 2008 11:33 PM:Statewide, farmers overuse and waste water. Farming activity now consumes about 85 percent of the available state water supply. Households use about 5 percent. The rest goes to government, industrial, and commercial. Simple math shows that forcing farmers statewide to lower their water use by only 5.88 percent would equal the amount of water households use. Further, about 30 percent of farm irrigation water goes to waste in runoff from the land. Via political pressure, however, farmers resist (1) improving their farm irrigation practices and (2) recycling farm water runoff. The Golden State has plenty of water available, but the distribution and use of this water does not happen rationally. Farmers grab most of the water, and then waste nearly a third of it. So any fair and sound solution to the water supply problem must require farmers statewide to stop using and wasting so much water. Then others will have enough water.
Jim wrote on May 3, 2008 7:30 AM:Growing a tropical crop in a arid environment using third world labor on the countries most expensive land was always an arrogant idea anyways. Perhaps solar farms using technology is the future. I love the groves but I also remember what Florida and LA used to look like. Land and water prices (and illegals demanding $15 an hour) have doomed agriculture.
fallbrookfellow wrote on May 3, 2008 8:55 AM:hey another view, if you would move out of state we would have more water also. Don't you like to eat? I hate to tell you but that is what farmers do, is raise food for you to eat. why dont you think before typing.. and just where do you get those numbers about farmers, and irrigation runoff? Please those false rumors have no merit in the real world. You should no what you are saying. let them move to china right esteban.
Confused wrote on May 3, 2008 9:08 AM:When we cut down trees do we not contribute to global warming? According to About.com: "In essence, trees, as kings of the plant world, have much more “woody biomass” to store CO2 than smaller plants, and as a result are considered nature’s most efficient “carbon sinks.” Some trees are better than others, but with a world wide food shortage this seems like another fool's errand by government bureaucrats. I think demanding an overhaul of water delivery and application technology would be a better choice. Keep the trees, especially crop bearing trees.
GFN wrote on May 3, 2008 9:56 AM:"The willingness of local governments to allow continued residential development in the face of a shortage also rankles, Lucy said." Couldn't have said it better myself.
Wake UP wrote on May 3, 2008 2:42 PM:There has been far too much overdevelopment. The delta smelt is a marker species like the canary in the land mind. If it is dying, then the Delta is not healthy. That provides water for 80% of California including homes, developments and agriculture. If the water becomes unusable then what folks? Where do you think your food will come from then? This is a national security issue and you're knocking food producers? Grow up, find the true facts, conserve and elect people on council/supervisory boards that will stop the rampant development. And quit yer complainin'.
This sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face. wrote on May 3, 2008 3:07 PM:If the farmers don't use water to grow their crops what then do you propose to use as food? Import food from other countries? I can see it now. Prices are already through the roof.
anotherview wrote on May 3, 2008 3:50 PM:The modest proposal that farmers reduce their water usage by only 5.88 percent looks all the more modest since the water delivery agencies have invoked the contract terms forcing some farmers to use 30 percent less water. This water-delivery reduction will bring change to farm irrigation practices. Cutting down trees shows an extreme example. Instead, notice the photograph with the news report where a farm hand waters plants by hand, a practice that consumes far less water than flood irrigation and its consequent uncaptured (and thus unrecyled) runoff. While hand watering will remain impractical for most crops, other irrigation practices like drip irrigation provide adequate, measured, controlled water to crops. Yes, farm acreage devoted to crops like rice needing flood irrigation may decline. But these high-water-demand crops would likely never have happened in the first place without the water subsidy supplying water at below market price to farmers. Ending these water subsidies would allow the economic axiom of supply and demand to dictate which crops farmers grew. Further, farmers who continue to apply flood irrigation to crops will likely introduce water runoff recycling to reduce overall water usage, in order to make such crops profitable. A rational water distribution forced onto farmers will induce more sensible farm irrigation behavior on farm operations, to the public good.
What are our priorities wrote on May 3, 2008 8:33 PM:To me it makes sense to keep agriculture near our population centers. Energy prices will probably keep going up, as will the cost of imported food. Perhaps some water is wasted in agriculture, but it seems that a great deal is also wasted on landscaping and golf courses. I would like to see native plants and other drought resistant plants used in local landscaping. Yes, avocado and fruit trees are not native to the area, but neither are the grasses and other plants used in most landscaping. For that matter, rampant development and a large unsustainable human population is also not natural to the area. So what do we do, get rid of our food producers and leave everything else the same?
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement



