FALLBROOK: $600,000 in school budget cuts approved
Shuttle service will be eliminated this fall
By TOM PFINGSTEN - Staff Writer | ∞
FALLBROOK ---- Educators approved $600,000 in budget cuts during a 15-minute meeting Monday night in Fallbrook, voting to eliminate a popular shuttle service that runs between campuses near downtown Fallbrook and to cut corners elsewhere.
In addition to the $600,000 in cuts approved Monday night, about $1.8 million in reserves will be used to cover an approximately $2.4 million shortfall.
The Fallbrook Union Elementary School District governing board meeting was remarkably short, with only a handful of items on the agenda and little discussion of the much-publicized elimination of shuttle services.
Finance Director Ray Proctor said the district's deficit is a result of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's proposal to cut about $4.4 billion from the state education budget for the new fiscal year.
An update is expected from the governor's office within two weeks, although the budget is not expected to be approved until sometime this summer. The school district is set to approve its budget at a board meeting on June 16.
The most significant cut approved by the school board Monday night was the elimnation of shuttle bus service between schools in Fallbrook beginning this fall, a move that is expected to save the district $260,000 a year.
According to district rules passed in 1995, children who live within 1 1/2 miles of their school are not eligible to ride the bus.
But under the shuttle system, if a family has children in separate schools, the parents may drop both children off at the nearest campus, where the second child could hop on a shuttle bus to his or her campus.
Scrapping the shuttle service wouldn't affect transportation for special education students or families who live farther than 1 1/2 miles from the nearest school, officials said.
About 75 people attended a meeting to discuss the shuttle elimination last month at Maie Ellis Elementary School, one of five campuses where shuttle service will be canceled.
Parents whose children ride the shuttles voiced concern that the cut would make it harder for students to get to school, but officials said they had little choice but to eliminate the program.
While the other cuts approved Monday night are subtle and involve shuffling personnel or trimming school budgets, Proctor said getting rid of the shuttle service was a hard decision, and called the whole package "very modest but painful."
"It wasn't something we wanted to do," he said. "It's been forced on us by the budget cuts at the state."
Jim Whitlock, assistant superintendent of human resources, said the Fallbrook elementary school district's financial situation is considerably better than in other districts, where entire school bus systems are being scrapped and hundreds of layoffs are in the works.
"This district has been financially prudent for decades, and it's times like these when that prudence pays off," Whitlock said. "We're better off than most school districts. At the same time, there are things we'd like to do ... that are on hold now, and that's never good."
As educators across North County speculate on whether California's education budget will rebound next year or continue into a second year of decline, Proctor said the Fallbrook elementary district is "planning for the worst."
"I'm hoping we'll have some positive news at some point, and that we'll have some growth," he said.
That growth is expected to come in the form of more than 100 new students who have enrolled in the district's newly expanded home study program, as well as more students resulting from hundreds of new homes near the district's San Onofre campus.
Even if the district's enrollment climbs during the 2008-09 school year ---- after several years of steep decline ---- next year's financial situation will rest on whether the state approves another round of budget cuts, Proctor said.
"We don't want to be in a position in '09-10 or having to make cuts like we're seeing in other districts," he said.
Contact staff writer Tom Pfingsten at (760) 740-3516 or tpfingsten@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Floyd wrote on May 6, 2008 5:36 AM:Last year, the state budgeted $45 billion for K-12 education. This year the budget is $48 billion. That's not a cut, that's an increase!
You except little kids wrote on May 6, 2008 6:56 AM:like me to walk 1 mile to school all alone? Do you know what happens to kids that are all alone on a road?
Bogie wrote on May 6, 2008 7:05 AM:Floyd, don't you just love those government entities that claim a cut when their cola's and other raises are chopped?
Larry wrote on May 6, 2008 7:10 AM:I hear ya, Floyd. Of the $2.4 million shortfall, 75% will be made up by a balance sheet entry. The $600K in "painful" cuts represents little more than 1% of the total district budget. We've been hearing all of these doomsday predictions for the past few months for a 1% budget cut?!!!!! I think educators need a serious reality check!
Fallbrook Mom wrote on May 6, 2008 7:49 AM:Just wait until we see the budget for next year. With all of the absences due to latch-key kids having no way to school, the district's funding will be reduced. They're cutting these busses to fix the immediate problem, but in the long run, I think it's going to cost them.
to larry wrote on May 6, 2008 8:20 AM:I am an educator and its not us taking the money...its the government, if it was up to us, we would encourage busses and more money to teach our kids. Do you understand what its like to teach children without funding...try it for a day!!!
Concerned parent wrote on May 6, 2008 8:21 AM:If parents agree i think we need to not send our kids for one day then that will really hurt the support this is for support if you agree email back and will go ahead and set a date
to educator wrote on May 6, 2008 9:23 AM:Educator, I don't know where you're going with this but you probably should have included some courses in basic economics and accounting as part of your college curriculum.
Reardon wrote on May 6, 2008 10:39 AM:We have an legal obligation to educate our childdren -- but there is no such taxpayer obligation to transport them, feed them, or recreate them. End all busing, lunchrooms and school-related sports, sell off the sports fields and buildings and there will be plenty of education money for the classroom.
hahaha wrote on May 6, 2008 11:02 AM:maybe economics isn't required for educators because they have no control over the budget...they are told how much money they are getting for the school year...teachers have nothing to do with it...get a clue
jaxd wrote on May 6, 2008 1:18 PM:The bussing is a joke and only affects a limited amount of students. Do yourself a favor and watch the 13 busses that arrive at La Paloma school each day with two of three students on board and then watch them pull out sometimes empty. This happens twice a day, so that is 52 bus trips; that is 40'busses getting about 6mpg at $4.45 a gallon; on a residential street while the are at least 65 cars with parents dropping off their kids. It is a terrible waste of money and a terrible imposition on the poor people that live on Mercedes Road.
Fallbrook Mom wrote on May 7, 2008 6:57 AM:Jaxd, the bus my daughter rides is always packed. I don't know what bus it is that pulls away empty. It's likely the special ed busses, which will not be affected by this cut. If you think one empty bus a day is a terrible imposition on the people that live on Mercedes, wait until the 600 kids that ride the busses are being transported by their parents. There will be a lot more traffic and pollution than a few busses would cause.
Fallbrook parent wrote on May 14, 2008 4:35 PM:Instead cutting money for busses, school programs, teachers and other essential programs that our kids desperately need, why couldn’t the district save some money and cut some of the school board members pay or those who make two or three times what a teacher makes? The district could have definitely saved some money there. Oh that’s right the board members made sure that their pay was not cut so they decided to cut busses, school programs and things that help our kids. That’s probably why you don’t hear them complaining about the cuts. Maybe it’s because they don’t have to worry about their wallets…? Makes you think how the system is not here to help the kids.
First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.
Today's Stories
Advertisement


