MILITARY: Attorney: Gen. Mattis to testify Monday in Haditha case

By TERI FIGUEROA - Staff Writer | Friday, May 30, 2008 8:12 PM PDT

CAMP PENDLETON ---- Military prosecutors will call on Marine Gen. James Mattis to testify Monday about whether a lower-ranking officer improperly influenced his decision to file criminal charges against a Marine tied to the killings of 24 Iraqi civilians in Haditha, a civilian defense attorney said Friday.

Mattis is in charge of U.S. Joint Forces Command, and also is the supreme allied commander in charge of military modernization for NATO.

It is rare for a four-star general to testify in a court-martial or pretrial proceedings.

Lt. Col. Sean Gibson, a Marine Corps spokesman for the Haditha trials, would not confirm whether Mattis would testify. He said the Marine Corps does not provide witness lists for court matters in advance of the hearing, nor do they discuss the travel plans of generals. Mattis is based in Norfolk, Va.

Defense attorney Brian Rooney, who represents Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, said Friday that government prosecutors are calling Mattis to rebut a military judge's finding that there was undue influence in Mattis' decision to bring charges against Chessani.

Chessani faces charges of dereliction of duty for failing to conduct a full-scale investigation into the Nov. 19, 2005, civilian deaths, which followed a roadside bombing that killed a Marine.

Chessani's attorneys have argued that Mattis' legal adviser, a colonel, improperly influenced the case. Mattis was a three-star general when he decided to bring the charges.

With the judge's pretrial finding, the burden falls on prosecutors to prove that no undue influence occurred.

And to that end, Rooney said, prosecutors plan to have Mattis testify.

The killings in Haditha led to the largest war-crimes case involving civilian deaths at the hands of U.S. forces since the start of the Iraq war.

Mattis eventually ordered criminal charges against eight Marines, four of them officers, including Chessani, who was the battalion commander in charge of the Camp Pendleton troops at the center of the Haditha incident.

Col. John Ewers was one of the investigators in the Haditha matter early on, and as such took Chessani's statement. That role makes him a potential witness in the case.

Later, as a legal adviser to Mattis, Ewers discussed with the general whether criminal cases should be brought against the Marines. Rooney said Friday that Ewers should not have been part of those discussions.

Before his promotion last fall, Mattis, who was based at Camp Pendleton, was the head of Marine Corps forces in the Middle East and commander of the I Marine Expeditionary Force ---- and, as such, had authority to bring prosecutions in the Haditha matter.

It is unusual for a four-star general to testify, said Gary Solis, a military law expert who teaches at Washington's Georgetown University and is a former Marine Corps attorney, prosecutor and judge.

But because Mattis was a decision-maker in the case, Solis said, it is appropriate for him to testify.

"And he is not the kind to shy away from doing so," Solis said.

As the cases have worked through the military court system, charges have been dropped against five of the eight accused men.

Of the remaining cases, court-martial is pending for Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, who led the troops on the ground that day. And the court-martial of Lt. Andrew Grayson, accused of obstruction of justice, is expected to wrap up next week.

Contact staff writer Teri Figueroa at (760) 740-5442 or tfigueroa@nctimes.com.

Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Massachusetts Democrat wrote on May 31, 2008 7:07 PM:Accusation-Investigation-Conviction-Trial.

Can't someone just do the right thing here?

AWcryinoutloud wrote on May 31, 2008 7:08 PM:This has got Undue Influence written all over it BUT does anyone believe the General is going to admit that he was influenced by his own legal advisor? Oh Puhleeze! For me the most important question is WHY the General allowed his legal advisor to investigate and take a statement from Chessani? No matter which way you look at it; whether or not the General admits Undue Influence, it is there looking right at everybody. This is the second legal advisor to the General considered in an Undue Influence complaint. Good grief! If the brass can't get the rules straight and abide by them, how can they have the gall to allow charges against Marines who follow the rules? They're not prosecuting war criminals, they're creating them through inuendo and their failure to stand by their own. Wow, what honor.

TIGMOTHER wrote on Jun 1, 2008 4:26 PM:Tigmother says that now with this little formality out of the way, justice will be served. Tigmother notes that AW4 is now AW, probably another of the groupie sisters. Tigmother notes that there is no reference to uhhhhh, the dreaded MURTHA and his supposed "undue command influence." Why? Because Congressman Murtha just happens to be in the LEGISLATIVE BRANCH of government, not the executive. Secondly, he merely commented upon a news article and in his capacity as a member of Congress. There is NO EVIDENCE that Murtha had some kind of secret meetings with USMC officers in the chain of command, urging prosecution of anybody. The Murtha issue is just another red herring thrown out there by those who are desperately defending the indefensible. Never mind, the USMC is doing the RIGHT THING in bringing these miscreants to justice, thereby showing the world that we are a Nation of law, and will not tolerate war crimes. A legal advisor exerts undue "command influence."? More grasping at straws.

TIGMOTHER wrote on Jun 1, 2008 6:04 PM:May Tigmother just add a hearty chuckle and a strong chortle to the prior post. These expressions of mirth being Tigmother's reaction to the pitiful post of the AW ---. Yes, here we have AW posing as an expert, the all-knowing guru of these cases. Tigmother will accept the decision of the USMC, in particular that of a 4-star USMC General over that of some ignorant blogger. Indeed. More chuckling.

AWcryinoutloud wrote on Jun 1, 2008 9:33 PM:To TIGmother: Nope! No groupie sisters, just plain missed hitting the 4. Thanks for your obvious admiration for me but you really need to get a life.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos