By: MARC FIGUEROA - Staff Writer
YES
We always hear about clubhouse chemistry and how it can make or break a team.
Barry Bonds is the poster child for bad chemistry, from the literal sense (see steroid scandal) to the one that has him confined to a Barcalounger in the locker room, isolated from his teammates and seemingly the rest of the world.
The reigning home run king has been mentioned in some circles as the Padres' answer in left field. Mostly it's been a mere mention, followed by a flurry of furious feedback ranting about how Bonds would be the worse thing that ever happened to the Padres. I disagree.
Bonds may be a bad guy with a big head, but at the end of the day, isn't baseball about winning? Bonds may not be juicing anymore, but the dude, as impersonal as he is, can still lay the lumber.
Last year, when he was seeing maybe one strike per plate appearance, he still managed to hit 28 homers in only 340 at-bats. Adrian Gonzalez, the Padres' home-run leader, needed 646 at-bats last season to scratch out 30 home runs. If Bonds ever gets pitched to again, he can easily match that using nothing more than a toothpick.
Let's face facts. In order for the Padres to win more games, they need more power in the lineup. Tony Clark will help, but he's not enough.
I hate this about the Padres. They always seem to do just enough to keep things interesting leading into September, but never enough to hang around in October. And we fall for this every time.
We fill up Petco Park, buy their gear, drink their seismically-priced beers and pay for two measly bites of soft serve ice cream just so my nephew can get a little plastic Padres helmet that he's going to lose anyway. And for what? Just to see the Padres get turned away at the postseason's pearly gates ---- again.
The Padres will never pull the trigger on Bonds. Not only are they not willing to pay for him, but they're not willing to take such a big public relations risk. And that's what irks me the most. The Padres are not a win-at-all-costs club. They're more concerned about image than victories. I guess that flies in laid-back San Diego, but it shouldn't.
I'm not saying that Bonds is the answer to the Padres' problems. But his bat certainly can't hurt.
To the Padres, Bonds' cons outweigh his pros. But in my book, the cons of the Padres outweigh their pros, too. So in this case, two wrongs would make a right.
Marc Figueroa can be reached at marcfig@aol.com.


