REGION: Area could lose one-third of federal highway money

Congress may come to rescue; legislation to plug gap passes House

By DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:11 PM PDT

Due in large part to drivers commuting less and more fuel-efficient vehicles, possibly one-third of the region's federal funding for highways and mass transit is at risk of disappearing. Here, a customer pumps gasoline at a Temecula Chevron station Wednesday. (Photo by David Carlson - staff photographer)

With tens of millions of transportation dollars at stake for San Diego and Riverside counties, Congress moved Wednesday to stave off a collapse of the federal Highway Trust Fund that pays for highway construction and maintenance, as well as mass transit operations.

The House voted 387-37 to pass legislation to plug a gap in the highway fund with an infusion of $8 billion from the federal government's main bank account, the general fund. The bill, House Resolution 6532, now goes to the Senate.

Rep. Brian Bilbray, R-Solana Beach, was one of those who cast his ballot for the bill, in a bipartisan vote that has a large enough margin to overcome a threatened veto from President Bush.

Bilbray said the shift was not only necessary to keep the highway fund solvent, but warranted.

"It looks like the trust fund has a claim on this," he said, noting that 10 years ago the same amount was taken out of the highway pot to plug a hole in the general fund and was never repaid. The general fund pays for national defense and the daily operations of most federal agencies, among other things.

"When you're flush with cash, it's easy to let your relatives borrow money from you," Bilbray said in a telephone interview Tuesday. "But when you're having a hard time paying the mortgage, you have to go back to them and say, 'I need the money now,' "

Over the long haul, however, Congress must find a better way to fund highways because the current formula isn't sustainable, Bilbray said. While stopping short of proposing a solution, he said it may be time to base the gasoline tax on a percentage of the price of a gallon of gas rather than on the fixed amount of 18.4 cents per gallon.

With the record-high gasoline prices, one might assume federal coffers are overflowing with cash. But actually, the reverse is occurring.

The take from the federal excise tax on fuel is plunging because the high gas prices are spurring commuters to trade in gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and trucks for compact cars and hybrids, to park their cars and board trains, and to work from home more often.

As a result, motorists are paying less in federal gas taxes.

"We're using less gas," Bilbray said. "But we forget that less money is going into the Highway Trust Fund when we're doing it. It's an unintended consequence of conservation."

Stakes are high

If the Senate fails to follow the House's lead or the president successfully carries out his veto threat, the amount of money available nationwide from the gas tax will plummet from $35.3 billion this year to $24.4 billion in the new federal fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, according to an analysis by the American Road & Transportation Builders Association, a Washington-based trade group.

What's at stake for California is $928 million in crucial federal funding and more than 32,000 jobs, the association estimates.

Given that San Diego County typically receives about 8 percent of the state total and Riverside County gets 5 percent (based on a formula that reflects population and miles of highways), local officials say the counties could lose about $74 million and $46 million, respectively. That's about one-third of what the region receives annually.

"It's kind of uncharted territory to have that much federal money to be in play like this," said John Standiford, a spokesman for the Riverside County Transportation Commission. "If you take a big chunk out, it can really screw up a lot of things down the road."

If the money is taken away, the planned French Valley interchange at Interstate 15 in Temecula and a 22-mile extension of a Metrolink commuter rail line from Riverside to Perris could be delayed, Standiford said.

He said it is unlikely that the funding lapse would slow anticipated work to widen Interstate 215 through Murrieta from four to six lanes, because that project received funding from the big $20 billion state transportation bond. But the loss of federal funding could jeopardize the timely completion of a segment to the north, between Scott Road and Highway 74.

In San Diego County, the funding lapse could affect projects such as the express lanes on Interstate 15, the car-pool extension on Interstate 5 and the widening of Highway 52, said Gary Gallegos, executive director of the San Diego Association of Governments, a regional transportation planning agency.

In the case of I-15, the loss wouldn't delay the 2012 projected completion date, he said. But he said it could mean the region wouldn't be reimbursed later for a portion of the $1.3 billion it is spending on the project.

Highway 76 said to be safe

Gallegos said the planned widening of Highway 76 from two to four lanes from Melrose Drive in Oceanside to I-15 also is in line for federal funding, but if that disappears, the road will proceed on schedule.

"It's one of the lock-box projects that we have said we are going to move even if we don't move anything else," he said. "If it is built with only (TransNet) sales tax money, it will be built."

But that could have repercussions later, triggering the delay of other projects, Gallegos said.

He said a funding lapse also could rock already strapped operational budgets for North County Transit District's Coaster and Sprinter trains, and Breeze buses.

He said San Diego County receives more than $200 million a year for transit and highways.

Despite the concerns, he said, "We remain optimistic that Congress will fix this."

The federal excise tax isn't the only tax people pay at the pump; they also pay a state excise tax that is fixed at 18 cents a gallon.

On top of that, commuters pay 7.75 cents in state and local sales taxes on every dollar they pull out of their wallets at the service station ---- or about 34 cents per gallon, at today's prices.

Collections of state excise taxes and state/local sales taxes are declining as well.

While the higher price of gasoline is multiplying sales tax receipts at the pump, transportation officials say, because of the flagging economy, the increase is more than being offset by declines in sales at malls and big-box stores. That's because service stations account for a small fraction of all sales tax collections ---- 8.5 percent in San Diego County, for example.

And, consequently, transportation funding sources such as San Diego County's TransNet and Riverside County's Measure A are losing, not gaining.

Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.

Next Previous

Advertisement

18 comment(s)[-]Go to Top

George wrote on Jul 23, 2008 7:06 PM:This would be a good time to reform the Federal Highway Trust Fund so that the money is used to construct and maintain highways instead of being redirected to fund transit buses, railroads, bicycle bridges, pedestrian overpasses, and land banking; all of which should be separately funded.

Old Timer wrote on Jul 23, 2008 9:49 PM:What ever happened to Sen. McCains proposal to cut the Fed gas tax and have a gas tax holiday??? Since early this year, it was known that the highway trust fund was going to come up short, yet McCain either didn't know this or he just used the gas tax holiday for politics - sounds good to get elected.
Just another Republican not telling the truth - and I thought McCain was a straight talker...

John wrote on Jul 23, 2008 10:35 PM:Nothing constructive is going to come from congress until the underbrush is cleared out. Dump Issa and Bilbray and vote Democratic.

Cal wrote on Jul 23, 2008 10:38 PM:George 7:06. With the price of gas over $4 per gal - all of the mass transit and bike bridges are looking mighty sensible. Why fund highways we can't afford to drive on?

Yes wrote on Jul 23, 2008 11:22 PM:Interstate funding was born, justified by our need to be able to move our military from one side of the country to the other. Anything more frivilous than that needn't be federally funded.

Yeah George wrote on Jul 24, 2008 12:14 AM:Ignoring mass transit got us into the mess we are in now, lets compound it and make it worse. Your fiddling and Rome is burning

Osider wrote on Jul 24, 2008 5:06 AM:I remember not too long ago when these funds were available and the Oceanside City Council voted not to even request for funding to improve the city streets. I guess it doesn't matter now because, we never would have received it anyway. The point is, they didn't even try.

The time has come wrote on Jul 24, 2008 5:32 AM:cut spending and cut unnecessary jobs. We, the People, are doing what we can to survive. (Driving less, etc) The Governmental entities have to get by on less. What I don't want to hear is another story of the DNC getting gasoline in Denver and NOT paying their "fair" share in State and Federal taxes. What an outrage. Crooks all!!!!

John wrote on Jul 24, 2008 6:17 AM:I have a better idea than George. This would be a good time to eliminate the federal gas tax and stop the federal government from dictating highway policies to the states. Collecting gas tax by the feds and redistributing it to the states only serves the federal buracuracy and wastes money. The politicians and bureaucrats see the high prices of gas and stumble over each other trying to figure a way to get a bigger peice of it for the government.

Jason wrote on Jul 24, 2008 6:37 AM:George, you hit the nail on the head brother. Either align it to what it was intended for, or call it what it is.

To John wrote on Jul 24, 2008 7:16 AM:yeah that's a great idea. Look what the Democrats did to California. Look at Congress rating since they took over. You must be one of those government please take care of me at all costs kind of people. Sorry I work to hard for my money and don't want a bunch of nanny's telling me how to spend it. I will vote independent but never Democrat.

Bribing us with our own money wrote on Jul 24, 2008 8:34 AM:I agree with John, the federal government has been bribing California with money collected from Californians. Now we're dependent on the federal government for highway handouts, and they're telling us how to spend it.

No wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:07 AM:I agree with "Yes." Japan and Cuba could invade any day now, so we should eliminate public transit and widen our highways from 16 lanes to 42 lanes. And when gas gets too expensive, our tanks and HumVees can use the highways to drive up into Mexico and Canada.

To Yes wrote on Jul 24, 2008 11:35 AM:You wrote:

> Interstate funding was born, justified by our need to be able to move our military from one side of the country to the other. Anything more frivilous than that needn't be federally funded.

I agree. Since the military doesn't need more than one lane in each direction to move military vehicles around, then the federal government should only fund 2 lanes in each direction. Anything more than that would, as you say, be frivolous. If the states want more lanes, they could take advantage of the right of way to add extra lanes, at their expense.

George wrote on Jul 24, 2008 12:55 PM:Every time you buy a $4.50 day pass from NCTD, the taxpayers kick in an extra $12.00 or so. How much money do the taxpayers kick in when you buy a gallon of gas? Actually, you are the taxpayer when you buy the gas, so you're the one funding the $12.00 transit deficit. More transit means higher taxes, something we can't afford in this economic climate.

Democrats Worse wrote on Jul 24, 2008 2:45 PM:With it looking my likely that Obama may win the general election, standby for massive tax increases. Your payroll taxes will only be the beginning. Everything from dividend taxes to inheritance taxes to social security taxes will go up. A new box on your payroll stub next to FICA to pay for the very beginnings of Socialized Medicine will be in evidence by the end of Obama's first, and hopefully, only term. It will continue to grow and bulge in price, as has social security, as time goes on.

Derek wrote on Jul 25, 2008 9:56 AM:George wrote: "Every time you buy a $4.50 day pass from NCTD, the taxpayers kick in an extra $12.00 or so."

Call it welfare for the poor. It's like when a disabled person pays $2.50 for paratransit and the public kicks in the remaining $25.

But it would be better if people paid proportional to distance traveled like in cities where mass transit is taken seriously.

Cindi wrote on Jul 27, 2008 5:27 PM:It would be helpful if mass transit was really designed to work. Many people would chose to use it. The way it works now, the taxpayers and the riders both lose. It costs an exhorbitant amount of money to get absolutely nowhere, even if you have been on the bus or train for two or three hours. From Ramona to Oceanside and back can barely be done in a days time with little time to do anything before turning around to come back. Trains and buses do not connect in any convenient manner, and each time they make a change or changes, it just gets worse. It makes you wonder whether the auto industry is running the bus system. ...

First name only. Comments including last names, contact addresses, e-mail addresses or phone numbers will be deleted. Attempts to misrepresent your identity or impersonate any person will not be approved. All comments are screened before they appear online, so please keep them brief. Comments reflect the views of those commenting and not necessarily those of the North County Times or its staff writers. Click here to view additional comment policies.

Submit Comment[-]

(optional)
   

Advertisement

Videos