REGION: Supervisors set to put parcel tax on ballot

Measure would raise $50 million for firefighting

By EDWARD SIFUENTES - Staff Writer | Tuesday, August 5, 2008 6:13 PM PDT

SAN DIEGO ---- A proposed tax to pay for a new regional fire agency could be headed to the ballot in November if the county Board of Supervisors approves the plan on Wednesday.

The proposal would set up the framework for firefighting in the region by creating a joint powers authority that would be funded by the $52-per-parcel tax.

At their meeting Tuesday, the supervisors unanimously approved changes to the language of the measure, including the makeup of the agency's governing board.

Attorneys for the county will make those changes to the document before the supervisors vote on it Wednesday.

"The countywide authority has been talked about for years, and I think it's time to move beyond discussion and actually implement it," said San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, who attended the supervisors' meeting on Tuesday and spoke in support of the plan.

Sanders and Supervisor Ron Roberts headed the Regional Fire Protection Committee, which developed the proposal.

If approved by two-thirds of the county's voters, the parcel tax is expected to generate about $50 million a year.

The revenues would be evenly divided between the communities that generate the money and the regional authority, which would use its share to buy equipment and buy or lease firefighting aircraft. But the plan does not specifically name what equipment would be purchased.

Supporters say those kinds of decisions would be left to the authority's governing board.

The supervisors appeared to have overcome their differences over the proposal, which generated a heated debate at their July 22 meeting.

At that meeting, Roberts said he wanted the governing board to include representatives of all 18 cities and the county. Supervisor Dianne Jacob proposed an 11-member board giving four seats to rural fire agencies.

On Tuesday, the supervisors approved a "hybrid" plan that would create a 10-member board, with one representative from the county, one from the city of San Diego, four from the other cities in the county and four from the fire districts.

Other changes to the plan included:

-- An annual increase to the parcel tax that would be tied to the cost of living index;

-- Adding five nonvoting members of the governing board who would represent American Indian tribes, the Navy, the Marines, the U.S. Forest Service and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection;

-- A requirement that the four cities on the governing board should come from four different areas: North County coastal, North County inland, East County and South County.

Several people spoke against the plan during the meeting, including members of a group led by former San Diego Fire Chief Jeff Bowman of Escondido.

The group, called the San Diego Regional Fire Safety Forum, says the $50 million that would be generated by the parcel tax is not enough and the plan lacks a guarantee that more professional firefighters would be hired.

"It does not seem to have any measurable goals," said Rick Fisher, president of the Carlsbad Firefighters Association and a member of the forum. "It does not tell us how many new firefighters we will put on the ground, how many new fire engines we will put in the county, how many fire stations will be built or if we will improve our response times."

Other fire officials, including representatives of the San Diego County Fire Chiefs Association and the San Diego Fire Districts Association, spoke in support of the proposal.

"There are going to be detractors that will state that this isn't enough, and I agree," said Augie Ghio, president of the fire chiefs association. "It isn't enough money to do what we know needs to be done in this region, but it is another step in the right direction."

Officials say the parcel tax is needed to boost the region's fire services. The county recently approved a plan to merge a dozen rural fire agencies and increase its spending on fire resources from about $8 million a year to $15.5 million.

The proposed tax would be in addition to that money.

In May, the supervisors also unanimously approved a plan to spend $3 million to lease three firefighting airplanes.

Under that plan, county officials leased two water-dropping planes, Canadian-built CL-415 Bombardier Superscoopers, from the government of Quebec for three months beginning in September.

A supervising aircraft, an Aero Commander 690, was be leased from Mountain Aviation, a private firm in Colorado. That airplane recently began flying in the county, Ghio said.

Contact staff writer Edward Sifuentes at (760) 740-3511 or esifuentes@nctimes.com.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

NOTax wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:13 PM:That will be a No Vote

No Fire wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:27 PM:I agree with NOTax. We should just let fires burn out of control and pick up the pieces afterward.

Carter wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:30 PM:Those guys seem to be in a hurry to spend our money as they choose. Well, come election day we the voters will do as we choose.
Those that have rental property will get their $52.00 back and more - from their renters.
Those guys seem to be in a hurry to levy taxes. First, assure that the laws are in place that will mandate the following - the public safety is at stake here:
I suggest aerial photos be taken of those areas most likely to burn, and then do drive by, visual inspections and taking photos of parcels that are not be in compliance, starting with the parcels owned by members of the Board of Supervisors, fire chiefs, city officials, etc. The list of those that are not in compliance should be posted in the newspapers, with their names remaining on the list until their property comes into compliance.
We the people have a right to know that our workers/employees are complying with the law - the public safety is at stake here.
levy heavy fines every month for those that are not in compliance. Make it worth their while to comply with the law.
Do the same with utility companies that are not in compliance and do it in a manner that the CFO and CEO will find fixing their infrastructure problems and cutting back the right-of-way the more lucrative action. They have already showed that is what will make up their minds for them. Give them a monetary incentive and they will do the right thing every time.
It seems that the people we elected, or were selected by the people we elected, think that throwing more money after more money on the fires will put them out. I am making a list of names as they appear in the news,of people that should start up-dating their resumes.

Given..... wrote on Aug 6, 2008 12:48 AM:the same conditions that we have had in the past October fire seasons, winds, fuel loads, temps and humidity, additional rescources in man-power and apparatus may help to save a few more homes, but until the County starts allowing only certain types of buildings to be allowed to built in these fire prone areas, we will see repeats of the losses that have been suffered in the past. No amount of money generated through these parcel taxes will stop these wildland conflagrations once they get rolling in the dry, east county chaparel.

They Wish wrote on Aug 6, 2008 3:53 AM:They wish they could conjure up another half a billion or so of our hard earned money. Not no, but HELL NO.

blm wrote on Aug 6, 2008 6:40 AM:Wildland Fires are a symptom of poor management practices. The root cause: We cannot continuously suppress fire in brush and forested lands without a coordinated effort to periodically thin the accumulated dead material which grows into larger and large piles of kindling. I'd rather spend my tax money on a program that addresses this root cause and seeks to prevent the conditions that lead to catastrophic, unstoppable files fueled by decades of neglect. There are environmentally and aesthetically sound ways to manage the brush and tree density so the inevitable fires that start by accident, arson or lightning don't just leave moonscape behind them.

Floyd wrote on Aug 6, 2008 9:04 AM:Allowing the fires to burn out of control and picking up the pieces afterward is CalFire's current policy. No change there.

Randy wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:26 AM:The supervisors should donate their $5 million slush funds first.

ThinkFreedom wrote on Aug 6, 2008 11:14 AM:Our current tax dollars should FIRST be dedicated to public safety services - not last. Riverside County has its own countywide fire dept and the citizens in the unincorporated areas do NOT have to pay an extra tax for this basic government service!

Wheres the money wrote on Aug 6, 2008 1:00 PM:Didn't we pass a police/fire proposition, Proposition 172, maybe, that sent 1/4 cent of the 7.75 cents pf sa;es tax that are xcllected on every dollar of purchases ? Didn't that money get sent directly to the County of San Diego to parcel out to individual districts ? Maybe I am wrong. but I think the county is collecting millions of dollars annyally for that purpose - and not spending it.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos