REGION: State bills SDG&E $21 million

CalFire trying to recover costs of fighting 2007 Witch Creek, Rice fires

By TERI FIGUEROA - Staff Writer | Friday, August 29, 2008 4:41 PM PDT

It cost California more than $21 million to fight last fall's Witch Creek and Rice wildfires, and the state wants San Diego Gas & Electric Co. to foot the bill.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection sent a letter to the utility last month, asking that it pay more than $13.4 million to cover the cost of fighting the massive Witch Creek fire, which the state's fire agency says was started by downed SDG&E power lines.

CalFire also wants the power company to pay it the nearly $8 million it cost to fight the Rice fire, which swept through Rainbow and Fallbrook.

The letters are dated July 18, about a week after state fire officials released a report concluding that SDG&E's power lines sparked the blazes, which started during Santa Ana conditions last October.

On Tuesday, CalFire provided the North County Times with copies of the letters it sent to SDG&E demanding payment.

The bills are not a surprise. The fire agency said it routinely seeks reimbursement from entities it blames for starting a blaze.

The largest reimbursement in CalFire's history was about $10 million from another utility.

SDG&E spokeswoman Stephanie Donovan said Tuesday that SDG&E has paid firefighting costs in very limited amounts following different, smaller fires.

"We occasionally receive these kinds of letters, but only occasionally," Donovan said, "because not many fires are started by SDG&E."

Downed power lines reportedly account for a 2 percent of vegetation fires started in 2006, according to CalFire's Web site.

Donovan said the primary culprit for the wildfires was "hurricane-force" winds, and not the utility's power lines.

"In our opinion, the fires were caused by the weather conditions last fall," Donovan said. "These kind of extreme conditions created a huge hazard for everybody, including the electrical system."

In the report released last month, forestry and fire protection officials concluded winds reaching more than 80 mph slapped overhead wires against each other, sending showers of sparks into dry grass below on a Ramona-area ranch to start the 198,000-acre Witch Creek fire.

And the 9,472-acre Rice fire, the agency concluded, was also sparked by SDG&E's power lines. Before firefighters knocked down the blaze, it destroyed 206 homes, 40 outbuildings and two commercial properties.

If SDG&E balks at the bills, the state has the option of filing a civil suit.

If it does, it would join the 29 other suits thus far filed against the utility, seeking money for damages wrought by the wildfires.

Asked if the CalFire bills and the court cases will mean higher rates for customers, Donovan said it is "premature to speculate on outcome, including (an increase) in rates."

She also said the insurance carried by the utility "will likely be adequate to cover any damages should this go to trial."

The court cases are still very much in their infancy, and the judge is still working through logistics on how to proceed.

On top of the bills, the state agency has the option of asking for misdemeanor criminal charges against SDG&E. Last month, a CalFire spokeswoman said the agency might do so.

But on Tuesday, Tom Hoffman, CalFire's chief of law enforcement, said that in large cases like these fires, it's uncommon to chase criminal charges.

That, he said, is because the bottom line is fire prevention, and recouping costs has been more effective than filing minor criminal charges.

"We're in the business of preventing fires," Hoffman said, "and if people know they can be held financially liable for their negligence, it has been my experience that it does modify behaviors."

And though the bills sent to SDG&E didn't come as a surprise to Terry Singleton, one of the attorneys representing dozens of property owners hit by the massive wildfires, he said Tuesday that the $21 million amount the state is seeking was unexpected.

"I thought it would have been higher," attorney Singleton said. "That seems to me to be a conservative figure."

The largest settlement CalFire has ever landed in recovering the cost of fighting a fire came a few years ago, when Northern California utility company Pacific Gas & Electric agreed to pay about $10 million for costs to suppress the 2001 Poe fire.

That blaze, also sparked by downed power lines, burned for six days and destroyed 47 homes and 120 outbuildings in rural Butte County, north of Sacramento.

Contact staff writer Teri Figueroa at (760) 740-5442 or tfigueroa@nctimes.com.

Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Jane wrote on Aug 5, 2008 8:37 PM:Ultimately it is the consumer who will foot the bill, regardless of insurance. Instead of suing, why not insist that SDG&E put in underground power lines?? Time to get with the program....SD is riddled with these unsightly and dangerous above ground lines.

Sandra wrote on Aug 5, 2008 9:30 PM:Perhaps SDG&E should countersue because CalFire did not aggressively combat the fire with all availabale resources in an effort to pad their claim. I remember fire-fighting helicopters sitting on the ground because there were no CalFire-certificated spotters. And who was supposed to provide the spotters? Why, CalFire, of course. There will be a lot of laughter in the courtroom when these facts are revealed.

What are a thousand lawyers chained up at the bottom of the ocean a good start wrote on Aug 5, 2008 11:48 PM:It sure sounds like the state if money hungry at barking at the wrong tree. The state needs to send God the bill and that is the bottom line. The whole serious of allegations are so pathetic, let me ask if there were no "hurricane-force" winds of over 80 mph would we have had a these fires?

SDG&E should fight the suits and then seek reimbursement for attorney fees from the state, the homeowners and their shark attorneys.

but NOT FROM ME!!!!!

Hello Sunrise Power Link wrote on Aug 5, 2008 11:49 PM:Get ready for a lot more of this if the Sunrise power link goes in as the Sempra Corporation wants to do. Get solar on your house today for a safer tomorrow.

SDGE bills wrote on Aug 6, 2008 7:40 AM:consumers 21 million dollars. The state has different methods in collecting more income from its citizens.

SDGEE will never pay wrote on Aug 6, 2008 8:53 AM:You know that they will keep this tied up in court so long that it will be reduced. it is another reason there should never be allowed to have giant corporations like exxon mobil. They create hazardous situations and feel they are not responsible for hurting the land. Shame on you...

Funny wrote on Aug 6, 2008 9:11 AM:Funny, the money that may get ultimately paid does not grow on trees, so those that want to punish SDG&E are really punishing the folks that pay the gas and electric bills. It's not like a business that has competitors you could switch too when they pass the cost along. It's more like one government agency suing another. What's the point? The other funny thing was the comment about insurance paying for it. Yes, and where does the insurance company get it's money? From the people it insures, so again, we pay for it, either through higher premiums, or through increased costs by SDG&E when they pay their premium. So really, the folks with any net gain in all of this is (drum roll please....) the lawyers! Funny huh? Are you laughing yet?

Randy wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:28 AM:SDG&E should pay $6.75 an hour for services rendered by the State of California.

To Sandra wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:56 AM:Are you kidding me with that comment? The helicopters were grounded because the spotters couldn't do their job because of the wind. Also, let's not forget that most of California was on fire at the time. The resources are limited because the State refuses to look at the firefighting ways and complete lack of funding, If you remember correctly the state said that we were prepared for another firestorm and that all resources were available. All that was, was a bunch of political lies......the outcome devestation.

The consumers are wrote on Aug 6, 2008 12:21 PM:the ONLY ones who will pay, regardless of whose fault it is.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos