REGION: Surging condo prices raise questions

Facing default, developer pulls off string of high-priced sales

By ZACH FOX - Staff Writer | Saturday, August 16, 2008 11:52 PM PDT

Brookhaven Condominiums has been selling way over price, compared to other reasonably priced condo conversions in Escondido. (Photo by Don Boomer - Staff Photographer)

In the middle of a historic recession for North County's housing market, one south Escondido condominium complex experienced an extraordinary burst of sales.

Twelve small units in Brookhaven Condominiums, a development of two converted apartment buildings, have sold since December for $360,000 or more ---- roughly double the prices of similar condos in the neighborhood. Indeed, the dozen Brookhaven units had surged by 31 percent in value since 2006, even as the median price of condos in the area plummeted 54 percent.

Neither Brookhaven's developers nor their bankers would explain this remarkable performance, despite repeated requests from the North County Times.

But two of Brookhaven's buyers say they face foreclosure and tarnished credit records. And details of the condo sales obtained via county records tell a story of what appear to be high-risk loans and market-defying sales resembling excesses seen during the regional and national housing boom.

For most homeowners, that boom ended abruptly in the summer of 2005, eventually destroying trillions of dollars in equity across the nation, tipping thousands of families into foreclosure and triggering a worldwide banking crisis that lingers today.

Soon after the Brookhaven project's inception, its developers seemed poised to be similarly buried by the housing crash.

A development team composed of two couples ---- Steven and Nancy Renfeldt from Escondido and John and Lisa Meadors from Highland, Utah ---- purchased the complex in April 2005 for $3 million, according to county records.

The developers secured a $3.4 million construction loan, which was later increased to $3.5 million.

Rehabbing in a housing crash

The team, which called themselves Meadors of Renfeldt Development, suffered from poor timing: Seven months after their purchase, the housing market began a landmark decline that has left values 29 percent lower on average in San Diego County amid the worst sales downturn in at least 20 years.

And converting apartments to condos took time. In July 2006, the two couples completed the renovation, which featured new kitchens outfitted with high-end granite slab countertops.

By November 2006, three of the 20 condos at the complex had sold for between $275,000 and $334,000.

Four months later, in March 2007, one more would sell; a 948-square-foot unit for $256,000.

Then the sales dried up, according to county records.

Within months, the development team was struggling to repay its construction loan, evidenced by a notice of default filed in December 2007, according to county records.

Facing thousands of dollars in losses and few buyers, the developers apparently got creative in November 2007.

An unusual sale

After eight months of no sales activity at the complex, which is near the corner of 15th Avenue and Escondido Boulevard, a 1,128-square-foot condo sold for $385,000. However, according to the county assessor's office, the sale never happened.

Two weeks after the November sale, a second deed transferred the condo back to the developers.

The buyer of record, Julie Cottam of Escondido, said she never provided any money for the condo and did not know she briefly owned a unit in the Brookhaven complex. She said she signed some documents as a favor to a friend, Nancy Renfeldt.

"I don't know if it was a deed. I just trusted her; I was a friend," Cottam said, adding she never planned to buy the condo.

Renfeldt didn't return several phone calls from the North County Times seeking an explanation of the transactions and other questions. John Meadors, reached by phone, characterized himself as only "an investor" and referred all calls regarding the condo sales to Nancy Renfeldt, whom he said had stopped taking his calls.

Rising prices

But the transaction may have been important in setting a benchmark that raised the apparent value of the unsold units in the Brookhaven complex.

However fleeting, Cottam's ownership turned up as a sale on the local real estate industry's most important search tool, a database operated by Sandicor, a San Diego real estate firm.

Sandicor's system is used by real estate agents daily to list units for sale, see what is available for buyers and determine the market value for everything from a Gaslamp District loft to a sprawling ranch in Bonsall.

Soon after Cottam's transaction appeared on the database, business improved for the developers.

A month later, in December 2007, a 948-square-foot condo sold for $360,000. The price was up dramatically from the $256,000 paid for an identical unit purchased the previous March, the most recent sale.

The buyer who broke Brookhaven's long sales drought was Maria Roberts of Tijuana.

Nothing down

Roberts' husband, James, said the couple, who make a living as commodities investors, had no knowledge of the Escondido real estate market.

"They said several (condos) had sold for that price, so it had to be a good price," he said.

What the couple didn't know, he said, was that the condo was the first sale at that price, according to county records.

The deal was financed with a loan from Washington Mutual that required no down payment.

The mortgage was extraordinary because it came four months after the onset of a widely reported global credit crunch. As foreclosures spiked in 2007, banks shut down risky loan programs, including those that required low or zero down payments.

Further, Maria Roberts' no-down-payment loan was issued on a condo that sold at a much higher price than a comparable unit nearby. The day before the Roberts sale closed escrow, a larger condo, also recently renovated with upgrades, sold for $310,000, or $215 per square foot.

The Brookhaven condo Roberts bought was sold to her for $380 per square foot.

Washington Mutual declined to comment, citing privacy policies.

Investors take the pitch

James Roberts said the sales pitch on the investment worked like this: The couple would hold the property in his wife's name for a year while the developers paid the mortgage by finding renters. After a year, the developers would buy back the property and cover any depreciation.

For their trouble, the Robertses would receive $50,000, he said. They have received only $20,000, he said.

One month later, another sale to Maria Roberts closed with a 5 percent down payment, according to county records. But that wasn't part of the deal, said James Roberts.

Further, Roberts said they never put any money into escrow for the down payment.

Now, the Robertses face foreclosure on both condos as the mortgages went unpaid.

"The banks are screaming at us for the mortgage payments. And we're screaming back at the bank because it shows she purchased two when she only purchased one," James Roberts said.

Maria Roberts' December purchase and the fleeting Cottam deal in November preceded a remarkable run of sales at Brookhaven.

Prospects improve

By June, Renfeldt and her partners had sold 12 condominiums in the complex ---- an impressive record, considering new condo sales in all of Escondido stood at "negative-five" through the first two quarters, according to data from MarketPointe Realty Advisors, a San Diego research firm.

MarketPointe counts canceled contracts as negative sales, meaning Escondido had five more cancellations than new sales from January through June.

The Brookhaven condos sold for an average of $361,000 each, or $381 per square foot, according to county records. Discounting Brookhaven, all other condominiums in the neighborhood have averaged a price of $144 per square foot this year, according to Sandicor records.

"They're so blatantly overpriced," said Troy Sauvageau, an Escondido real estate agent. "That's what blows me away. Maybe they're sitting on an oil field, I don't know. All day long in Escondido you can find stuff" in the low $200,000 range.

Bucking the trend

Further mystifying housing analysts is the 31 percent appreciation in the sales prices of Brookhaven's condos from December 2006.

Meanwhile, the median price for a condo in that ZIP code dropped by 54 percent.

"I'm extremely hesitant to believe that," said Robert Martinez, research director for MarketPointe, about the appreciation of the Brookhaven condos.

As those condos sold, Elba Coronado was trying to sell her Brookhaven unit, which she bought in December 2006 for $275,000. Her real estate agent, Sauvageau, listed it at a range of $320,000 to $335,000, according to Sandicor.

Sauvageau said he received little interest, while Renfeldt and her partners were able to sell others for $360,000 or more.

Also remarkable, amid a worsening credit crunch, all the 2008 sales in Brookhaven carried mortgages with down payments of 12 percent or less. The average price on Brookhaven condos has been 164 percent higher than the average price of all other condos in the area.

"You would think that after the huge market meltdown, that banks and lenders would be paying a whole lot more attention to make sure they're appropriately pricing the collateral," said Paul Leonard, director of the California office of the Center for Responsible Lending in Sacramento.

With no knowledge of the Escondido condo market, Leonard said he could not comment specifically on the Brookhaven complex, but "to the extent that I hear about transactions like this one, it's clear that there are still some problems that need to be fixed."

Contact staff writer Zach Fox at (760) 740-5412 or zfox@nctimes.com. Read his blog, "On the Realside," at www.nctimes.com/blogs/minding_your_business.

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

simply wrote on Aug 16, 2008 7:50 PM:unreal that anyone would want to live/BUY one of these apartments. Looks like an apartment I rented back in the 70's !!

Ask wrote on Aug 16, 2008 8:14 PM:Something is not on the up and up with this.

I'm sure the rest of us will be stuck with this bill.

Hope the people at wamu lose their job over the loans.

Bill wrote on Aug 17, 2008 5:56 AM:crooks

Paul wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:27 AM:Why doesn't one of the victims bring a lawsuit against Steve and Nancy Renfeldt... it is so obvious. Get a judgement... go after them with the Department of Real Estate... and get them out of the Industry!

can you say wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:58 AM:SHADY ?? I agree some heads need to roll here...

Kat wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:22 AM:It sounds like the journalist has investment property he can't sell...
why don't you do a story about how the banks are Not working woth homeowners because they keep being bailed out by the government.And before you start your local witch hunt, why don't you take a look at yourself and look at the mess you got yourself in.I do not know these peopleand after reading your accusition it makes me sick that people out of touch of what is really going on is sooooo easy to jump in the wagon and fry them bad people!!!! After all it is because of them the way the ecomony is....

ice weasel wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:40 AM:It's just another pump and dump from less than honest property owners. And while it's an old and typical story in Escondido it is one very much worth reporting.

Grump wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:46 AM:Everyone involved deserves to lose their money.

Beer thief wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:54 AM:Looks like we're getting to the bottom of this. There's no telling how many more crazy real estate deals will turn up!

truthfinder wrote on Aug 17, 2008 3:30 PM:I suggest that this article may be onesided and that judgement needs to be reserved until all sides can be heard. Several of the 'victims' in the story don't sound that innocent to me. There is an agenda going on here, let's not rush to condemn before we find out the truth.

DeBunker wrote on Aug 17, 2008 5:42 PM:Hey, why the skepticism? George Chamberlin has been telling for 2 years now that you can't lose by investing in North County real estate.

To Kat wrote on Aug 17, 2008 5:43 PM:Spell check & double check your grammar before posting.

buyer wrote on Aug 17, 2008 5:45 PM:Does truthfinder want to sell me a condo? Where do I sign?

If it walks like a duck wrote on Aug 17, 2008 6:46 PM:Good job NCT! While Esco is not the gold coast of Florida (the valhalla of real estate fraud), good investigative reporting brings a lot of these shady deals to the attention of authorities. Perhaps the Renfeldts should use some of their ill gotten gains to shop for his 'n hers orange jumpsuits. Can't wait to see a photo in NCT of the perp walk!!

Umm.. wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:35 PM:"I don't know if it was a deed. I just trusted her; I was a friend," ... adding she never planned to buy the condo.

Oh, so you just signed it. You didn't read it. Right. Sign your house over to me, will ya?

He Said to to Kat wrote on Aug 18, 2008 6:09 AM:5:43 PM post...I hope you were able to rest your thinking process after the effort expended to create such a meaningful contribution to the subject matter.

Graham wrote on Aug 18, 2008 6:55 AM:Where there's smoke, there's fire. Smoke 'em out!!

gimmeabreak wrote on Aug 18, 2008 7:29 AM:This thing stinks; anyone remember J.David Dominelli? Pyramid schemes? "Byuing" a condo with no money down in this market while the "Developer" pays the mortgage for a year, then you get out with $50,000.00? What is that, renting a group of someone's credit ratings? No thought given to what this would do to the larger real estate market, or how it might hurt 3d parties not mentioned in the story? There's more to this iceberg than just this article.

Non U.S. wrote on Aug 18, 2008 8:22 AM:Note that the person making the questionable purchase is not from the U.S. More problems caused by those from outside the U.S. that we all pay for.

Wow wrote on Aug 18, 2008 8:30 AM:to Ummm.....
That is called Fraud in the Inducement - it happens all the time. The problem is some (not all) mortgage brokers did their thing by luring those who didn't understand the game and have bad credit. They double dip from both the escrow and the points that people are eligible for and get it up front....Another giant scheme that the government got wind of 3 years after it happened already.

Dragnet wrote on Aug 19, 2008 11:58 AM:Who are the other "Lucky buyers" of these magical condo units, and were they all promised a similar deal as the Roberts'? Solve the mystery . . .

crimedog wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:28 PM:You people are lame to read this article and then sit here and post messages about it. Don't we all have bigger things to worry about??

B wrote on Aug 26, 2008 11:49 AM:Crimedog. Why comment then yourself?
I however, agree with Kat. there may be more to this story, but it sure isn't looking good for these people. If guilty, let them pay the price for their crimes.
I personally think the "eye for an eye" system would work much better. Remember the kid some years ago that got caned for littering or graffiti or something like that in Singapore? I bet he never littered again.

NCountyLoanofficer wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:37 AM:I'm very familiar with these transactions, and the very scary part is the depth of the fraud involved. From the appriaser, to the escrow company, to the mortgage broker and the Realtor; everyone envolved had to lie for these transactions to occur. I'm hoping the DA steps in to hold everyone accountable.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos