POWAY: City revising housing element
Density, height changes accepted to accommodate affordable housing
By GARY WARTH - Staff Writer | ∞
POWAY ---- A divided Poway City Council agreed this week to revise an affordable housing plan that will permit three-story buildings and more housing units than currently allowed at nine sites.
"If I had my way and I thought it would do any good, I'd vote no on this," Councilman Bob Emery said about the state-mandated revision. "But I don't think it will do any good. I think this is the best we can do."
State law requires that California cities update the housing elements of their general plans every five years, city planner Patti Brindle said in a presentation to the council Tuesday night. Cities use general plans as blueprints for future growth.
The revision for the general plan was approved 3-1, with council members Betty Rexford opposing and Merrilee Boyack absent.
The city is not mandated to build affordable houses under the revision, but it does have to show it has the land and appropriate zoning to accommodate projected growth, Brindle said.
State law requires all California cities to share in the housing needs of people from all incomes as the state's population grows.
"The importance of having a certified housing element has become more significant in recent years as state housing laws have gotten stricter with greater enforcement by the state," Brindle said, adding that fighting the mandate could reduce the city's ability to compete for state transportation and housing funding.
The state and the San Diego Association of Governments in 2003 projected that Poway would need 1,242 more housing units by June 2010. Accounting for houses built since then, Poway still will need 682 more units, including 60 priced for very-low income, 173 for low income, 207 for moderate income and 242 for above-moderate income, according to the projections.
Accommodating the housing would require changes to the density and height restriction at nine sites within the city's affordable housing areas, Brindle said. The change expands the density from 25 to 30 units an acre and the height restriction from two stories to three, up to 35 feet high.
Seven of the nine sites are in the mixed-use area of Poway Road and the other two are in the commercial office zone on Monte Vista Road. One of the Monte Vista sites is owned by the Poway Redevelopment Association and the other is the Country Montessori School site.
The idea of amending the density and height requirements of the city's housing element did not go over well with some residents who spoke at this week's meeting.
"What about our quality of life?" Dee Fleischman asked. "What about joining with other communities who are concerned with this? Are we going to roll over and play dead?"
Tom Scott, executive director of the San Diego Housing Federation, said during Tuesday's meeting that he supported the revision.
"Poway has set a model for doing affordable housing right," he said, adding that allowing three-story buildings will not change the character of the city.
In voting against the amendment, Rexford said that while she understands the city has to adhere to the state mandate for affordable housing, she was opposed to three-story buildings.
"I'm from back east, and I've seen what happens to some of the larger projects they've put back there," she said. "I cannot support three stories."
Contact staff writer Gary Warth at (760) 740-5410 or gwarth@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Why wrote on Aug 22, 2008 2:27 PM:does the county have no problem telling the state to get lost when it comes to medical marijuana, but communities like Poway just roll over and accept idiotic rules like mandatory low cost housing requirements. I say Poway should tell the state NO, we are not building any more low cost housing. Poway sends more sales tax money to the state then they receive back in services, so any threat of cutting off state funding is not much of a threat. Until Rancho Santa Fe begins to build low cost housing in their neighborhood, Poway should refuse this lame state mandate.
suzyque wrote on Aug 23, 2008 7:54 AM:I'm tired of hearing Poway city council members bellyache about meeting state housing requirements.
They keep approving industrial projects and big box stores. I remember them crowing about the thousands of jobs Geico would bring to the city. Where are those workers supposed to live? Poway wants to pay National City to build their share of affordable housing while they rake in the tax revenue from their industrial and retail properties.
suzyque wrote on Aug 23, 2008 8:05 AM:Poway doesn't need to go to 3 stories to meet their affordable housing needs. There are a lot of estates in Poway sitting on huge parcels of land. If the city bought up a couple of them they could build nice looking compatible units and meet all of our housing needs. But the council only builds affordable housing in a tight, already crowded area near Valley School. There is only one big park and a few postage stamp sized parks nearby. Building 3 story units in that area will have a huge impact on traffic, noise and services (especially parks and schools) in that area.
suzyque wrote on Aug 23, 2008 9:17 AM:Why,
It is the state that sets housing mandates, not the county. The state wants a balance between residential housing, commercial and industrial. Since Prop 13 was passed, a city does not get very much tax revenue from residential property so they zone as much land as possible for commercial and industrial. That way they get sales tax AND property tax and other business related fees.
In addition, Poway set aside almost all undeveloped land into a redevelopment area. Redevelopment is a state program for revitalizing run down urban areas with new jobs and housing. Poway's redevelopment area is bigger than San Diego's. They wanted the tax increment from new development. They didn't want to build the affordable housing - but that was a requirement of forming a redevelopment area. Poway only wants the benefit of the redevelopment area (keeping the property tax money that would otherwise go to the state) and not the responsibility (building affordable housing).
Every time a new retail or industrial project comes up, the council approves it. They know that means they have to build more affordable housing, but then whine and say the state shouldn't tell them what to do. But then they approve the affordable housing because they know they have to. The whining is just an act for the voters so they won't blame the council for being big developers. It is a sad joke, but the voters of Poway buy it every time.
CONCERNED POWEGIAN wrote on Aug 23, 2008 11:45 AM:Once again, Poway is changing its sacred general plan and bending its own guidelines regarding height limits and density limits on the HOUSING ELEMENT REPORT to satisfy REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY requirements (in addition to state housing mandates). While our Mayor and City Council members whine and complain about state mandates --- this is a smokescreen. It is actually REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY requirements which are driving this plan to add more and more affordable housing in Poway.
And, as always, it is South Poway that bears the burden of these requirements --- all within a radius of less than 2 miles in the city’s core area. It is important to note that the northern area of our city NEVER shares this burden, although there is plenty of empty land and resources in this section of the city. The disparity between north and south Poway has gone beyond very lopsided to totally ridiculous and unfair.
Our City Council/Redevelopment Agency is determined to increase the density of the already overly dense South Poway area (and all the negative impacts that go with it) way beyond its own guidelines. They approve one affordable housing development after another --- over and over --- all in South Poway to make it even more so. Why???? --- BECAUSE NONE OF THESE CITY COUNCIL FOLKS LIVE IN THE CORE AREA OF OUR CITY --- they all live up north (or on the Scripps Ranch border). And the primary reason is because of REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY requirements to utilize 20% of its funding for affordable housing.
Thank you, Betty Rexford, for your lone vote against the housing mandate and the major changes it would require to the general plan guidelines.
Wake up, Powegians….. there is a City Council election for 2 seats coming up in November.
- Burst pipe causes 70-foot-deep sink hole in Carlsbad (2501)
- REGION: State green power plan will cost consumers billions (1487)
- HOUSING: Fraud victims struggle to regain cash, credit (1412)
- REGION: Talk of new immigration bill gets mixed reaction (1130)
- VISTA: Grocer brothers suspected of threatening former butcher (1049)
Advertisement
Videos
Advertisement



