MILITARY: Review of Peralta decision sought

Delegation petitions Bush for second look at Marine denied Medal of Honor

By MARK WALKER - Staff Writer | Friday, September 19, 2008 8:12 PM PDT

Sgt. Rafael Peralta (Courtesy photo)

President Bush has been asked to review a decision denying the Medal of Honor to a Marine who witnesses say covered a grenade with his body to save the lives of fellow Marines during a firefight in Iraq.


MILITARY: Medal decisions usually stand


In a letter sent to the White House on Friday, San Diego County's congressional delegation and California's two U.S. senators said that "intentionally absorbing a grenade blast to protect one's comrades in arms has been traditionally recognized by awarding the Medal of Honor."

On Wednesday, the Marine Corps announced that Sgt. Rafael Peralta was being honored posthumously with the Navy Cross, the second-highest award a Marine can receive for valor in combat.

The president awards the Medal of Honor on behalf of Congress following a nomination by the service branch and an exhaustive review.

A San Diego resident, Peralta died Nov. 15, 2004, when he and fellow Marines attached to Camp Pendleton's 1st Marine Division attacked three insurgents inside a house in Fallujah during one of the largest battles of the Iraq war.

Peralta had been wounded by an accidental shot to the head from another Marine and was on the floor when the grenade was tossed into the room.

The Marines with Peralta that day say they saw him reach out with his right arm and drag the grenade to his body moments before it exploded.

U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Alpine, said he believes Peralta deserves the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military honor.

"Sergeant Peralta's actions are the traditional measure of heroism and selflessness by which the Medal of Honor is awarded," said Hunter, the ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee. "He knowingly made a split-second decision to give his life for his fellow Marines and country. Sergeant Peralta deserves the Medal of Honor and I hope the president will reconsider this decision."

Peralta's mother, Rosa, has said that she is considering refusing the Navy Cross. On Wednesday, she told the North County Times that because Bush had singled him out in a speech, she was upset her son was not getting the Medal of Honor.

On Memorial Day 2005, Bush told an audience that the 25-year-old Peralta "understood that America faces dangerous enemies, and he knew the sacrifices required to defeat them."

A panel appointed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates rejected the nomination based upon a medical expert's conclusion that the head wound Peralta suffered made it unlikely that he could have deliberately reached for the grenade.

Other medical experts made the opposite determination, according to a report released by the Marine Corps on Thursday. They concluded that, while mortally wounded, Peralta was physically able to reach for the grenade before he died.

The delegation letter cites the case of Marine Cpl. Jason Dunham. He was posthumously given the Medal of Honor for an act nearly identical to Peralta's: using his body to absorb a grenade blast in April 2004 in Iraq.

"The sacrifice of Sergeant Peralta manifests the same devotion to one's comrades and country as that displayed by Jason Dunham," the congressional letter reads. "Unless a strong distinction is drawn between his actions and those of Corporal Dunham, (we request) Sergeant Peralta be posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor."

In addition to Hunter, the letter is signed by Democratic U.S. Reps. Susan Davis and Bob Filner of San Diego as well as Republican U.S. Reps. Darrell Issa of Vista, and Brian Bilbray of Solana Beach.

California Democratic U.S. Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer also signed the petition.

Peralta's brother-in-law, David Donald, said Friday that the family is heartened by the congressional letter and other expressions of support received this week.

"The letter says a lot that has been on our minds and states very well what we hope happens," Donald said. "We just don't understand the decision."

In the announcement that Peralta was receiving the Navy Cross, Navy Secretary Donald Winter made it clear that he believed Peralta's act was deliberate.

"Without hesitation and with complete disregard for his own personal safety, Sergeant Peralta reached out and pulled the grenade to his body, absorbing the brunt of the blast and shielding fellow Marines only feet away," the citation signed by Winter reads.

The Defense Department issued a statement Thursday defending the panel's decision.

"Secretary Gates did not arrive at this decision lightly, which is evident by the rigorous and thorough review that was conducted," the statement said.

A Marine Corps spokesman at the Pentagon said the service would have no comment on the congressional petition.

Peralta emmigrated with his family from Tijuana at age 15. He is buried at Fort Rosecrans National Cemetery in Point Loma.

Contact staff writer Mark Walker at (760) 740-3529 or mlwalker@nctimes.com.

See related story:

MILITARY: Marines unhappy with Peralta decision

Next Previous
Bookmark and Share

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

Does not make sense wrote on Sep 19, 2008 12:46 PM:If his actions were just spasms and involuntary (as the board stated) then he should only be getting a Purple Heart.

JimRT wrote on Sep 19, 2008 12:55 PM:We can make a difference. Don't let this go. We need to demand that this be made right.

MIke the Marine wrote on Sep 19, 2008 1:45 PM:Does not make sense hits a key point. If Sgt. Peralta's actions were an uncontrolled spasm, then it wasn't an act of heroism, so why award the Navy Cross, the nations second highest award. It makes me feel proud that the Marines are questioning this bureaucratic blunder and I wish his mother god sppe on her quest to see that her son is honored as he should be. Semper Fi.

BS wrote on Sep 19, 2008 2:13 PM:Give him the Medal of Honor for God's sake! He gave his life to save his fellow marines. No greater gift can be given and should be rewarded accordingly. As the mother of a Marine...my heart goes out to this family for their loss and I thank them and thier son for that enormoous gift. God be with you all.

AW4cryinoutloud wrote on Sep 19, 2008 3:31 PM:If the DOD and Pentagon weren't so focused on persecuting Marines and making war criminals of them they might get their act together and do the right thing for "every" member of the armed services who "willingly" gave his or her life for their comrades and country. What's up with the greedy mindset against giving the MOH to deserved veterans anyway? It's a medal "earned" through great heroism. What true patriotic American would deny its award to those who earned it? Answer! NO true patriotic American would.

Massachusetts Democrat wrote on Sep 19, 2008 4:13 PM:Neither Sec. Gates or Gen. Casey were in the room where Sgt. Peralta, though wounded, absorbed the blast of the grenade that saved Marine lives.

He either fell on top of it after being wounded in which case no medal other than the Purple Heart is warranted; or he pulled it close enough to his body to absorb the blast in which case the MOH is deserved. Case closed.

Both cannot be true at the same time.

To attribute Sgt. Peralta's actions to 'uncontrolled spasms' is absurd and an affront to his honored memory.

Sgt. Peralta's memory, his sacrifice, his actions, his life, his family and his fellow Marines who are eating dinner out of a plastic bag tonight and showering once a month deserve better from us.

But then again we're too worried about our portfolios or whether we'll make it ontime to the Vineyard ferry to worry about such distractions.

I'm sorry and ashamed.

Perhaps the Congress, once they get through bailing out incompetent millionaires this weekend, can prevail upon Sec. Winter to pry some of his NCIS Gestapo agents away from the 'Haditha' case to look into this matter further.

Dennis wrote on Sep 19, 2008 5:02 PM:Let's throw one at the Board and see what their reactions are!!! You know he grabed it, if it was refelx he would have just been batting it away, like the boards so called decision should be!

Marine SSgt from Temecula wrote on Sep 19, 2008 7:21 PM:It's a disgrace on how all this is going on. This Marine gave his life for his country and for his Marines. It is also sorry to say that the Commandant of the Marine Corps can have no say so in this matter. This Marine gave his life for his country and he deserves this medal. General Conway you are ... for not putting up the fight for your Marine. You can make all these changes in your Corps but do nothing for this Marine. Lead from the top Sir and the same for the SgtMaj of the Marine Corps. Give a fellow what a Marine he deserves. Look at the rest of the Medal of Hor citations. Semper Fi brother and Rafa may you Rest in Peace

crazy indin wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:46 PM:if this were an officer, everybody from the commandant on down would be scramimg to up grade the award. but they wouldn't waste time on an enlisted man. Same old crap the Marine Corps hasn't changed, and it never well.

Registered Comments[-]Go to Top

Advertisement

Videos