REGION: Stage set for southern power line
State judge to propose route for SDG&E's project
By DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer | ∞
The curtain is expected to rise Friday on the long-awaited proposed decision on San Diego Gas & Electric Co.'s controversial $1.5 billion Sunrise power line.
And observers say the stage is set for an alternate southern San Diego County route to be recommended by California Public Utilities Commission Administrative Law Judge Jean Vieth.
SDG&E officials long have preferred a 150-mile route that would wind through 600,000-acre Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, the nation's largest state park outside of Alaska, as well as through Ranchita, Santa Ysabel, Ramona and Rancho Penasquitos.
Now word on the street is the alternate route will be selected because of overwhelming political opposition to putting 160-foot-high metal towers across a wilderness known for its dramatic panoramic views, colorful spring wildflowers and endangered bighorn sheep.
"If the CPUC selects the southern route for Sunrise (Powerlink), it's a buildable route we can support," said Jennifer Briscoe, a spokeswoman for SDG&E, in a telephone interview Wednesday. "We realize that there was a great deal of sensitivity around the park."
Besides the park, the alternate route would pass to the south of North County's backcountry communities. And Briscoe said the 123-mile southern line would stop short of Rancho Penasquitos.
Whatever the administrative law judge chooses, it will be a recommendation. It will be up to the five-member Public Utilities Commission to decide the project's fate.
Commissioners are scheduled to hear arguments from the utility and project opponents Nov. 7 in San Francisco, and to deliver a decision in December. The U.S. Bureau of Land Management is expected to decide by January whether to let SDG&E cross federal land.
"My sense is that the commission is not inclined to reject the line outright, given the governor's support for the project," said Michael Shames, executive director for the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a San Diego consumer advocacy group that has been arguing the line would be too costly. "But it seems SDG&E has conceded that the CPUC will not approve a line through Anza-Borrego Desert State Park."
Lisa Page, a spokeswoman for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, said that while the governor believes the line is needed to provide access to desert solar and wind power, "he has said he doesn't want it to go through the park if that can be avoided."
As a result, said Diana Lindsay, vice president of environmental affairs for the Anza-Borrego Foundation & Institute, "I think they (utility officials) are finally running scared. ... They'll take anything they can get."
Briscoe said the utility, however, has not abandoned the northern route. Rather, SDG&E is now willing to build a line to the south because the initial southern route was modified by the commission staff at the utility's request, she said.
SDG&E long opposed a southern route, saying it would torpedo a project goal of providing another conduit for electricity to travel to metropolitan San Diego many miles north of the existing Southwest Powerlink line that runs along the border. If the lines were next to each other, officials contended, both could be knocked out at the same time by a wildfire.
The company, which serves 1.4 million homes and businesses in San Diego County and southern Orange County, also objected to the southern route because, initially, it entailed crossing American Indian communities opposed to the line.
But Briscoe noted that the modified route would go around those reservations.
And according to the final environmental report published in October, the alternate route would follow the path of the Southwest Powerlink for 36 miles across a desert landscape not as prone to fire as the chaparral country to the west. Then the new Sunrise Powerlink would break to the north.
Crossing Interstate 8, the wires would be routed north around the Campo, La Posta and Manzanita reservations, and south around the Cleveland National Forest. It would follow Interstate 8 in parts of East County and run underground for 8.3 miles through the Alpine area.
The line would follow Highway 67 around San Vicente Reservoir before heading west to the Sycamore Canyon Substation in Scripps Ranch.
At a new substation east of Alpine, the line would convert from 500-kilovolt wires to ones that carry 230 kilovolts, something utility officials say is necessary to lay cables underground.
"If a southern route is recommended, or a nonwires alternative is recommended, we will be ecstatic," said Lindsay of the Anza-Borrego foundation.
Besides a southern route, the administrative judge is considering such alternatives as local natural gas-fired power plants and networks of rooftop solar panels. All of those options would be more friendly to the environment than would the northern route, according to the environmental report.
A southern route also would be good news for rural North County, Shames said.
But that wouldn't put Donna Murdoch, who lives in the San Diego Country Estates area near Ramona, at ease.
"Don't get me wrong, I don't want it near me," Murdoch said. "But I don't want it near anybody else, either. And I don't trust anything that SDG&E says. They still prefer the northern route. I won't trust a thing they say until the poles are in the ground."
Contact staff writer Dave Downey at (760) 745-6611, Ext. 2623, or ddowney@nctimes.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Floyd wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:54 PM:The powerline will be in Southern California. The company is in Soutern California. The opponents are in Southern California. So the PUC holds the hearing in San Francisco? What am I missing, here?
Derek wrote on Oct 29, 2008 11:14 PM:California is too big and populous to be just one state anymore.
Solar would be too easy wrote on Oct 30, 2008 6:57 AM:Why not the network of rooftop solar panels, or would that just be too sensible for SDGE and the PUC. The future is in solar, wind and water power, not fossil fuel power, and it is too bad that SDGE doesn't follow suit with its brethren in the north that are providing the incentives for solar panels the way SDGE provides retro-fit lighting to save energy. Too easy ? This is one of the best places for solar power. Why not be able to use it !
To Solar would be wrote on Oct 30, 2008 7:12 AM:Please, put down the Kool Aide and read the facts. This line will transmit solar, geo and wind power. Take a drive to El Centro it is not that far. Sun shines year round, wind blows and there is thermals all over. Much better to have a centralized solar farm, wind turbines then having them scattered all over the country side. Read Pickens plan.
No more power lines wrote on Oct 30, 2008 7:41 AM:Maybe some people will LEAVE this state if we jack the price of power x10. Raise the price, limit availability, move somewhere else.
Wake Up wrote on Oct 30, 2008 8:27 AM:This line will be transporting electricity from Sempras Mexican power plants powered by natural gas brought from Indonesia to Sempras huge new facility just north of Ensenada. It is a bait and switch. No matter how the PUC rules, the feds can overrule their decision based on Cheneys 2001 creation of Strategic Power Corridors. Profits will find their way into Bushs pocket via the Carlyle group, Sempras equity partner.
GordoninSD wrote on Oct 30, 2008 11:20 AM:To Wake Up:
I've heard this Mexico theory many times before, but I've never seen proof. Please provide. There is no question that solar and wind are plentiful in an area exactly where SUnrise would go. But the Mexico idea sounds like speculation.
Wake up wrote on Oct 30, 2008 1:53 PM:I can't post links and I'm reluctant to do your research for you. If you are aware of the exact area that Sunrise would go, you should also be aware that the eastern terminus of the Powerlink is at the 160 MW feeder link for the Sempra-owned gas-fired plant that lies three miles across the border; a plant immune to California environmental laws.
Contrary to being speculation, the 'Mexico theory' is validated by a host of public records and filings. Sempra just completed the massive terminal, Energia Costa Azul, a hundred miles down the coast and will be bringing in billions of cubic feet of LNG from Asia., which will be used to power its generating plants in Mexico.
Youre Right On wrote on Oct 30, 2008 4:52 PM:Wake Up is right on! This has nothing to do about solar in the desert but everything to with the bait and switch SDGE .. .who within five years will be using unregulated powerplants in Mexico. The only reason that solar/wind is even mentioned by SDGE is because of California's new state requirements that mandate some future green energy.
If you've followed the dialogue and spin by Sempra and SDGE over the years. . .you'd know they've just dead lied. State regulators are very critical of the plan right now, and justifiably so.
Of course, we haven't even mentioned other proposed pollution spewing Mexican powerplants in the works. I guess you can't check on things that aren't there . . . yet. How convenient!
Nice transparency.
To Solar Would Be. ..it is with considerable naivete that you ask bloggers to put down the Kool Aid? Too funny.
It would help if you were informed enough to share some facts other than the ones shared by the energy companies.. ..or do you work for them?!
To Right On wrote on Oct 30, 2008 7:09 PM:The first Sempra-owned Mexican power plant (located 115 miles east of San Diego) began selling electricity to California in 2003. Many others to follow. Both northern and southern Powerlink routes end at the feeder link to the 620 MW Termoelectrica Mexicali plant. So much for the Powerlink tranmitting solar power.
- Burst pipe causes 70-foot-deep sink hole in Carlsbad (2466)
- REGION: State green power plan will cost consumers billions (1444)
- HOUSING: Fraud victims struggle to regain cash, credit (1399)
- REGION: Talk of new immigration bill gets mixed reaction (1053)
- VISTA: Grocer brothers suspected of threatening former butcher (1033)
Advertisement





