ESCONDIDO: Four issues emerge as key to City Council race

By DAVID GARRICK - Staff Writer | Saturday, November 1, 2008 6:37 PM PDT

ESCONDIDO ---- While the candidates for Escondido City Council have debated everything from park maintenance to West Nile virus during this fall's campaign, four issues have emerged as the most divisive.

-- A proposed overnight parking ordinance

-- City plans to spend $19 million on a downtown hotel

-- Allowing police officers living far from Escondido to drive patrol cars home

-- Whether the city should fully staff its new fire stations

Challengers Olga Diaz and Richard Barron have sharply criticized incumbents Sam Abed and Ed Gallo on the parking ordinance, the hotel and the patrol car policy.

The debate about Fire Department staffing has blurred the line between the incumbents and the challengers, but the issue has still been divisive.

Diaz and Abed have been endorsed by the firefighters union for supporting the hiring of more firefighters and for rejecting city plans to staff the new stations by shuffling existing employees.

Gallo supports the city's redeployment plans, a stance that has prompted the firefighters union to launch an aggressive campaign against him.

And Barron has suggested the city vary fire staffing, with more employees during fire season and fewer employees during rainy months.

Two other candidates in the race, Chuck Voelker and Dennis French, are political novices who have raised less than $2,000 each. Meanwhile, Abed has raised more than $46,000, Diaz $35,000, Gallo $29,000 and Barron $15,000.

The parking ordinance

Diaz and Barron have strongly criticized the current City Council's efforts to craft an overnight parking ordinance, which would attempt to alleviate overcrowding in some predominantly Latino neighborhoods by requiring permits for street parking.

Citing a consultant's study, Diaz contends the city's parking problems are so small and scattered that an ordinance is the wrong way to go.

"The problem is not big enough to warrant the expense and the hassle," Diaz said in an interview last week. "The whole thing is a fiasco that has generated a lot of opposition and very little support."

Barron's concerns are more technical.

"It would be unenforceable the way they've conceived it to date," said Barron, contending that police officers would have to scour the streets for violators during the wee hours of the morning.

Diaz and Barron have suggested the city work with individual neighborhoods that have specific problems, instead of passing a "blanket" ordinance.

Gallo has defended the proposed parking restrictions, contending they would improve the "quality of life" in many neighborhoods.

"We hear from so many people that they can't park in front of their house," said Gallo, explaining that the council has carefully honed the ordinance down to "problem" neighborhoods in central Escondido. "We have to do something."

Abed, who strongly supported the parking restrictions when they were first proposed in spring 2007, has become steadily more skeptical.

Last spring, Abed broke with his traditional allies on the council, Gallo and Councilwoman Marie Waldron, by rejecting plans for a citywide ordinance in favor of targeting the city's urban core.

Last week, he retreated further by saying he planned to support parking restrictions only in neighborhoods that sign petitions requesting them.

He said that such an approach would avoid burdening neighborhoods that have only minor parking problems, while also making the ordinance less susceptible to legal challenges.

"We need the smallest possible amount of regulation that will solve the problems," Abed said.

The downtown Marriott

Barron and Diaz contend that the city should immediately back out of an agreement to provide nearly $19 million of city money to a developer planning to build a seven-story, $67 million Marriott hotel next to City Hall.

"The hotel is an extravagance we don't need," said Barron. "We should put it off until we can afford it."

Diaz said the money for the hotel was "scraped together" when the city was collecting enormous sales tax revenues from its 20 auto dealers and the Westfield mall. Now that the recession has dramatically reduced those revenues, the city should use the $19 million to help avoid making severe budget cuts.

"We need to consider that money a nest egg," she said.

But Gallo and Abed said it would be shortsighted to kill a project that will eventually generate enormous revenues for the city by boosting downtown businesses and the performing arts center.

"This hotel will bring Escondido to the next economic level," Abed said.

The incumbents also said it's bad policy to use one big boost of cash to cover ongoing city expenses, such as the salaries of new firefighters.

"It's really easy to imagine that money solving our problems, but the expenses will be there year after year forever," Gallo said.

Patrol cars in Riverside County

Diaz and Barron have criticized a city policy allowing police officers to take their patrol cars home at night. They have no problem with officers living in Escondido taking their cars home, but they object to officers using city fuel to drive patrol cars home to Temecula and other parts of Riverside County.

Prohibiting such long commutes would reduce city fuel costs more than $100,000 per year. But Abed and Gallo contend that is not enough money to warrant scaling back a program that improves officer morale and helps with recruiting and retention.

They also argue that it would be micromanaging for the City Council to change such a program.

"We need to put public-safety decisions in the hands of our public safety experts," said Abed, referring to police Chief Jim Maher, who strongly opposes changing the program.

Diaz contends the incumbents refuse to consider cutting the program because they are afraid of the police officers union, which has endorsed them both.

Diaz and Barron also argue that it is not micromanaging for the City Council to suggest ways to save money.

"Sam and Ed cherry-pick when they micromanage," said Diaz. "They routinely try to change city policies they don't like, but no one calls that micromanaging."

Fire staffing

The timing of the city's budget crisis couldn't be worse for the Fire Department, which plans to open three new stations in the next year.

Fire Chief Vic Reed created a plan last spring to reduce the number of employees on firetrucks from four to three in order to staff the new stations as fully as possible within financial constraints.

Gallo supported that plan, which the council adopted as part of the city budget in late June.

He said three-man trucks are the standard in most cities, and that the opening of the stations would have been delayed without the chief's plan. He also said the plan will reduce emergency response times by spreading scarce resources farther into the outskirts of the city.

Abed did not make a big issue of fire staffing during budget hearings last spring, but he did vote against the budget. During the campaign, he has also expressed support for cutting other city programs in order to avoid shuffling firefighters around.

Diaz also supports more staff for the new fire stations, which has made the firefighters union a key player in the election.

Instead of joining with the police union in support of both incumbents, the firefighters union endorsed Diaz and Abed. The union's president said last week that the union has spent about $50,000 on signs and a direct mail campaign supporting Diaz and opposing Gallo.

Contact staff writer David Garrick at (760) 740-5468 or dgarrick@nctimes.com.

Previous

Advertisement

Pre-Registration Comments[-]Go to Top

januaryM wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:08 PM:Voters can improve the QUAILTY of LIFE
in Escondido by voting OUT Abed & Gallo.

GO BARRON ,COUNCIL
GO DIAZ , COUNCIL
GO THIBADEAU , PPH BOARD
GO LEIBHAM , CONGRESS

EPD & ESCONDIDO FIREFIGHTERS ROCK!

NOV 4th do something YOU can feel good about VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE

Citizens of chamber wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:09 PM:We at the Citizens of Chamber (all four of us) think that the real issue is whether the voters will believe the false campaign of Olga Diaz. Olga Diaz is an open border sanctuary-city liberal. The proof is that she was endorsed by Bill Flores and not supported by the police department. Further, she has run a very negative campaign, which is evidenced by the bloggers on this site. She is a negative and angry person and I think that the voters will see through the falseness of her campaign and realize that she would be bad for Escondido. Vote for anybody but Olga! Stay classy.

HPST DAD wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:14 PM:"This hotel will bring Escondido to the next economic level," Abed said.


B A N K R U P T C Y



DO NOT RE ELECT ABED / GALLO

Clueless Lisa wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:18 PM:I agree with Citizens of Chamber. How do I join your fine organization?

Brenda wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:23 PM:"It's really easy to imagine that money solving our problems, but the expenses will be there year after year forever," Gallo said.

______________________________________
Ed you forgot to tell us that the DEFICIT will ONLY be there ,
year after year ,
after year just growing like huge tumor!

This type of logic is.......ignorant.
Proof is everywhere you look in Escondido.

VOTE GALLO & ABED OUT NOV 4th

Cotton Ballz wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:36 PM:When your City posts a deficit of
- $ 9 MILLION for the previous year 07.
The current deficit for one department of the City is already at - $ 5 MILLION.
We are 4 months into this fiscal years budget.With 8 months to go...the DEFICIT will just keep mounting as we get to July 09.....

the party is over for all employees...
you can thank this Council for mismanaging MILLIONS.....
call it whatever you want...manage/micro manage
they have failed EVERYONE in Escondido.

VOTE ABED & GALLO OUT NOV 4th
2010 VOTE THE REST OUT OUT OUT!

******gagabedgallo***********
google it!

make sure you see the NCTimes
NOV 1 2008 Section A page 11

a private citizen took the time & expense to inform all the voters
with FACTS....
thank you J Lenhard U ROCK!

HPST MOM wrote on Nov 1, 2008 7:46 PM:I saw the Firefighters with the anti Gallo banners on their truck today. Olga Diaz was with them.
People were honking their horns,waving and cheering in support.
When people feel so strongly about the issues it moves you.

I will cast my vote for Olga Diaz.

Thank you Firefighters.

Escondeeter wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:03 PM:Once again, David has gotten it wrong, most likely because the fire union has been working very hard to confuse the issue. The city's engine companies have been staffed with three for many, many years, if not forever. The proposed reduction from four to three is for only ONE piece of apparatus, the city's aerial platform, called colloquially, the 'truck company'. David keeps mixing up 'truck company', which is a name for one piece of apparatus, with 'fire truck' which is a generic term for any fire suppression vehicle. It's amazing how many times he's done this. It's almost like he's just cutting and pasting his first erroneous story into every one that follows.

As far as Barron's stroke of genius about cutting back staffing during the winter, you really have to wonder if anyone has explained to him that eighty percent of the fire department's workload is medical calls. You also have to wonder whether anyone has ever explained to him that, except for the rare wildfire events, residential structure fires are more common in winter months than summer months. And these are the guys who want to tell us how to run public safety, amazing!

The proper way to staff a fire department is to have enough people to provide the desired quality of service on a regular basis, then overstaff through call-backs, overtime, and shift extensions during periods of high fire danger. That's what this department, and municipal department I've ever seen has been doing. I can just imagine the fire union's response when Barron tells them he wants to lay off people every fall. Get ready for those Barron signs with the circle and slash on 'em.

Richard has validated the statement of the incumbents that policy makers should stick to making policy and let people who have some idea what they're doing manage the city's departments.

Get Along wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:26 PM:Can't everyone just get along?

Voter wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:27 PM:Why is the Arts Center not an issue?
This is a City owned facility for those who aren't aware. Blaming economic downturns,artistic staff layoffs, and Ms. Basehore's hiding behind foolish donors will not keep The Center bouyant. When will the Board of Directors realize the root of the problem in this case is not the supporting staff. Clearly the Board consists of Ms. Basehores' "yes people" or this would never have been able to go on to financial ruin.
Mayor Philer, it will take more than a village to fix this one

Straight Talk wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:29 PM:If you really want to know the facts of the take home car issue, read on. In fact just see this blog as an extension of the article; this is information the public needs to have in order to understand this issue which has, unfortunately, become unneccesarily heated and divisive.

The personal patrol car plan is a recruiting tool. It provides every patrol officer, even the brand new rookies, with a vehicle assigned only to them. Just one officer drives every car. The officer gets to put all his or her work equipment in the trunk and even "set up" the interior the way they want. It is the only such plan in the County. It is unique to EPD. This policy has been around for over 20 years and it is a terrific recruiting tool. Along with that benefit, officers who live in Escondido or within 10 miles of Escondido have always had the option of driving their vehicles home at the end of shift. Two reasons. First and formost because Escondido citizens generally like have a patrol car parked in their neighborhoods. Secondly, it cuts down on the number of cars parked in the PD lot which is always impacted with too many cars and not enough parking. The value of the personal patrol car policy has never been questioned and it has never been suggested by anyone that the program be ended.

K-9 Officers have always been exempt from the ten mile limit because of the unique nature of their "police equipment."

About ten years ago, when gas was about 1.10 a gallon, the take home policy was expanded to include detectives who lived more than ten miles away. Mostly, up in Riverside County. This was justified because detectives, on occasion, respond to "call outs". A busy detective might get called out 6-10 times a year. Then again, some detectives never get called out. The policy was expanded to all detectives, regardless of assignment, to take their cars home. Another reason for expanding the policy was to keep detectives from leaving EPD for other agencies; specifically Riverside DA's office. This created the first list of police personnel, other than K-9's, allowed to take their cars home beyond the ten mile limit.

It wasn't too long after the Detectives started taking their cars home, when SWAT officers requested to be added to the exemption list. SWAT Officers wanted to take their cars home saying they, like detectives, were subject to call out. SWAT Cops were added and soon after that came the Emergency Negotiators who asked to be added to the list under the same rational.
The "emergency response" rational for take home patrol cars is questionable. The number of unplanned, unexpected emergency call outs at EPD for SWAT/ENT is on average 4 or 5 occasions a year. The police department is located 2 blocks from I-15 and every officer coming into town passes by the PD. The officers personal patrol car would be ready to go into service immediately upon the officers arrival. It is most often the case that even in emergency call outs officers first come to the department for one reason or another. These facts call into question the public safety rational that has somehow become a part of the argument for commuting extended distances in city emergency vehicles.
EPD now has 20-30 SWAT/ENT personnel that live beyond the original ten mile limit who commute as long as 30, 40 and 50 miles one way. It should be noted officers do not just commute for work. They also commute for court, for training, for miscellaneous meetings and for activities that are at best remotely related to their primary functions and certainly nothing to do with emergency response.
Since the original program was expanded to include Detectives, SWAT and ENT the cost of fuel has increased over 200%. The EPD now has numerous patrol vehicles that are less than four years old that are approaching 100,000 miles, greatly reducing the shelf life of the $40,000.00 patrol vehicle. Many Officers of EPD are now driving emergency vehicles with over 110,000 miles. Over a half million commuter miles a year have been tacked on to this program in the past ten years. When considering fuel and wear and tear on the car, the expense of the expanded milage allowance is estmiated at $200,000 - $300,000 a year.

This is the reality of EPD take home cars.

The Best wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:44 PM:VOTE FOR THE BEST:

DIAZ AND BARRON

Flip Flop wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:54 PM:Ahhh the as fore-seen flip flopping words of one running for re-election.

So...Sam Abed has done the big FLIP on the parking ordinance.

Nice way to try to "appeal" to your audience!!!

You (Sam) have already wasted a great deal of taxpayer's money on your parking witch hunt...

You (Sam) have already wasted a great deal of precious city time & resources...

You (Sam) have already caused a good many honest and hard-working residents alot of grief over this whole "proposal".

The DAMAGE is DONE - you cannot go back - you cannot take it away - you cannot undo it. Your words are DEAFENED by your ACTIONS!!!

Sam should spend some time trying to explain the newly announced $5 million dollar DEFICIT (up from $1.6)...the old "it's the economy" excuse will NOT work in this instance!!! And why the council gets another raise while the people get cut services!!! Explain that!!

I await Sam's answer!

BTW: I'm voting NO to Proposition SAM

Marriott International Inc. wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:54 PM:Marriott International signs in at the top of the lodging industry. The company is one of the world's leading hoteliers with nearly 3,000 operated or franchised properties in more than 65 countries. Marriott's hotels include such full-service brands as Renaissance Hotels and its flagship Marriott Hotels & Resorts, as well as select-service and extended-stay brands Courtyard and Fairfield Inn. It also owns the Ritz-Carlton luxury chain and resort and time-share properties operated by Marriott Vacation Club International. Marriott additionally provides more than 2,000 rental units for corporate housing and manages 45 golf courses. The Marriott family, including CEO J. W. Marriott Jr., owns about 30% of the firm.

Someone wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:58 PM:Someone is against the firefighters - they have that sign out there with the big slash.

I know Gallo is upset because the firefighters did not endorse him because Gallo did not support hiring more firefighters for the new firestations. I don't blame the FF's because we have to make sure our FF's are not in greater jeopardy because of insufficient FF's on the trucks/at the scene.

I don't like that sign and I think it is bad taste. I will not be voting for Ed Gallo.

Insider wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:58 PM:Funny. I lived in Escondido for many years and moved out for many reasons, all related to the quality of life and lack of a family-friendly environment. I work for the City and the City management is exceptional. They have many good ideas and good leaders. Unfortunately, it is unlikely to ever become a premier city in North County. Escondido has ... the lowest income average in North County. The drugs and gangs don't help either. The Center for the Arts has always been a drain on City resources and will never help Escondido become an elite "Arts" city. It's all a pipe-dream. It's not a cultural city and putting museums and arts centers won't change that. Putting a crown on a frog doesn't make it a prince. That being said, the Hotel won't be a bad thing. The City desperately needs a good Hotel. The income and jobs will help Escondido. Ultimate occupancy rates have yet to be seen. The biggest thing Escondido has going for it is the Wild Animal Park and the Auto Park. Beyond that, it will remain what it has been for the last 30 years.

Al wrote on Nov 1, 2008 9:09 PM:Stop this ridiculus development now! It is a waste of time and money.
Folks who book rooms at Marriotts's at, say, $150 a night are not the type of folks interested in Escondido! Let's be real here folks! Just a block away are a 1/2 dozen taco shops, an entire Mexican shopping center at Washingtion and Escondido Blvd, a deserted condo development eye-sore at Center City and Washington, a downtown that turns into a ghost town after 5PM, a zillion-billion Hispanics crossing the itersections pushing strollers ... and dozens of homeless and other low-life laying around during the day at Grape Day Park. This Marriott project has always been a bad investment idea!

second flip flop wrote on Nov 1, 2008 9:18 PM:Abed's second campaign flip flop.

Like I have been saying:

Abed didn't make a single effort to ensure the firefighters were staffed accordingly.

Abed didn't fight for more firefighters during budget hearings - I KNOW I WATCHED THEM!!!

In particular, when the council adopted the budget on June 18, 08, Sam's big deal was NOT the firefighters, but a charity (charity is good - but firefighters will save your life in this firezone!).

Now, the reason SAM voted against the budget is because the council wanted/needed to use $1.6 million (or thereabouts) from the Reserves to satisfy the deficit from FY 07/08 (which BTW is now $5 million).

Anyhoo, Sam didn't think the budget subcommittee had cut enough services and money from nearly every city Dept and wanted the committee/staff to cut more - so they wouldn't have to use the reserves (all the while fighting for money for the charity).

Where are his priorities? No new firefighters to staff the new firestations in California (firestorm central)!!

Abed's priorities are with the hotel - with the $18.9 MILLION DOLLARS - an "investment" which will possibly pay off in 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 years.

Abed chooses a hotel over firefighters! That's how I see it!!! I get extremely afraid - now I will be even more afraid. Last year I spent hours and hours and days and days hosing down my house. I was afraid - always pacing. I want Our City staffed with the right amount of firefighters - we are bigger now - and we need to be protected.

I'm voting no on Abed.

bryan wrote on Nov 1, 2008 9:38 PM:I couldnt believe that i read on olga diaz web site that Francine busby is a supporter of hers. Remember francine was one who said to an illegal alien, "You dont have to be legal to vote or work for my campaign." I bet busbys name will be removed from olga web site in a couple days. The day busby made that comment her political career was over. Looks like Olga will be next.

Terry wrote on Nov 1, 2008 10:12 PM:On Thursday the North County Times wrote a story about Escondido's worsening deficit. The story revealed that due to the city's growing deficit, a fire engine would not be placed at one of the new fire stations. This fire station is in the heart of the city and it is extremely dangerous not to have a fire engine at this location. Further, I would like the City Council to explain why they still support investing $19 million towards a new hotel. Our national economy is in a recessed state and is not projected to improve in the near future. It is unwise to choose economic incentives over public safety.

The current city council is not serving the best interests of the residents. It appears they are serving the few, the elite and a hotel developer. The incumbents should be replaced in November.

Tom and Janice wrote on Nov 1, 2008 10:24 PM:Tom and Janice want to extend our vote of confidence and our actual votes to Mr. Richard Barron. We believe that Mr. Barron is the most intelligent candidate on the ballot. He is even-keeled and presents legitimate alternatives to the policies currently in place. Mr. Barron should be elected to represent our city; he has alot to offer.

Imagine wrote on Nov 1, 2008 10:41 PM:Imagine This:

A Brand New Council!

Imagine Pfeiler, Waldron, Daniels, Diaz and Barron.

Imagine the dynamics. Imagine the possibilities. Imagine the balance.

Imagine a healthier city.

Imagine a healthier city council.

Imagine a life without Abed & Gallo.

It would be a dream come true!

Let's make it a reality!!

Vote for Diaz & Barron and tell your friends and family to do the same.

Imagine a Better Council - a Better City - a Better Future!!!

Believe in it and it can be achieved!!!

Diaz & Barron for Escondido City Council!!!

jerrylen wrote on Nov 1, 2008 10:50 PM:There is one more issue, not just four, and I've been talking about it for years. It's whether every person in Escondido who makes more than $151,000 should be living in a mobile home, right here, in Escondido. Sam and Ed understand that, and that's why I'm supporting them.

Dont be Misled wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:05 AM:I just received a flyer from the Escondido Police department. WOW! It states "DON'T BE MISLED: Olga Diaz is NOT Escondido's Candidate for public safety " It also says "Olga Diaz opposes efforts to make Escondido a safer city" and " She cares more about illegal than the rights of lawful citizens! Why in the world would anyone want Olga Diaz when her own husband Police Department does not even want her ????? Please support the Escondido Police officers and do not vote for Olga Diaz

To Someone wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:16 AM:I bet Ed Gallo does not want the firefighter’s endorsement. The way they play politics. Shouldn't they be saving lives instead of playing politics ??? I WILL NOT VOTE FOR ANYONE THE FIREFIGHTERS SUPPORT. Sorry Olga Diaz and Sam Abed You made your bed now you are sleeping in it….

To Imagine wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:20 AM:It would be a NIGHTMARE not a dream. Anyone BUT Olga Diaz

To The Best wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:24 AM:You need Medicine if you really believe what you are writing

To januaryM wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:28 AM:You’re Right on one thing EPD ROCK. I really believe it after I received there flyer today about Olga Diaz.You sem to be nice " Dont be Misled "

Voting For wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:29 AM:Voting For Olga & Richard

They will help restore fiscal responsibilty and fiscal accountability back to the city.

They will help bring balance to the city.

They are both educated in finances -the handling, the investing and the distribution of such.

They are successful business members of our community.

They are Escondido's best chance to move forward - it is time to take two steps forward and then two more forward.

At present, Escondido is taking one forward and two back. Our City has been taken back in time to a time of intolerance - intolerant to the poor, to the residents, to the people who look different, dress different, park different, etc...

Let's move forward with Diaz and Barron - UNDOUBTEDLY the Best Candidates!!!

Vote for Olga & Richard!!!

To Clueless Lisa wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:31 AM:How do I join your fine organization? You are Clueless Lisa if you really want to join

To Someone wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:34 AM:Someone is against the firefighters Union - they have that sign out there with the big slash YES they should be saving lives NOT playing politics

to Straight talk wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:46 AM:and EVERY ESCONDIDO POLICE OFFICER/PERSONNEL
we ALL have to do our part....it's no longer what's good for a few.
I've supported the EPD for years.NOW we citizens are asking them to support us.
Pay for your commute if you live outside the 10 mile zone.Or just leave your patrol vehicle at the station...ahhmm...I hope planners figured in enough parking at then new facility? As I remember in the beginning the current station did not have enough parking.

If you really wanted to support Escondido YOU would not have endorsed
Sam Abed & Ed Gallo....they've wasted MILLION ....the party on the tax payer is OVER.
We can revisit the "gas perk" when the city's financial problems arent looming over us all.

too late dont be wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:51 AM:EPD Officers have already been posting on the boards for weeks that an ATTORNEY for the EPOA UNION made the choice of who to endorse.
Same toad probably did the verbage on that flyer.

I guess you don't get out much..do ya?
Ask real Police Officers...not a ATTORNEY for the desperate.

HIGH FIVE wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:52 AM:januaryM
A high five to you and a knuckle bumb too!


the gagalicious girls!

Residents wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:55 AM:Residents of Escondido:

VOTE NO ON

PROPOSITION SAM ABED

AND

VOTE NO ON

PROPOSITION ED GALLO

THE CANDIDATE THAT CARES wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:57 AM:IF YOU WANT A REAL REPUBLICAN IN THE CITY COUNCIL THEN FRENCH HAS TO BE YOUR CHOICE.
DENNIS FRENCH THE CANDIDATE THAT HAS NOT ACCEPTED MONEY FROM SPECIAL INTEREST AND WON'T HAVE TO PAY FAVORS BACK TO ANYBODY
FAMILY MAN,NAVY VETERAN, BUSINESS MAN AND CHRISTIAN VOLUNTEER.

new council needed wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:58 AM:anybody but abed and gallo.
say no to intolerance

jvc wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:27 AM:The privilege will continue to dominate
our public offices as long as we continue to let them steal our elections with their PAC's!

Bob wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:33 AM:Ed Gallo is a fine gentleman and council member. His love for Escondido comes through to anybody who listens to him speak. Ed is trying his best to make Escondido a better place. He has my support for another term. Ed deserves my vote and your vote. For improved quality of life vote for Ed.

four point six wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:41 AM:That political ad in the paper, on page 11 section A, today says that $4.6 million dollars in cash and fee breaks were given to a residential developer.

Why did the Council approve this? Why did Abed and Gallo approve this?

Why is the Council giving money to developers?

Now, Abed and Gallo want to give more than $18m to a hotel developer, but they can't find the money for more firefighters. It is apparent that Abed and Gallo do not have the city's best interests in mind.

seven o nine wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:50 AM:The post at 7:09 suggests one "stay classy".

This from the blogger that slanders as he suggests.

Bigger Picture: The group that this class-less individual is attempting to defame has had a real impact over the last year. For a non-profit group, they have done a very fine job. They have established themselves and have presented legitimate intelligent arguments! They understand that there are people out there that will attempt to detour their outstanding efforts, but this group will not heed to these minor disruptions. These disruptions are like gnats and a mere swat of the hand usually squashes the annoyance.

So...rock on you volunteers - stick to your convictions - you are making an impression! And it's a good One!! Remember: Forget the Naysayers and always remember to: "Consider the Source".

9.2 MILLION and Rising wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:01 AM:RE: 9.2 MILLION : Mission Park : Moreover, spending more money on an area populated predominantly by foreign-born Spanish speakers is sure to encounter some resistance in a city where the topic of illegal immigration has sparked heated reactions on the council dais. Does anyone think this money spent over the last few years in Escondido was a worthwhile investment? What do you think the tax base to the city is in this area? Not much I would suppose.

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/07/02/news/inland/20_03_527_1_06.txt

bogie wrote on Nov 2, 2008 3:24 AM:Someone @ 8:58 PM:

The slash sign that started this was the one the firefighters hung at the street fair with Gallos name in the middle. Do you think that sign is in bad taste also? Sam and Ed all the way. Olga is endorsed by Bill Flores, enough said.

Clueless Voter wrote on Nov 2, 2008 3:29 AM:I will be voting for whomever has the most signs. The best government $ can buy. I can't spare the time to watch city council meetings and research issues. I will let others make these decisions for me. Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

I agree with Dont be Misled wrote on Nov 2, 2008 5:57 AM:Olga diaz would be BAD for city hall... Vote NO for Olga Diaz

Are they twins wrote on Nov 2, 2008 5:58 AM:Are June Rady and Olga Diaz twins they sure act that way

To januaryM wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:01 AM:I hope you are not with Acorn when you say " VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE" Please Vote but only once, It's the only fair way.

Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:14 AM:If the Escondido Police flyer is true, then I will be changing my vote. I fully support the police department.

Cops and Greed wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:36 AM:Don't be MISLED by the Police Department flyer. The don't care about your city, they care about their wallets - they want to drive their cars to Murrieta on our dime. If they liked Escondido, they'd live here. If they cared about protecting Escondido, they'd live here. If they can't get more money, they sue the city. If they don't get what they want, they threaten to leave - but not before they sling mud all over the place.

My 2 Cents wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:54 AM:I wish more or you knew the real deal here. Escondeeter, you have hit the nail on the head. It always amazes me how much worth is put on the word of the media. Why is it that people are so quick to belive what is written in the papers? Don't believe everything you read Terry, and don't fall in to bad politics. Do you seriously think a negative, angry woman with no political experience is going to skip in and fix it all? Are you serious?
Be carefull what you wish for people.

To Marriot Inc. wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:58 AM:The Marriot company is not being criticized - they own and operate spectacular hotels all over the world. We acknowledge that a Marriot in Escondido would be an asset. What we object to is the subsidy of nearly 19 million dollars. The Marriot should be proud of it's operations. Escondido should be more cauties about how it subsidizes this project or others.

To tom and janice wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:01 AM:Is alot a word and if it is...would alittle and afew be a word also? Maybe you could ask richard?

Concerned wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:05 AM:To Straight Talk,

Good luck staffing your shift, recruiting and even finding a parking space.

Also, don't fret when SWAT/ENT are delayed because they must drive the speed limit and sit in traffic on their way to the station. Oh, and once they do arrive they must then find a place to park.

Seconds count during a hostage/barricade incident. A delayed response will cost the city more in defending a lawsuit than the entire take-home car program.

Brad wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:07 AM:It really amazes me that people, no matter who they are could actually want to pay all theses taxes to support people who are law breakers.

The banner at one of the stands at the street fair said something like this...humans are not illegal.

I agree! But the things some of them do certainly are and being here illegally is one of them. That's why they're called illegal aliens people!

They are breaking the law and we are having to pay for it! Why would we want them to stay and have more invited in?

I vote NO on anyone who either wants them to stay, wants to make it easier for more to come and wants me to have to pay more taxes to support them!!!

Hey JerryLen...... wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:35 AM:Just what mobilehome park(s) have all the people making over $151,000 living in them? There is no one making even $50,000 in the park I live in.

Council Kid wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:43 AM:HERE ARE THE FOUR ISSUES FOR THE NEXT YEAR IN THE CITY OF ESCONDIDO:

1)Center for the Arts Financial Failure.

2)Center for the Arts Financial Failure

3)Center for the Arts Financial Failure.

4)Center for the Arts Financial Failure.

There is more money at stake over the future of the Center for the Arts than cop cars, fire station staffing, or the Hotel.

What is the City Council (and the candidates for that Council) going to do about the MILLIONS BEING WASTED EACH YEAR TO SUBSIDIZE FAILED ARTS CENTER PROGRAMMING?

Why doesn't the Council (AND CANDIDATES) pledge to reduce funding to the Center and re-direct to PUBLIC SAFET?)

How can the taxpayers of Escondido NOT DEMAND IT!

Bob B wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:59 AM:First Sam wanted to mail out 50,000 parking permits to every address in the city. That went nowhere because it would do nothing but provide overcrowders with a permit to park in front of someone else's home. Now Sam, Olga, and Richard want to utilize a parking ordinance implemented by neighborhoods where outsiders come in and cause parking problems for residents, i.e. beach communities, streets near colleges, near employment centers, near train stations, etc. In Escondido some residents, not outsiders, are the problem. Sam, Olga, and Richard need to pay a little more attention to Ed Gallo to understand the problem and come up with a solution that will work.

treys little brother wrote on Nov 2, 2008 8:04 AM:Alan Greenspan said we are in a once in a hundred year recession. Its a global down turn that is effecting the entire world.

You silly people want to blame this on our current escondido city council???

Silly Libs tricks are for kids!!!

Jane wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:08 AM:Any Buddy but Olga
(Sam + Ed are my *Buddys*)

Tsk tsk what a waste wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:16 AM:note to Ed Gallo--we have received three duplicate campaign ads. from you in the mail. That's enough of a waste in itself, but what's even more puzzling is that you're wasting $ on blasting your flyers in "Unicorporated" neighborhoods of SD County where none of us are able to vote for you anyway. Any chance we could get you to stop? Hate to think of all the trees that are being killed because of your campaign.

To Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:27 AM:The Police flyer is true the quotes are on the flyer Just look Sept 19th 2008, Oct 19th 2006, Oct23th 2008 and Sept 19th 2008 Diaz is just Bad News

Mr. Barron wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:30 AM:Who is Richard Barron ? What is he running for ???

NCTimes on Notice wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:33 AM:Hey North County Times you're on notice! I have sent several blogs trying to get the truth about Olga Diaz out there. But the NCtimes won't post it. Funny they post all my other blogs. I know you endorsed Olga but please at least be a professional journal and allow freedom of speech. Oh yeah, Nctimes and professionalism is a contradiction in terms.

THE CANDIDATE THAT CARES wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:33 AM:IF YOU WANT A REAL REPUBLICAN IN THE CITY COUNCIL THEN FRENCH HAS TO BE YOUR CHOICE.
DENNIS FRENCH THE CANDIDATE THAT HAS NOT ACCEPTED MONEY FROM SPECIAL INTEREST AND WON'T HAVE TO PAY FAVORS BACK TO ANYBODY
FAMILY MAN,NAVY VETERAN, BUSINESS MAN, CHRISTIAN AND VOLUNTEER.

KB wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:35 AM:Tax dollars for a brand-name swank hotel is absurd, when the high school kids can't read nor write a cohesive paragraph.

To To Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:01 AM:Already tried. Actually, I dare you to try to locate a quote from Oct 23, 2008. Doesn't exist. Race baiting - nice job EPD.

Betty wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:31 AM:Anybody But Olga

Reply for Tsk Tsk wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:34 AM:It's called desperation.

To To To Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:34 AM:Please share with us what the quotes say on the flyer?

Mary wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:35 AM:"Anybody but olga"

J P downtown wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:39 AM:Our response to --Tsk Tsk-- This carelessness & waste mirrors that of his performance at City Hall. We support Sam Abed, though.

To To To Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:41 AM:I found the quote from Oct 23, 2008. Just look a little harder. " It was rampant racism. Just awful and it was ugly " Oct 23, 2008 (The Expreeso) and I found " I can't save the world, But I can serve Escondido " (The Expreeso)Ms Diaz anyone can serve. But you can not lead.

To To To To Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:58 AM:Its "The Espresso"...FYI

Say NO to take home patrol cars. Pay for your own gas like the rest of us.

Dave wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:02 PM:NO on Olga!
Vote for people who stand for this countries citizens.

Sam wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:05 PM:The minutemen endorsed Ed Gallo and Sam Abed for Escondido City Council - no rejections from those two.

Pink Power Ranger wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:33 PM:To:
Marriott International Inc.
[-] wrote on Nov 1, 2008 8:54 PM:


SOOOOOOOOOOOOO WHAT!

IF building an $86 MILLION Hotel in Escondido is such a good thing,then YOUR Company needs to finance the ENTIRE venture!NOT THE TAX PAYERS!

pssst! I hear Abed & Gallo will be looking for new positions...
can they wash dishes or empty trash for your hotel?

signed,
Pink ;p
proud gagalicious member
gagabedgallo
google it!
see NCTimes 11/02 for another helpful ad
section A page 12

HPST DAD wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:44 PM:Abed gets no support from me.
Gallo gets no support from me.
If they want a fancy hotel the hotel
chain needs to pay for it.
If a hotel in Escondido was such a good "investment" the hotel corporation would pay for it all....
the risk here has been the same it has been for years...
INCOMPETANT CITY COUNCIL & STAFF
people that cannot admit they are out of their element.

VOTE RICHARD BARRON

To KB wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:55 PM:I have to agree ... it is absurd, when the high school kids can't read nor write a cohesive paragraph, in English.

HPST DAD wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:11 PM:Oops! I forgot don't forget to VOTE for OLGA DIAZ!

Cotton Ballz wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:20 PM:My 2 Cents
[-] wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:54 AM:

@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @@
hey My 2 Cents
IF you think what we have on the Council now is any better you need tochange your screen name to
my - $ 9 MILLION DEFICIT 2007/08
and my projected -$15 MILLION DEFICIT 2008/09

YOU MAKE NO CENTS

VOTE DIAZ & BARRON
they make cents & sense.

Goodbye abed gallo
gagabedgallo
google it!
see NCTimes 11/02/08 section A page 12

Build it and the Nice People Will Come wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:23 PM:Even National City has a Marriott Hotel and they are every bit as much as a Third Word Dump as Escondido.

It is not about tourism, it is about business. Business Travelers think nothing of $150 a night. In fact that is cheap. There are no nice places anywhere else in Escondido area to spend a few nights. What is wrong with improving the city? Has anyone seen the artist’s concepts of the Hotel, and plaza and amenities? A nice restaurant and meeting rooms. It looks pretty nice.

Stop trying to keep Escondido in the Dark Ages. By the way the Marriott in National has been a steady source of jobs and revenue since it was built. Maybe Escondido can start generating some more business and convention traffic. Remember all of the people back east will make their reservations online, so they will not have any preconceived notions of Escondido, and that is probably a good thing.

Submarine Man wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:26 PM:I love Sam and Ed

A sucker is born wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:28 PM:every 15 minutes. ~ P.T.Barnum
Big developers come to Escondido and make suckers out of the incompetent City Council.
ONLY a SUCKER would agree to finance $18 million of this.
VOTE the clowns OUT!

Get the ticket that won't fall for sucker deals.
VOTE DIAZ & BARRON

Wretch wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:37 PM:that's what happened when I read the post at Nov 2 1:23 PM

We do not need to pay for this hotel.
The hotel chain needs to pay for it.
What Escondido NEEDS is
a new City Council!

"Build it" you are living in a dream or a hookah influenced cloud.

VOTE OUT ABED & GALLO

Prop 8 wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:39 PM:Submarine Man
[-] wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:26 PM:I love Sam and Ed


OKAY SO WE ALL KNOW WHERE THE TWO OF YOU STAND ON THIS ISSUE.

Syl wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:46 PM:Sam and Ed have our family's vote.

I think they represent the values and feelings of the majority of the Voting Public in Escondido.

Voter wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:47 PM:Sam Abed came to my house about a week ago to ask for my vote. He was a nice man. I asked him questions and he was very knowledgeable. I asked him about the other candidates and he said nice things about all of them, even Olga Diaz. In short, I was impressed with him and I will vote for him.

tax payer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:57 PM:Pfeiler 16 years on council
Waldron 12 years on council
Gallo 8 years on council
Abed 4 years on council
Daniels 2 years on council
How did Escondido get so dirty ,unsafe,& unprosperous?
Who mismanaged MILLIONS $$$ of tax dollars?
Who posted - $9.8 MILLION deficit 2007 ?
we still have graffiti,trash and poverty
everywhere.No matter what language you says it in....they failed Escondido!
*** UNSEAT ED & SAM ***
VOTE NOV 4 2008

GOODBYE ABED GALLO

to Voter wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:59 PM:sucker

TED wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:04 PM:Where is my promised high paying job?
Where is my promised high end neighborhood?
Where is my promised quality of life?
Sam & Ed you've done nothing to improve my life in Escondido the last 4 years.

I can improve my own quality of life Nov 4th by VOTING OUT SAM & ED.

Olga gets my vote!
She looks like she means business.I like that.

Curtis wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:12 PM:Vote for leaders with common sense; vote for Richard Barron & Olga Diaz

Orv wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:27 PM:During the past few years, we have experienced several frustrating incidents near our home in Escondido. In each instance, we have informed appropriate city departments with our concerns, and in most cases, our reports have received appropriate attention. On a few occasions, municipal action seemed slow, so we forwarded our concerns to the mayor and members of the City Council. Each time we did this, we received immediate attention from Councilman Ed Gallo.

On one particular occasion, the morning after our communication, Councilman Gallo was standing in front of our house observing the object of our complaint. This was quickly followed up with appropriate action by city staff. We believe Ed Gallo epitomizes what a council person should be to his or her constituents: responsive, caring, diligent and a person of action. He definitely has our vote in the upcoming election!

Class assignment wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:30 PM:All right, class. Today's assignment is simple. Read the letters and postings today, every one. Put them in three piles: obviously conservative, obviously liberal, and can't tell.

Throw the can't tell pile out. Now go through the other piles, one by one, and every time there is a statement claimed to be fact, investigate its truth on your own. Keep score. Then compare the number of lies in each group. Report back to us

Not Aunt Bea wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:33 PM:I myself support EPD and any other Police Officer out there.When I see Officers out in public I thank them for keeping me safe.They seem shocked.But it's what I do.I am sincere about it.

When I see politicians running for re election in a city that they have mismanaged & taken to the gutter,I am annoyed.I am annoyed when I see the Police Union endorsing those same politicians.I am annoyed when I learn that 119 of 155 Officers do not live here and cannot vote here.The Police Officers endorsement of these politicians is misleading to the general public. We are being lead to believe that ALL Escondido Police Officers approve these politicians.
You're supporting politicians that didn't support you.Then someone posted that an attorney for your union made the decision. Just too many excuses.When people change their stories.....you get the picture?
I don't believe I am ignorant.I would much rather you have the gasoline for work related mileage.A City with a deficit of - $9.8 million cannot afford to pay for anyone's commute.Your right you are the only thing between me and the criminal.But we have to find a way to make the City make the adjustments at City Hall (aka cut the fat)so we don't loose Police & Fire .We could stand to loose some of those people that never greet us when we enter city hall.They look at you as if you are bothering them for whatever it is you've come to ask for.Escondido just does not require over 1200 employees.
When I see that some of the highest paid positions at the City are held by people that don't even live here...that annoys me too.
Do I expect that my police & fire people live here?YES.
first responders?YES.
the Chief? YES.
City Manager?YES.
Council members?YES.

Call me naive but
I don't live in Mayberry.My name isn't Aunt Bea.
I know when I am being manipulated by politicians.And so should you & your union.In the future you all should elect a union rep that is fair and straight with you all.Not one that is being lead around by the politicians & attorneys.
I do not believe that the majority of Escondido residents think EPD is doing a bad job.On the contrary.I do believe EPD should take the credit for their work NOT Sam Abed or Ed Gallo.
Many have said right here EPD ROCKS.
I second that and I thank each and everyone of you for your service.

Because I want a better tomorrow for us all. I will cast my votes for Olga Diaz & Richard Barron.
Nothing like doing something that makes you feel good!

build it U said wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:48 PM:"It's not about tourism."


It's not about business either.
The hotel will have it's own eating places,room service and meeting rooms.
So they arent going to spend money outside the hotel.They won't have to use the Arts Center.

This is just a bad bad deal any way you look at it.The City should NOT be looking to buy their way into the hotel business in this market.Posting a deficit of -$9.8 million.They have no business spending another dime.

It's about the City's economy ...
NO on Gallo & Abed Nov 4th.

HPST MOM wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:52 PM:I love Richard Barron and feel the City will be in much better hands.

VOTE BARRON!

To Taxpayer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:52 PM:Submariner's wife?

Speaking of Taxpayers wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:57 PM:Escondido has the distinction of supporting a large group of people who simply do not pay taxes, due to low incomes, or legal residency status.

Why do you think so many people are fed up with the uncontrolled import of poverty into the United States? The same reason a lot of people are afraid of overly liberal socialist Democrats.

A good example is that Mexico is one of the lowest taxpaying countries in the world. When their people come here, the concept of paying personal income taxes is quite foreign to them, and many of them simply do not pay taxes. Of course many of them simply do not make enough money to pay taxes, but those people are a drain on the cities who must provide Emergency Services, Emergency medical care, and education and social services.

Don't blame the incumbents for this mess, and look around, all North County Cities are in a recession right now.

To Flyer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 3:10 PM:You are citing an article from September 2006. The on-line article doesn't have a date on it. You failed to verify the actual publication date. Again, September 2006. At that time, Abed and Gallo supported an ordinance in VIOLATION of the US Consitution. AT that time Diaz knew it was wrong and costly - she was correct. They spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on their pet project. Enough money to buy you gas for two years. 2006 vs. 2008 - get your head around it.

Litmus Test wrote on Nov 2, 2008 3:50 PM:Olga Diaz is against drivers license checkpoints and Abed and Gallo support them. That is all you need to know.

Simply Redistribute the Wealth wrote on Nov 2, 2008 3:55 PM:Come On All You Taxpayers, Let's Sing!

It's a world of laughter A world of tears, It's a world of hopes And a world of fears, There's so much that we share, That it's time we're aware It's a small world after all. There is just one moon And one golden sun, And a smile means Friendship to ev'ryone, Though the mountains divide And the oceans are wide, It's a small world after all. It's a small world after all, It's a small world after all, It's a small world after all, It's a small, small world. "

Amused wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:04 PM:I'm amused by all the comments written by the obvious supporters of the incumbents and I suspect the incumbents themselves.

It's amusing how their comments are focused on how nice and knowledgeable and caring the incumbents are and then by "coincidence" there just happens to be something farfetched, straight up lies or downright rudeness about the biggest threats to the incumbents chances of re-election, Diaz & Barron.

What is true is that Escondido's current financial situation is much worse off than any of the incumbents even knew. What was a $1.6 million deficit is now a $5 million deficit. This of course is on top of the 7.5% decrease in funding that the council demanded from nearly every city dept. Initially the city projected an overall $9.8 million dollar revenue shortfall. Add another $3.4 million and you have an overall $13.2 million revenue shortfall. The current economic situation of the nation is not the main culprit of Escondido's predicament - the main culprit is BAD FISCAL MANAGEMENT BY OUR COUNCIL.

The supporters do not want to talk about our financial mess - they want to talk about "trigger" issues. Too bad these trigger-happy supporters haven't snapped into today's world and realized that the ECONOMY is the SINGLE BIGGEST ISSUE OUR CITY & OUR NATION IS FACING!!!

Abed and Gallo are up for re-election and therefore their involvement in the workings of the local government (the City Council) and their records are up for review.

Our median income has decreased. Yet, Abed says the city is more prosperous.

Downtown Escondido is now filled with partially completed condo projects and many, many empty storefronts.

Our streets are worn and tired. Our sewer system is about the explode burying us all in the muck.

Our services have been cut and our fees increased.

The council gets pay raises, $9,000/yr gas allowances and the hotel developer gets $18.9 million.

The Firefighters get minimal staff and Gallo's supporters makes anti-firefighters union signs
(One cannot be AGAINST the firefighters union and FOR the firefighters - who do they think the individual firefighters would choose? The council or the FF's union reps (one of their own). I'm pretty sure I know.

And...the council wants to adopt a parking ordinance that will directly affect more than half of Escondido's population. Even though a $49,000 taxpayer funded study revealed that only 3% of the streets surveyed were impacted.

I'm not voting for Abed and Gallo - based on their records and their involvement. Our city has suffered so much in just the last four years. We've got a couple thousand more homes and nothing new for the people's quality of life.

I'm voting for candidates with a strong background in finances and a record of success in finances.

Barron: Engineer, Nuclear Physicist, Successful Business Owner of an International Consulting Firm - attended Harvard Business School and graduated London University. Former CEO of $100 million publicly traded company.

Diaz: Successful business woman, mother, wife of an police officer, graduate of Santa Clara University, Bachelor of Science in Accounting and Commerce. Experienced in audit, research and data work.

Vote for intelligent Fiscal Management - Vote for the candidates with a record of Financial Success!

Vote for Diaz and Barron!!

TO Ted wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:18 PM:Don't worry Ted !

This fits in nicely with the Democrats basic philosophy.

WE WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU.

Don't matter if you went to school.
Don't matter if you are motovated.
Don't matter if you are qualified.
Don't matter if you try.
Don't matter if you are not a legal resident.

WE WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU.

The democrats are coming!

I was wrong wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:44 PM:at least I can admit it. Last month I was anti-firefighters union for that stupid political flyer. It made me pay attention, just to prove you wrong. Now it seems there may be some truth to what you said. You made your point and I will investigate prior to taking anyone's word.

Why wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:48 PM:Why hasn't Abed addressed the anti-firefighter union signs like he did the anti-Gallo signs?

What The sicialists Democrats Have Done wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:49 PM:Don’t worry. Look at Europe. There’s no crime in Europe. You’ll be safe. There’s no poverty in Europe. You’ll be secure. Medicine? I promise, you will get the absolute…best…medical care…available. If it’s available, I promise, you’ll get it.

Vote Obama. Feel warm. Doesn’t it feel nice?