MURRIETA: Approval of Clinton Keith day-care center to be appealed
Hearing will allow residents who live near the project the opportunity to speak
By NELSY RODRIGUEZ - Staff Writer | ∞
MURRIETA ---- A planned daycare center that underwent significant changes to accommodate concerns of residents who live nearby will be challenged again at the behest of at least one neighbor.
The Murrieta City Council on Tuesday will hear an appeal to the Planning Commission's approval of a plan to build a day-care center and office buildings on 2.3 acres at the northwest corner of Clinton Keith Road and Nutmeg Street. The hearing will be held during the council's 7 p.m. meeting at City Hall, 24601 Jefferson Ave.
Mayor Rick Gibbs and resident John McClendon filed appeals of the project, which was approved by the Planning Commission in June with a 3-1-1 vote.
Commissioner Barbara Lupro cast the no vote, while commissioner Tom Butler abstained from the proceedings because he lives near the project site.
Gibbs stated in a July request for the appeal that he has "no objection to the specifics of the project, but a number or residents that have been involved in the area for 10 years were not able to attend (the June meeting). Through this appeal, they will have the opportunity to attend a public meeting on the project."
McClendon does have objections.
He has been a vocal opponent of the project since its first proposal, in 2006. He has said he believes the area should only be used for office space.
His July appeal, for which he was charged $1,030 by the city, challenges on the basis that an environmental impact review was not completed, and that the public was not given "adequate time" to review project revisions.
"Previously... (city staff) did a good job of keeping us all apprised of new submissions by the owners and upcoming hearings on the proposals," McClendon's appeal states. "However, I am stunned that, this time, no one on city staff had the courtesy to inform the residents or me that the owners had resurrected a new project for their property."
McClendon is also challenging the $1,030 fee he was charged to file the appeal. McClendon's letter states the fee is excessive and unnecessary because Gibbs had already requested the appeal.
McClendon could not be reached for comment Friday.
City officials are recommending that the City Council deny the appeal on the basis that the project does not require an environmental report, city reports state.
The June approval of the project follows a lengthy process of redesigning aimed to address numerous concerns voiced by city officials and residents.
What types of projects would be appropriate on that land has been debated for 10 years.
In 1998, the council denied a proposed shopping center on the site, which was zoned single-family residential. The developer of that plan successfully sued the city, prompting a judge to order the council to reach an accommodation with the property owner, according to a city document.
The agreement permitted a commercial center, as long as it was primarily an office complex serving the neighborhood. But the deal allowed certain retail uses with a special permit.
In 2006, Yoon and Millie Lee, the day-care developers, proposed constructing three buildings with office space and the day care. The commission in May 2007 denied the project, saying the design still posed dangerous traffic conditions for Clinton Keith Road travelers and the architecture was "incompatible" with surrounding homes.
The Lees appealed the denial to the City Council in July 2007, and received permission to redesign the project and again present it to the commission. This summer, the commission approved those plans.
During the June meeting in which the project was approved, commissioners and a handful of residents who spoke mostly in favor of the project commended the Lees for redesigning to satisfy the concerns of residents. But some residents still disapproved because the plans includes a two-story office building.
Contact staff writer Nelsy Rodriguez at (951) 676-4315, ext. 2626, or nrodriguez@californian.com.
More Stories
Advertisement
Let us think wrote on Nov 29, 2008 6:31 PM:Are we going to deny this project, and create an artificial shortage of day care facilities in Murrieta? As I see it, this does nothing but up the chances for the "vanHaaster" day care center to win the public relations battle. This project should proceed. It is the direct opposite of the vanHaaster-related dispute, with in this case an "abstaining" city official affected enough by close proximity to indeed have to abstain. The permitting of this project would send a message that no project will be voted either up or down to benefit a public official.
Clinton Keith Traveler wrote on Nov 30, 2008 6:59 AM:With the speeds traveled on Clinton Keith, might as well put the daycare on the 215. Makes perfect sense to me to have a thousand moms staged on Clinton Keith waiting to turn into the facility.
RMM wrote on Nov 30, 2008 8:15 AM:Those opposing the project should have to buy the parcel of land and do with it what they see fit. Lesson one in real estate - do not buy a home next to a vacant lot - you never know what might go there. I get tired of all these crybabies who didn't have the foresight to buy somewhere already developed. They incur a LOT of nuisance and expense to the rightful owners. I'd wager that no matter what is proposed for that lot, someone will protest it. And, judges and city councils that kowtow to them make the situation worse. Ante up, or move.
Great wrote on Nov 30, 2008 10:09 AM:Just what we need another facility day care.Let us small business day care's have a chance. A home day care is safer and you have smaller groups.
to RMM wrote on Nov 30, 2008 10:58 AM:I agree with you 100 percent, and so do a lot of people I know in Murrieta. When private property rights, including reasonable rights of development or disposition of existing improvements, start being curbed or politically restricted; the community as a whole begins to be crippled in ways that are unseen for a period of time. The overall community of property values becomes fundamentally undermined. In a strange way, it is similar to the hidden dangers that evolved unseen during the subprime loan-repackaging buildup. The worst evolving problems rarely are seen on the surface until the damage has become severe. Let's not wreck Murrieta's economy just when we should be doing everything possible to support it.
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (10463)
- TEMECULA: Protesters line intersection (6482)
- ESCONDIDO: 3 DUI arrests, 46 impounds at checkpoint (5254)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (5003)
- ESCONDIDO: City's dreams of an 'upscale' downtown may be dying (4895)
- HOUSING: Local median price up for third straight month (45)
- ESCONDIDO: Man shot dead at Fourth of July party (44)
- FALLBROOK: Peruvian chocolatier living sweet American dream (29)
- ESCONDIDO: Border Patrol employee in custody after hatchet attack (28)
- ESCONDIDO: Victim's roommate recalls July 4 shooting, friends gather for vigil (27)
Advertisement





