About Our Ads | Privacy

HomeNewsOpinionForum

Skate parks constrained by unnecessary regulation

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

ID check, supervision, consent, annual fee, per use fee, helmet, elbow pads, kneepads. A problem exists when facilities designed to promote action sports are more of a burden than a blessing. This burden is the Southern California skate park standard.

YMCA skate parks in San Diego and North County require at least a $20 annual registration plus a fee in the $5 range for each session. Escondido requires the same. Even public parks from Borrego to Coronado require $10 entrance fees or $50-$100 memberships. The protective pads alone (required) will total more than $100.

In my experience, if the damper isn't fees it is inconvenience. Those under 18 require parentally signed paperwork; I could not even sign for my own nephew. For those over 18, at least you can sign your life away without Mom and Dad. And yes, your $100 worth of pads are still required or else the park worker may scold you and make you leave.

I have seen free tennis courts remain empty, unsupervised basketball hoops sit forgotten, and only an occasional swing enthusiast at the playground (helmetless by the way). Recreational interests seem to have shifted for many, yet the facilities used most are hardest to gain access to because, in California, even the most dilapidated skate parks are pay-to-play and sign on your way. Why is this?

Liability and costs.

Liability concerns are the biggest hurdle in skate-park construction and management. This is due to the misconception that injuries are more common in extreme sports. Statistics from the National Safety Council in 1999 show football and soccer injuries are 18.8 injuries per 1,000 participants and 13.3 injuries per 1,000 participants respectively. Skateboarding? 8.6 injuries per 1,000 participants. With this information it would make sense to ask the same of other traditional sports pickup games using public fields. Pad laws in skate parks are made even more unnecessary by the state's "Hazardous Recreational Activities" list, which releases liability in activities such as skateboarding.

After being built, maintenance on constructed parks is minimal, but fees continue to support the park workers that collect fees, sweep up and enforce rules. All of which is expendable with efficient skate-park managing and the care that naturally follows users keeping their spot ridable.

"Use at own risk" signs are adequate protection for the majority of states across the country. They are seeing the bigger force that action sports have become and are accommodating.

Southern California, on the other hand, is dragging behind, still charging an arm and a leg (which you will have to pad at your expense). Decreasing skate-park regulation would mean less skaters getting pushed out into the streets, where they face fines, disgruntled neighbors and traffic. Instead, the California approach is the outlawing of skateboarding in cities and embracing shortcomings of its designated facilities. If California aims to satisfy its citizens and relieve itself of the "nuisance" they see extreme sports as, it is taking steps in an opposite direction.

- La Mesa resident Kory Prindle, a longtime skateboarder, is a recreation and systems management major at San Diego State University and a former San Diego skate-park attendant.

Discuss Print Email

/news/opinion/commentary